ANNE FRANK - AGAIN?!

While riding about fair Northern Virginia, I heard a report on the radio that a Hollywood group planned to make a new movie based on the Anne Frank "diary." The author in question is a little girl. She is seemingly a winning little girl, judged from her real words. She wrote her diary after the fashion of a little girl. She used crayons and the like. Her words were written large. As it is, it could have make her an endearing figure.

Unfortunately, the little girl was exploited by her own family. A professional writer was hired to "polish" and "elaborate" the humble diary of Anne Frank. He used a ball-point pen to "expand" Anne Frank's diary. Ball-point pens hadn't been invented at the time Anne Frank wrote her diary. Further, the family tried to cheat the writer out of his money, and he had to go to court to get paid. He was vindicated in court, although I'm not certain that he ever received full compensation. Winning in court is one thing; collecting what you won is another.

Now, this new movie about Anne Frank might be interesting, if it focused on the exploitation of the little Jewish girl by her family and subsequently by Holocaust-pushing members of Jewry. Realistically, "truth-in-packaging" will never come out of Hollywood. Hollywood is about money, entertainment and propaganda. Due to the latter element, Hollywood would be better named "Hooeywood."

If this new Anne Frank movie comes into being, then it will be done to suit the Jewish purposes of continuation of the myth of the Holocaust, of continuation of the myth of extraordinary persecution of innocent Jews, of continuation of the myth of the "special evil" of the German people, and of offering additional support to the final solution of the German Problem - genocide through miscegenation. Hence, the "reunion of the two Germanies, the guest worker program, and the refugee/immigration program take on a strategic and evil master plan. It was such a successful plan that one sees it now as a standard policy set by elite cosmopolitans for countries from Greece to Ireland - and beyond.

Last night I watched a Netflix-provided movie called "Street Kings." It has much violence and profanity. Keenu Reeves starred as a cop given to being a "gunshooter." He is denounced by all variety of hoodlums as "white boy." This is Hollywood's typical mischief, as Mr. Reeves is clearly the fruit of miscegenation himself.

The issue here - I hasten to add - is that the various branches of European people have a right to be, and to live as, a people. Rich, Royal, Masonic and/or Jewish people don't have any more right to plot their genocide than the Nazis had the right to plot the genocide of the Jews, if they indeed did so. The latter proposition I don't believe, as there is no sound evidence that makes it credible. As stated, there are repeated statements of a hate-filled and genocidal type by elements within Jewry toward Germans and toward white people.

Having stated this, I acknowledge the given: Jews deny all [they are never censored as "deniers"]. Everyone is against them. There are vast industries operated by non-Jews, creating fraudulent documents that are alleged to be the work of Jews. These were done strictly to defame the innocent Jews. Hate-filled "Christians" and/or neo-Nazis conspire against these gentle, talented people.

Interestingly, prominent members of Jewry across modern times have hoved to this same theme of hostility toward European, or White, people. Illustrations of this have been read into the Congressional Record and have been published. People never believe these. That any people could think this way seemed too far-fetched to credit. All such alarums are dismissed as prejudiced and anti-Semitic.

In America only "terrorists" are considered to be possibly evil. Curiously, Menachim Begin once snorted: "Terrorism - we [Jews] invented it!"

The Romanov family would back up Begin's statement - were they alive.

