DONALD TRUMP ACCUSED OF CAUSING “GLOBAL WARMING”

 

 

 

 

Recently, at a few of Donald Trump speaking loci, small disturbances have occurred. In my memory they have ranged from “questioning hog” journalists, television talking head “muggers,” Black Lives Matter mini-mobs, and various taunters. His supporters have on occasion gone to his support, usually vocally, but recently on at least one occasion throwing a punch at a heckler.

In an age in America where assassins seem to leap from crowds to shoot leading politicians and other public figures, one cannot fault political supporters who are willing to put their lives on the line to offer a defense for the leader of their choice.

Donald Trump and his supporters have been accused of trying to thwart “freedom of speech” by media, other politicians and mob leaders. This charge ranks among the most disingenuous misrepresentation of First Amendment guarantees currently being approvingly bruited and bandied about by media-ordained “responsible voices.” The obstreperous mini-mobs and individuals attending the Trump events were doing so to interfere with Trump’s right to express himself and to embarrass him. En passant they hoped misguidedly to promote their group’s (or individual’s) agenda. In some instances, the raucous individuals may have been the “fruit” of a flash mob call for political vandalism.

It seems likely that Trump will experience flash mob disturbances in the future – the existence of numerous police and Secret Service agents present at such events notwithstanding. The major media invites such events for the sake of spicing and spiking ratings from curiosity seekers (and television audience equivalents of ambulance chasers). There may even be shadowy power brokers who might utilize such chaotic disturbances to actually attempt to assassinate Donald Trump.

A climate of foreboding and danger in regard to a successful Trump campaign has been created by opposition Republican forces. Numerous well-known politicians, some running for the Republican presidential nomination, have sounded the shrillest (and silliest) alarms about a successful Donald Trump campaign one could imagine. Certainly, Marco Rubio “takes the cake” for earnest imbecility in this regard. Mitt Romney, a clumsy brute, has lately entered the political contest to lend his “prestige” to the “Stop Trump” movement. [Is there something fatal politically about the initials MR?]

Most everyone knows that rich, occult “American” families have been behind the orchestration of the denial of the Republican nomination to Mr. Donald Trump. He may actually be just another occult, prominent American but has been deemed ineligible for the presidency because he hasn’t reached sufficiently elevated degrees to qualify.

All the opposition toward Donald Trump by prominent politicians, rich people, major media spokespeople, entertainment stars, etc,. aired on television & radio and disseminated by press outlets, tends to promote and validate the remarkably gauche behavior toward him by strident sorts in inappropriate forums. This is not likely to be accidental; it seems to be programmed.

The fault is not Trumps. The fault is founded in a Resident Evil, which will not be limited by rules of order, ethics or Biblically-based morality in its effort to “evolve America.” If they are against Donald Trump, who can stand against them?
 

It seems inevitable that Donald Trump will be accused by the academic-intellectual-creative complex, which is “owned” by the Resident Evil, of causing global warming. When these people demonize a person, they don’t feel any constraint about broadening the scope of “sins” to which the attacked person has been found guilty.

Donald can’t fire these people. They are like tropical mosquitoes; they continually evolve a new pox to inflict on people. American leaders will suffer no barrier to their expansion, but do Trump followers have to quietly accept their dreadful drone?

Texas Judge: Scalia Died of Natural Causes

Texas Law Official Talked to Medical Doctor and U.S. Marshall and Was Told There Were No Signs Indicating Other Than "Natural Cause" for Justice Scalia's Death. She Did Not Insist Upon Personally Viewing Antonin Scalia. This Seems Irresponsible Avoidance of the Execution of a Law Officer's Duty. If S/he Wears the Badge and Has the Jurisdiction Thereof, Why Would She Not Demand To View the Deceased? Were Photographs Taken? When Top Officials of Government Suddenly Die, Legal Authorities of the Jurisdiction Should Always Carefully -and in Detail - Examine the Physical Remains of the Deceased. The Family Should Have No Say in the Matter. No One Who Accepts High Appointive Office Should Do So Unless Fully Accepting the Principle of a Full Autopsy upon Sudden, unexpected Death of That Person. Certainly, Since 1960, The U.S.A. Has Existed in an Era of Assassinations, Often With Suspicions of Complicity by Elements Within the Government. This Is the Way America Is Now. Grow Up!