SEPARATION OF SYNAGOGUE AND STATE

The unfortunate trend toward the union of Synagogue and State in the United States must come to an end by a public disavowal of the Jewish religious imperative Tikkum olam ("repair of the world"). It is the driving force in American foreign policy and permeates the once largely Anglo-Saxon Common Law Tradition, founded on the Bible. The Jewish Law of the Repair of the World is based on rabbinic interpretations, which placed them in the position of "molders & shapers" of the lesser breeds.
With such concepts one can easily see how Jewish influence penetrated Great Britain, eventually taking command of the now domesticated John Bull. Once the sons of Canaan and Esau had played their role of Uriah Heep successfully enough to hold most of John Bull's IOUs, then the knighthood of Boy George, David Bowie and Elton John was inevitable.
For many decades the British royalty has placed their financial eggs with the Jewish foxes to invest, and this pitiful dependency symbolized the yoked John Bull. It is only a matter of short time before the sovereign of Great Britain is from some Jewish house made a peer in the 19th Century.
All of this sort of thing may resurrect, or at least reinforce, the Merovingian drive to be proclaimed "King of Jerusalem," capital city of the World Government.
With Great Britain and Europe obviously courtiers of their sovereign, "Collective Jewry," can one expect Americans to refuse a ride on the "bandwagon?" Probably not. However, the renouncing of the union of Synagogue and State by the Democrat-Republican Central Committee would be a hopeful sign.
Since Justice Ginzburg is said to read from the Talmud daily, she would not likely vote against the lawfulness of the the conjectured union. Nor would Justice Breyer find fault in such a union. Nor would any of the Masonic justices be likely dissidents, as they believe that "lodge brothers" outside American territorial jurisdiction should be heard from before the Brotherhood of the Supreme Court "gets a grip" on the issue.
With the U.S. supreme Court lined up in favor of the union of Synagogue and State, concerned citizens might well turn to Congress. Lots of luck!
Further, count on Big Business to look favorably on this event. Why not? Many are led by people who are not Americans, or who have dual citizenships, or who graduated from Ivy League schools, such as the Great Yezhivah, Harvard University, and who are "ravening dogs" for global government. Folks, they are too big for America. The world is their oyster.
Is there any hope for John Q. Public?
Yes, civil war in the Great Synagogue as fanatical factions seize each other's throats, and, like the Gingham Dog and the Callicoe Cat of the tale, tear each other to shreds.

GUNS AND ANGER

Today, as I was driving in Northern Virginia, listening to my radio, I heard that there had been a shooting at the Holocaust Museum. As the reports issued from several different people, one was immediately aware that things were sketchy. Apparently, two security guards had been shot by an intruder, who may well have had others in mind as targets. The intruder had been shot. He and a security guard were rushed to the same hospital. George Washington University Hospital. The reports indicated they both might be in critical condition. Further, the museum had been evacuated and closed to the public. A spokesperson announced that the museum would be opened again to the public on Wednesday, the 11th of June.

What is going on here? What could the motivation be?

A very singular aspect of this is that the intruding shooter was in his 80's. It is true that in eighty years one might develop some serious grudges, but this is a bit much. In listening to the reports, the identity of the man was known. He had been a "captain" of a PT-Boat during World War II. As far as I know, that probably means that he was an U.S. Navy officer fighting in the Pacific Ocean arena. He earned four medals for courage. He ended his service as a lieutenant. As far as I know, he may have know John F. Kennedy, who also served on a PT-Boat, when he served in the Pacific war zone, if, indeed, that is where he served.

Further, according to the radio news reports, this shooter had entered the grounds of the Federal Reserve facility on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C., carrying some kind of firearm on one occasion. I cannot recall if this event was in the 70's or one of the flanking decades. It was viewed as a serious infraction. He was sentenced to prison, where he stayed as an inmate for seven years.

So, what do we know? He appears to be a warrior. He appears to be a man who will act upon a belief. He has suffered, has experienced death in wartime, and has spent a lengthy stretch in hard-time. [No one who takes a gun "after" the Federal Reserve will go to "Club Fed."] Prison wasn't likely to be an improving experience. It seems likely that whatever grudges he held against the Establishment generally and/or Jewry, particularly, could not have been ameliorated with incarceration. Why not? Was there no psychological help provided in seven years? Did not the experts perceive a man who might rightly be called a "time-bomb?" Isn't it strange how men such as this shooter are never perceived by these experts whose penal skills have undoubtedly been improved with F.B.I. "profiles" and "psychological analyses" of similar offenders?

Whether this man is married with family, I cannot say. He may be an altogether isolated individual. If the latter, he may have reached out "not wisely but too well." With no one willing, or even interested in, his "grudges" he found himself aligned with society's "costumed bizarre" elements. Unrealistic visions may have seemed more valid, where there were others to share the dream (whatever it is).

For an old, patriotic American who is coming to the end of his days, perhaps mostly alone, the news of ancient men being manacled and sent to Germany as criminals for "crimes" against humanity was too much. He saw men, who were gray, wizened and hunched, sandwiched between hulking "men in black," guarding lest he "make a break for it." He may have seen that these antique men had been accused of 36,000 infractions against humanity, while guarding inmates in a concentration camp, many of whom were Jews. He may have felt some unrealistic association with such men's fate.

How does an old warrior express himself at such times? If his vision was delusional, so were the visions of many another. American soldiers are said to be committing suicide at unprecedented rates in Iraq and Afghanistan. Is that basically what this shooter was doing? His actions seem entirely consistent with those of a warrior who knew that his mission would not ever allow him to return home again.