FNP: PREZ EYEZ NEW CALIPHATE

 



Faux News Press (FNP)_Washington, DC:

 

NEWS BRIEF 

FNP has learned from sources at the highest levels of the White House that President Obama and Prince Bandar, representing Saudi Arabia and key Arab states allied with his oil-rich state, were meeting to discuss the creation of a new, vast political structure.

According to FNP’s usually reliable sources, interviewed separately and without knowledge of the others’ participation, a hitherto undiscovered document residing in an obscure section of the Library of Congress and authored by the late leader of Egypt, Gamel Abdul Nasser, contained the design for a vast new caliphate and the rationale for it.

A key White House source, who demanded anonymity as a condition for leaking information, stated that Mr. Nasser had learned from a scientific adviser to David Ben-Gurien that most Jews shared a gene in common with the average African, which made them prone to violence and crimes associated with avarice. As with the Jews, Mr. Nasser had been informed, so with most Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula. The latter also possessed this unique African gene.

While cautioning Mr. Ben-Gurien that he was not an expert in history, the Jewish scholar noted that Arabs had attacked all infidel areas, such as Europe, on numerous occasions. He also pointed out the marked violence of Africans toward white and Indian settlers, traders and missionaries. Further, even diluted Africans in the Americas were prone to great violence against whites, Indians, and others.

Those tendencies could also be detected among Jews, the scientist noted. Repeatedly, Jews had been punished in Europe during the Middle Ages for economic crimes. They created violent gangs to employ against non-Jews - even lords of the various realms. They participated as middle-men in engineering wars between European states and other European states, as well as Arab and Asian states. They were principal agents of slavery for profit. They were the modern inventers of terror as a weapon to destroy regimes and especially national monarchies. They created the modern concentration camps in Russia, where 55-60 million inmates prematurely perished for lack of provisions necessary to live.

According to sources familiar with the Nasser Document, Gamel Abdul Nasser had been persuaded by David Ben-Gurien that the Prophet Mohammed was an Edomite Jew who hoped to create for his father, Esau, a holy book which could compete with the holy book of the Israelites. Then Ben-Gurien made a crucial revelation to Nasser. According to the Nasser Document, most Jews have Edomite blood but virtually no Israelite blood. By this means David Ben-Gurien had convinced the Egyptian leader that their two people, as well as most Arabs, were part a great African people. They should form a pan-African peoples’ caliphate. Once formed, they could wage war against the other peoples, forcing them into slavery.

At that time the plan had been thwarted by Franco-British intelligence, who engineered the assassination of Nasser and the Suez Canal debacle, which temporarily derailed Ben-Gurien’s grand design.

FNP has learned from Gurli Gur, the Israeli media superstar, that after the disruptions, David Ben-Gurien set his sights on gaining nuclear weapons so that no one would ever thwart or threaten Israeli policies again. His pursuit was so marked that Ben-Gurien came into conflict with John F. Kennedy, who strongly opposed the mini-states’ possessing nuclear weapons.

Some scholarly journalists have suggested that David Ben-Gurien was actually responsible for the Kennedy assassination, either directly or by remaining mute rather than sharing data on the threat with appropriate U.S. authorities. Ben-Gurien’s defenders claim that if high U.S. authorities were themselves involved in the assassination, then remaining quiet was his best option.

According to FNP, Prince Bandar had heard reports from learned Arabs protecting documents created during the reigns of the kings of Saudi Arabia that Gamel Abdul Nasser had a dream that one day his people would unite in a caliphate republic.

On a state visit to Saudi Arabia, President Barack Obama had an occasion to meet privately with Prince Bandar, and the subject of Nasser’s Dream arose. The American president was asked if he had heard of such a thing or knew of documents relating to the Egyptian’s idea.

According to high White House sources, President Obama was excited to hear of such a plan. He called it “great” and assured Prince Bandar that if such a document existed in American archives, he would have it uncovered and brought to him.

FNP has learned from an unimpeachable source high up in Justice that Attorney General Eric Holder, who was known to the president to be tiring of his role at the Department of Justice, met with President Obama and was ordered to resign from Justice and to devote all his time to uncovering any data relating to the Nasser Dream. Mr. Holder was assured of complete White House support and free access to all stored documents housed anywhere in the federal government.
 