In the Theatre of the Absurd the unreality of the shooter's vision embraced the bete noir of Jewish delusion-incarnate. Insanely, it was the innocent who suffered most. In the madness many never saw the blood.

Outside, another unreality was forming, as newspeople from around the world hastened to the Holocaust Museum and/or George Washington University Hospital to begin weeks of neverending reportage, while a massive traffic jam had formed from the mall to the 14th Street Bridge past the Pentagon, past Shirlington, past Alexandria to the "mixing bowl" of Springfield.

Nothing could easily dislodge this event from Prime Time. As with the trial of Charley Manson, horror and entertainment will surely vie for the public's understanding of this events.

AN OPEN BLOG TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

Mr. President:

Show me the money! There is no point in your pretending to be President of all the people of the United States of America, when, in fact, you are merely the "pal" of all the big banks, investment houses, and corporations too big to fail because they are so heavily invested in a worldwide web of derivatives that they must be propped up on the collective backs of the people. Let them fail & fall. It will only cost you your financial friends, but why should you need a set of proven incompetents?

Oh, I know! You politicians have given the bankers the sole power to create money for the citizenry, so, if we are to regain a healthy level of liquidity, it is the banks that must do it. Your hands are tied by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, you say? Rubbish!
Instead of pretending to be "Lincolnesque," why don't you be Lincolnesque in fact. How? Have your Democrat Party peers pass legislation to issue two trillion dollars in "green backs" which are full, legal tender and which can be used (and must be accepted) by the citizenry for payment of all debts, whether public and private. Pay this money directly and indirectly to the citizens of the country through the Small Business Administration's issuance of interest-free, twenty year grants to America's small businesses. Pay it directly to senior citizens (62 years old or older) as a "Thank You" dividend, as they are the ones who, despite the destructive "policies" coming out of federal and state governments, kept the nation moving forward. Through the office of the Surgeon General, provide funding for the nation's ill who are unable to cope with the costs. Using the Army Corps of Engineers and other federal offices, pay it directly and indirectly to the companies and people involved in infrastructural work so broadly, deeply needed in this country. Surely, there are other sensible ways of putting those "green backs" into the hands of the people.
The recipients of these "green backs" will then put their money into the banks of their choosing. Hence, your beloved banks would, in fact, soon have the funds deposited in them. As the deposits are "on call" by the people, rather than loans to the people "on call" by the bankers, there is a good chance that the bankers won't go immediately irrational in their banking procedures. With "money in the bank" the people will lead the nation out of its present problems by the simple method of spending the new money in the many diverse and mundane ways that living in America demands. This allows money (a nation's blood) to work itself through the "body politic."

In short, Mr. President, fund the small businesses and the people (as noted above) of America and get out of the way. Go play "b-ball" because your problems will be over domestically, and you can relax. As for the failing big banks, America is used to disaster from hurricanes, tornadoes, forest fires, floods, and worse; they can handle the demise of Citicorp. Can your European pals? Can you?

TOXIC ASSET???

Recently, the Obama Administration's Secretary of the Treasury spoke of the urgent need to remove toxic assets from the ledgers of our most important banks. One reason to do this, stated Treasury Secretary Geithner, is to "encourage" them to lend money again. Why is it important to have them lend again? Because the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 removes the money creation process from the amateurs at the Department of the Treasury and the Bureau of the Mint and places it with the professional "money men" in the American private banking system.
The passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 put the nation into the Era of the Moderns. Our money system would be scientifically managed. No longer would Americans be hostage to "boom-or-bust" cycles. About five depressions (1920, 1930, 1980, 1992, and 2008) and several recessions later, Americans wonder if there may be something wrong with the concept of "scientifically managed money." Maybe, a few wonder, it would be better to go back to the original concept in the U.S. Constitution of the federal government printing the nation's money free of interest burden, which interest burden the present system embraces. The needful money could easily be injected through a series of regional federal banks located in each state, from which necessary funds could be drawn to build and repair infrastructure, build and repair dams, build and repair alternate energy facilities, build and repair railroads, waterways and everything which is infrastructural, para-infrastructural, or useful and needful. The federal government could lead the way in paying a truly fair wage to its workers, based on the requirements to live decently for one day. This would not include ugly Republican concepts such as tomato ketchup soup. It is not inflationary to pay to build assets for the nation, such as bridges and dams. It is not inflationary to pay laborers a decent wage. It is not inflationary to invest in our elderly people's welfare by paying a decent social security payment. In the last case the payment should be based on what is needed to live decently, not on what the individual paid into the system.
On the other hand paying "gamblers" a trillion dollars to replace the roll of dough they just "blew" by a combination of greed and foolishness cannot be justified. Instead, give that trillion directly to the American people and then tell them to deposit thier money in the bank of their choice. Let the people choose who wins or loses, not pals of the banking speculators, such as Geithner.

How could an asset be toxic? Behold deceitful terminology at work in the Obama administration.
Will Barack Obama follow Abraham Lincoln or Paul Warburg and that crowd? Where do you think the bankers are placing their bets?

OBAMA DEFINES THE "CHANGE" HE BRINGS

There need not be any caution in regard to discerning the meaning of change Mr. Obama plans to bring to America. He stated what it is. He brings precisely the same policy progression as the Bushes, Clinton, Reagan and Carter. He is finishing off "America the Bankrupt" under an expanded spending program. It hardly matters that W. did his injury through war and the funding of a real estate bubble through the very institutions which created the bubble, and Obama plans to fight a new "war on poverty" funded by the banks that created the impoverishment of America through usury and fractional banking (a premier engine of monetary expansion to begin with).

As this form of "money creation" seems to have developed in Babylon (an author write a book he entitled The Babylonian Woe), it is not startling to discover that the primary preservers of this system over the last twenty-five hundred years have been elements of the Jewish population, especially the Sephardim. The twin Jewish gifts to Europe and the world have been money changing/usury and the cabala (the latter being somewhat familiar to all the "mystery religions"). They invented neither but perceived the power available through each and ran with it. The Jews possess good intelligence which over many hundreds of years honed and, where possible, broadened it.

Utilizing these gifts, Jews were able to convert some sharp nonJewish minds to the "mysteries" of the cabala, which, in effect, let loose fecund "termites" to undermine Christianity. On the other hand Jews led elements of the royal and aristocratic establishment in Europe more and more into the practice of accepting adventagiously priced loans on the one hand and relying on Jewish advisers to be "stewards" of increasing portions of their money. This eventually led to the first national central bank in Europe, the Bank of England.

The lessons learned from this experiment in money creation led to the development of other central banks across Europe. As the European Royalty tended to cross-pollinate, news of the great "windfall" of money had by the Royals and some other nobility must have gotten around. One expression around Cromwell's time was "Drunk as a Lord." The inebriated are not known for their discretion.

In the developing expertise of Jewish financiers was the technique of loaning to the sovereign forms of money which were collateralized by the labor of the poor. It is this process which ultimately broke the back of the American Promise to all its citizens. Every citizen of America has an equal share of the national debt but not an equal share of the national wealth. Most American citizens have a negative worth, when the national time-bomb is factored into the equation. The national debt should be tiered, so that rich individuals such as Donald Graham would bear a burden equal to 95% of his gross wealth, while the impoverished would bear the burden of one-half what they can beg on a given day.

Of course, there was never any need to have a gigantic national debt to begin with. Since it is people such as Donald Graham, whose rabbinic ancestors helped to develop the system known as the "Babylonian Woe," and who helped to undermine the Constitutional method by which the federal government spent needed currency into the economy through useful projects, affording gainful employment in the process, and issued under its sovereign power as legal tender. By this means banks are not really required as extraordinary national engines, pumping money into the economy by means of loans. This latter technique requires that the money in circulation can never cover all debts, as the aggregate is issued with an interest burden, and any new money appropriated to cover past debts is itself issued at interest, creating a shortfall by the weight of the difference.

The men behind the "bankers' coup d'etats" included men who were motivated by greed. However, among their banking numbers were men motivated by a sense of destiny to create a "New World Order." Since such men could not openly achieve their desire, as it required the treasonous assassination of the nation (here, U.S.A.) to achieve the world government desired, they operated "by way of deception." Further, since their absolute numbers were small, to attempt to achieve their aim rapidly by violence was very risky. Nevertheless, the Russian Revolution briefly afforded the exhilarating thought of "world revolution, now!"

Saner heads realised that by using central banks, usury, and fractional banking, they would not need armies of soldiers to conquer the world. They would use politicians and economists to gradually, bloodlessly (more or less) create their long-dreamed-of New Order. Using the educational system, youngster could be raised to feel that they had a vested interest in "the system." For most this meant becoming the "collateralized labor." By this means the sovereign citizenry of America, as envisioned by the Constitution, have become "sharecroppers" at best. Their crop is, of course, debt. The holders of that debt are the New American Sovereigns.