 

FNP has inferred from numerous sources and from the players involved that Barack Obama believed that the United States was now ready to join such a magnificent union of African-Arab-Edom peoples. He had discussed his idea with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and they had analyzed the plan as constitutional. Mayor Rahm Emanuel had reached the same conclusion.

Therefore, President Obama was delighted when Prince Bandar accepted his invitation to visit the White House on a state visit, sanctioned by the king of Saudi Arabia. It has been alleged that it was at this visit that President Obama signed a secret understanding with Prince Bandar to meet with all the relevant leaders in 2016 to sign Documents of Union among the gathered states to proceed as soon as possible to form the American-African-Arabic-Edomite caliphate republic, which shall be known as the “AAAE Caliphate Republic.” The signers envision other nations, such as Brazil, Columbia, et cetera, joining the caliphate over time – either willingly or jihad.

As President Obama was quoted to have stated to Prince Bandar, while in Saudi Arabia: “’Let the wars begin!’ shall be the legend on our flag.”

FNP will pursue the facts further on this astonishing event. 

FRANCE: EVIL-DOINGS

 

Today, I learned about a major terror-event in France. First, I heard it on radio stations affiliated with or oriented toward major media newspeak. Then, returning home, I turned on the news at CNN, followed by the news on Fox News. All of these presented the event as a “who did this; what do they want?” act(s) of terrorism. They pretended not to have a clue. “Do you think the terrorists were linked to ISIS?” questions confusedly offered. Naturally, they all featured well-known radio or television fronts for the CIA or FBI to provide expert opinions and analyses. 

Besides ISIS and “Jihadists,” all the newshounds could find no scent. Still, there were issues raised about the refugees flooding into Europe “to escape the bombings and seeking a better life.” Some experts, prodded by a newshound, hypothesized that “jihadists” may have sneaked into Europe with the desperate young males that dominated the demographics of the refugees. Most of these refugees were like other people everywhere: they just wanted a decent life, plenty of pretty ‘hos, and, once they had put down roots, to seek a good woman from back home to join him, wed him, give him a proper home and give him proper children. 

Western Europe is largely shaped by occult circles, including Zionism. These circles often resulted from formations of secret or semi-secret societies in prior years. They may go back thousands of years as products of occult evolution. Members of such circles may be Luciferians, Satanists, Devil-worshippers, atheists, deists, Magi, wiccans and the like. From an intellectual point of view, they all belong in the cabala religions, or “mystery religions.” 

Luciferians often proclaim that Lucifer is the “god of light” and, thus, he is the friend of mankind, as opposed to Adanai, the evil god of darkness (aka, Yhway of the bible). 

A cabala atheist may claim that “god does not exist.” That may shock pious Christians, but he typically means that “god is beyond existence.” 

However, their beliefs may be rationalized, they tend to be part of a category. Typically, they all oppose the Israelitish Christian beliefs, based on the bible. In some cases, contempt is evident (Ted Turner, Luciferian). In others, hatred is not hidden (Manley Hall, exalted Freemason). 

The richest families in the Western nations belong to these circles. They also set national and international policies through their egghead advisers and pliant politicians. The military departments of each Western nation act as “enforcers” in extra-Western nations with whom these families deal. Locally, the police in a nation act as the “enforcers” of their will which politicians enact into law. Their intelligence agencies also “enforce” their policies, often taking the “serpent road” (clandestine & deadly). 

These ruling circles have penetrated Western Christianity to the extent that they have made them overwhelmingly “of none effect.” Many of Christian clergy are Freemasons, Satanists, “converted” Jews, atheists, neo-uranians, and plain heretics. The major media, owned by members of the Resident Evil, rejoice in reporting about scandalous members of the clergy. Human sacrifice may even be committed by some for occult benefits. 

These people hate Yhshua (Jesus) and Christians, missing no opportunity to ridicule and injure. They rejoice to be able to use nominal Christians to attack and defame Christianity. 

As an unequal counterpoint, note how virtually no one will dare to criticize any Jew or any Jewish act, for fear of angering the Jews (“Don’t make the Jews angry!”) 

Let us now return to France. 

In the latter part of the 19^th Century, it was alleged that out of Masonic lodges came a plan developed by Luciferians to engineer a 3^rd world war in which Christians and Muslims would fight to the state of mutual annihilation and/or exhaustion, whereupon the Luciferians could finish them off. They then would establish a world government based on the “light” of Luciferian principles. Ignorance would be banished from the world, and each human would then evolve to perfection. It is a variation of the Jews’ Tikkun olam (“repair of the world”). 