The problem with the American economy is the technique by which money is created. It should NEVER be issued through private banks, which have regularly and annually abused their privileged position. The Establishment defends this form of money creation because it is the very means by which they maintain their group hegemony. They created the "science" of economy to be its "Temple Guards."

Money should be spent into the economy by the federal government without any interest burden at all. The money injected into the economy becomes the pool of legal tender. It expands as needful projects are undertaken. Ultimately, the pool will redistribute, as some are energetic and idea-driven and will develop businesses to market these ideas, while others will decline to work much and become the lower class. As Christ noted: "The poor ye will always have with ye." Put another way, "You can bring a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

Inequality is a law of nature. The unnatural people of the New World Order deny this fundamental truth, but Truth will find a way!

Mr. Obama has appointed a rabbi, Rahm Emanuel, as his "chief of staff." He is hastening to add additional Jews, Freemasons, retreads from past administrations, and generally trekking along in the Jimmy Carter "era of change." Incidentally, the rabbi is an elected representative to Congress, and he was a high appointee within the Clinton Administration, prior to that. W. also appointed a rabbi to high executive position, Ari Fleisher, who was the official spokesperson for the president to the White House Press, and others.

This is not to say that all rabbis, or, indeed, all Jews, hold the same views. There is, however, clear evidence from the unfolding of history itself that a powerful force within Jewry has worked consistently to achieve a common, messianic vision.

That Capitalism and Communism were both dominated ideationally, as well as by "chief executives," "supreme councils" and "round tables," by this alluded to element is clear by roll-call and observation of their effect upon policy. All the top leaders of the Russian Revolution were Jews (often changing their names Madeleine Albright-style to conceal their origins). Stalin appointed Jews to head every Warsaw Pact nation, with Tito being "non-aligned." One Jewish family, the storied Rothschilds, were said by their own sanctioned family biographer to be richer than any European nation at the time, and, indeed, specialized in loans to nations. The weren't the only Jewish families operating at the time, as the Warburgs can attest. And The Washington Post Company's Donald Graham would certainly want his ancestral firm, Lazard Freres, to be mentioned, along with its leading family, the Franco-Jewish Davids.

When Ms. Shehan tried to speak to elected officials about the war in Iraq and the death of her son, very few prominent ones made themselves available. Yet, when the American-Israel Political Action Committee [AIPAC] held an annual powwow, over 60 U.S. Senators showed up and struggled among themselves in regard to who got to kowtow first. Jews provide over 50% of the donations to the Democrat Party. Only the ill-educated at the hands of America's educators would fail to realise that "the man who pays the piper calls the tune."

The term "disparate results" has no meaning or application when it comes to Jews. All federal courts and the Supreme Court can be counted on to find a pretext why disproportionate numbers of Jews in government and industry are "Constitutional." Probably the "holocaust."

It is these people who will guide President Obama, whose absentee record as an elected official suggests that he'd prefer the glamour of the job, leaving the policy construction to "his White House staff" and appointed Cabinet secretaries. Hence, the "same crowd" will continue to do what they've done for every president since my birth during the WW II, work to achieve Tikkun olam.

LIFE IS GOOD

I find the "street" a very rewarding place. I can't say precisely when it occurred to me that the "street" was bountiful, but at some point it happened: The Epiphany. The "street" is a "way" by which blessings are provided to those with "eyes to see." I have found folding money on the "street." Maybe a five dollar bill and a few ones. The cash is RIGHT THERE. I need only reach down to pick it up. This is so excellent! Ever since the moment when I realised that something special had just occurred, I have received my "allowance" from the "street." I have never worked in my life. Why work when the "street" provides for all my needs? Dimes and quarters are strewn about the "street" with a generosity that truly moves me. The "street" provides me with bus and subway fares. The "street" feeds me--not after the unwholesome diets of the "bigwigs"--but with the Earth's true bounty. I eat carrots, nuts, berries, milk, eggs, and a variety of green "veggies." I am not married. I have no children. Therefore, I am free to adopt nature and wander this Earth, taking care of my "adoptive children." The "street" offers me my "social security." It is true that a cashless and changeless world would alter my lifestyle. Yet, there have always been "hobos" who have always found a way to "make it." So, I keep my eye lowered--not due to the vanity of false modesty--but to glean from the fields ("street") my daily needs. Life is good!