Given the wealth and power of the great families of the West and given the skills, crafts and materials of-and-for mischief possessed by their militaries and intelligence organizations, why would it not be part of the “final solution” of such people to force the two combatants into a common ring, whether Europe or North America – indeed, the Levant – to create the conditions necessary for a “fight to the death?” 

After WW2, the Allied powers met in the United Nations ostensibly to create and enact, often by treaties, laws which would nominally bind its members. Although few Americans think very much ahead, among the Resident Evil there are many who think far ahead. As with grand master chess-players, before making a move, they explore all possible options exhaustively to avoid a “blunder.” One such farsighted law involved the problem of refugees. As the Allies were well aware, wars create refugees. They created a law that mandated that member nations accept a certain level of refugees, when unfortunate conditions create them.  

The Western nations, being wealthier and with a sudden dearth of workers, were friendly toward receiving refugees. Naturally, well-run nations refused, always making an excuse. Not to worry, as Freemasons wanted to make a universal “new man” (which I dubbed Homo blendo), Western nations gladly accepted them. 

Therefore, the Resident Evil had long ago gotten into place the means to bring the hated Muslims and hated Christians “cheek to jowl.” 

Therefore, two crucial events occurred. Firstly, the Resident Evil was able to transform god-fearing Western people, especially Americans, into an immoral, bogus-Christian people, who were primarily interested in “drugs, and sex and rock-n-roll.”  

Secondly, a fundamentalist Islamic revival occurred or was engineered. 

Then, with the aid of Western money, Western war materiel, Western intelligence, undercover agents, cut-outs, false-flag street theatre and sabotage (terrorism), Islamic rebellions, revolutions and jihads sprouted everywhere. Soon after, the West, especially America, helped by Israelis, were freely bombing wedding parties, children, hospitals, schools, etc., as we and our allies struck “hard” at the enemy. Of course, refugees began to appear. [Without going into this area now, something of the same occurred in Africa.] 

At first the refugees in the Middle East lived in camps in Arab countries not too distant from their own country. The solution arrived at by the Resident Evil was simply to turn the whole area of the Levant into three camps: war, Israel, and refugee-refusing Arab nations. Hence forth, there existed only the posh digs of Europe and America offering hope, and here they came. 

However, for fundamentalist Muslims, who hated Western corruption, the refugees became the river through which they would swim to the great cities of the West. Carving out their own neighborhoods, they could take time to study the new world in which they dwelled, becoming well-familiar with their enemies’ ways and weaknesses. 

Although American newshounds were baffled by the latest terrorism in France (“were they not getting enough cake?”), the attack on the heavy-metal American band, which played at a small arena in Paris, utterly confounded the newshounds on CNN and Fox.  

Heavy-Metal rock-n-roll groups have been notorious from their outset for ear-splitting sound, base lines, and Satanic/sexual lyrics. What better place for a fundamentalist Islamic jihadist group to strike than a Satanic band, based in the Great Satan (America), and now playing in corrupt Paris to a SRO crowd of effete French youth? It was a fact that one of the Islamic terrorists shouted, “Allah Akbar!” prior to his aiming and firing his AK-47, along with his jihadist companions, and, in effect, using bullets, flung from the steely arms of their rifles, to “stone to death” the Satanists gathered in that temporary coven.  

None of this provided any clue whatsoever to the major media newshounds, nor to their expert advisers, about the nature of the event that unfolded. They will be trying to figure this one out for days, even weeks. Ominously, President Obama offered the French any assistance, including that of the FBI. 

Caveat: Expect American members of the Resident Evil to use this gruesome set of terror events to demand that the U.S. courts immediately interpret the 2^nd Amendment in such a way that “sanity” can be brought to bear on the issue of gun violence in America.

 

 

 

A QUESTION OF SHAME?

 

On October 22, 2015 CNN provided glimpses of the lengthy session before a congressional committee investigating the role of Hillary Clinton in the “terrorist” attack on the United States embassy in Benghazi, resulting in the deaths of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others. This program was hosted by Anderson Cooper. He inquired of various guests what their opinions were in regard to her response to questions and in regard to the committee members’ questions and the overall atmosphere at the meeting.

Most of the opinions expressed admiration for Mrs. Clinton’s handling of numerous, often hostile questions, and they appeared to be generally at one that the session lasted too long and verged on brutal at times.

Among the five observers were David Gergen and Carl Bernstein. Mr. Gergen has appeared on major media programs on many occasions over the years. He has invariably been described as “an adviser to six presidents,” even though he was not holding an appointed position in the vast majority of prior administrations. Was he that effective – or was he courier?

When Carl Bernstein was asked for his view, the pudgy, wealthy author and former reporter for The Washington Post during its apex under Katherine Meyer Graham, saw fit to compare the committee focusing on Benghazi as [Joseph] McCarthy-like in its approach to Hillary Clinton.

This observation was seconded by other members of the panel.

What was curious about the Bernstein comparison of the Senate Un-American Activities Committee, chaired by Senator Joseph McCarthy, with the House Benghazi Committee, chaired by Congressman Trey Gowdy, was that the fall of the U.S.S.R. allowed Western scholars to investigate many of the previously unavailable documents, which provided overwhelming confirmation that many of the government officials scrutinized by Sen. McCarthy’s committee were in fact Soviet agents. They had infiltrated various government agencies, especially DOD and State. Even the Supreme Court witnessed the infiltration of a Marxist traitor in the person of Justice Felix Frankfurter. Mr. Frankfurter was a mentor of Philip Graham, publisher of The Washington Post and husband of Katherine Meyer Graham, who was the daughter of Eugene Meyer, who bought the newspaper in or about 1930.

The others on Anderson Cooper’s panel, such as David Gergen, seemed to share this Bernstein insight.

Besides the inconvenient fact that Senator Joseph McCarthy was largely correct – and might be excused for his hostility to traitors by all but communist fellow travelers, Bernstein’s comparison suggested a sub rosa element. He may have been implying or signaling that the Benghazi Committee was threatening to become a “Jewish witch-hunt” or a threat to Israel’s security.

Since Jews had become well aware that the vast majority of anti-communist movements were thinly disguised anti-Semitic attacks, they apparently organized a counter-attack on the concept of an “Un-American” activity generally and Senator Joseph McCarthy particularly. I don’t believe there exists evidence proving that Senator McCarthy was anti-Semitic. He has been described as kind-hearted by nature. However, to be anti-communist was the same as being anti-Semitic in the eyes of many - and especially in the eyes of leftist Jews.

I now look for a general counter-attack against “unsophisticated, narrow-minded, xenophobic” Republican partisans. I expect that the Benghazi Committee hearing(s) will be framed as a “witch-hunt” and as “infamous.” I expect that “experts” will begin to suggest that these kinds of hearings will hurt the security of Israel.

Since the strength of the “Tea Party” Republicans is founded upon millions of “Zionist” Christians blindly, ardently expressing undying love for Israel and the Jews – often with the same ardent enthusiasm that the ancestors of many of them expressed for “Southern rights,” the suggestion that the Benghazi Committee would not hurt Hillary – it would hurt Israel – would annihilate any further attacks on Hillary on this issue by Republicans.

BAD INFLUENCE

 

For more than a year there have been repeated instances of conflicts between police and citizens in the United States of America. The most widely reported instances have involved police and African American citizens. The conflicts between police and many of these African American citizens have involved lethal force by police against citizens, often resulting in organized protests by relatives, friends and concerned citizens. The major media has often given national coverage to these events. Naturally, local media have joined in the coverage where appropriate.

Although the conflicts have seemed particularly vivid as shown on television, as they often involved rioting, the police-citizen conflicts have been occurring regularly over the years. These conflicts between police and African Americans have especially planted seeds of resentment in predominantly African American neighborhoods, which periodically bear fruit in the form of rioting.

Furthermore, the conflicts that arise often seem to be over relatively trivial matters. Police have been shown repeatedly trying to enforce issues at law that have little weight in and of themselves. Bored legislators are always up to amuse themselves with a silly law that no one seriously expects a police officer to enforce. Yet, the experience historically is that there are police who will try to enforce them – again, perhaps out of boredom. When police stop a citizen to try to enforce a silly law, anger may be fueled, as the matter becomes an issue of wills more than at law.

Everyone wants police to enforce fundamentally weighty issues at law, such as would result from armed robbery, aggravated assaults, domestic violence, burglary, et al, where direct or indirect injury to the citizen is involved. Yet, one can visit YouTube on the Internet and regularly see video where police use excessive force, including kicking at citizens already on the ground. What could possibly be causing American police to “go off” on a citizen?

The matter engendered in me today an association that may well be a factor.

For many years, now, I have rather regularly seen on television, or read about in a lesser news outlet, or viewed on the Internet scenes of violent conflict between Palestinians and Israelis. The Israelis have such a disproportionate military might relative to the Palestinians that all conflicts have been settled according to terms dictated by Israeli military might. The victors hold the losers in derision. The humiliated losers exist with simmering anger and in an impoverished state, which condition, when cruelly provoked again and again, engenders periodic, riotous outbursts.

For many years now, I have been aware that the Israeli state invited American fedcops, such as FBI agents, Homeland Security agents, etc., to be the guests of the IDF, Mossad, etc., who would share Israeli techniques for handling terrorists, rioting Palestinians, and the like. Undoubtedly, the Israelis have developed new tools for quelling angry mobs and extracting answers from prisoners, which American law enforcement agencies might want to consider for use in their own jurisdiction.

Along with invitations to federal law-enforcement agencies, the Israelis have also invited police officers, usually in leadership positions, and county sheriffs from various states of the United States. Therefore, over the years, a significant number of American law-enforcement people have been indoctrinated by the Israeli military, police and intelligence forces in the way the Israelis do business in the arena of “keeping the peace.”

Needless to say, the Israelis would not be doing this without motivation to an end. Schmoozing American lawmen is simply something no one from another country would normally, regularly do – unless they had a good reason.

I might here add a personal supposition that has no known factual basis. The American lawmen go to Israel to ostensibly learn about the Israeli approach to enforcing the laws of Israel, hoping to glean something that could usefully be applied in their work in America. They are also treated to some sightseeing and entertainment by their hosts. I believe that the Israelis probably intentionally provide the opportunity for drunkenness. I believe that it is likely that certain American lawmen have been targeted, based on previously obtained dossiers which have been psychologically analyzed for useful weaknesses.

How might such “targeting” by used by Israelis?

If a selected American lawman were taken on a tour of, say, Tel-a-Viv, by his new Israeli pals, he just might be taken to a “tootsie house” for fun-n-games. Needless to say, the whole house would be filled with clandestine cameras. The Israelis might then introduce the intoxicated American lawman to an attractive, willing “female” friend, carefully leaving them alone. The trained tootsie would, if successful, seduce the American into sex. The cameras would clearly reveal all. Next day, the Israelis would assure him that they would protect their American friend from any of the events of the night before getting into the “wrong hands.” They would share sympathetically his apprehension that it might “get out.” They would assure him that so long as the Israelis could count on his being their friend, he was completely protected. The lawman would go back to America, vaguely aware that he had just sold his soul to the devil.

If one multiplied this hypothetical American by, perhaps, forty years of Israelis hosting American lawmen, then one can see a substantial part of American lawmen being unduly influenced by their Israeli counterparts.

Back in the days of slavery in the Western Hemisphere, Jews developed a successful, enriching triangle of business. Some Jews would obtain African slaves from a tribal leader whose people practiced limited slavery. He would be paid well enough that he’d order his “soldiers” to get more slaves from other nearby tribes. Meanwhile, the merchant Jews transported the obtained slaves to sugarcane plantations, which other Jews had started or subsequently obtained. In time the slave-trading merchants would sell their slaves for sugarcane in a barter operation. This sugarcane would then be taken to rum distilleries in Rhode Island, where they were bartered for kegs of rum. The kegs of rum were taken to West Africa and exchanged for slaves. Thus, the profitable cycle of the triangular business arrangement would continue to grow.

I suspect that the Israelis have in mind another beneficial triangular scheme in mind by importing American lawmen, teaching them the Israeli way of doing things, and sending them back to America to practice what the Israelis teach. The Israelis may be using these American lawmen as a sort of Trojan Horse by which to gain a better hold on the USA. Although it is not clearly worked out in my mind, I do believe that, as American military men and intelligence people seem to be invited over to Israel for conferences on matters of mutual interest as well (and feted and schmoozed), perhaps the third leg of the “triangle” is located in the northern Levant.

However that tangential issue finally plays out, the immediate ramification of American federal and local lawmen going to Israel to learn how the Israelis quell problems with Palestinians may have an important bearing on why American cops seem to use brutal and even lethal force on African American citizens all too quickly.