INTERNET SABOTAGE

Recently, I complained about my problems with hackers and/or government saboteurs taking control of my computer to frustrate efforts at blogging or for the sheer pleasure of observing me watch with amazement as my monitor went crazy with rapidly opening and closing windows, displaying menus, applications, etc. They (my unsolicited co-pilots) are still here, and I have no idea when they will manifest themselves. However, when the more adolescent/juvenile minds among them are given freedom to "do their thing," the events are certain and frequent. Some level of adult (probably a fedcop) is normally present. If the adolescent/juvenile is present, they are not restrained. There is the impression that they operate under the emblem of a higher power than the fedcop does. That can only mean he, or they, are Jewish and connected.



Now, this is supposition, but it is also almost certainly true. One can look at any recent U.S. president and note the many Jewish advisers, cabinet officials, and high-office appointees. They are not there for love of the Jews necessarily; love for and fear of money would be more like it. Billy Jeff Clinton appointed more than 50% of the high-office vacancies to Jews. Jews provide the Democrat Party with over 50% of the donated money it receives.  

Why would Jews care about a blog written by a little bitty American? They deeply resent any criticism. That fact may be missed by those accustomed to a "horse-laugh-it-off" approach. There happens to be no category of people on Earth who employ the word "hate" as much as the Jews. This should not be assumed an indication of righteousness on the part of Jews. Frequently it is aimed at individuals.

I have to admit to have studied Jews a bit. I have read what they have said about themselves and others. I have read what others have said about them.

Although most American know very little about Jews, assuming them to a range from Biblical characters to stand-up comedians, they rarely venture any real criticism. The vast majority either follow the late Rev. Jerry Falwell approach of saying no ill about Jews (fear of violating the Abrahamic covenant!!!) or the Rev. John Hagee approach of prolix praise.

As the actor Mickey Rooney once observed, "when you let other people take care of your business, you're out of business." Basically, that is the story of the decline of America. The "sons of the pioneers" handed the government over to "advisers."

Naturally, given the chance to seize power, the advisers did just that. Having gained power, they began to set up mechanisms to protect themselves, even as they also grasped for more power.

Propaganda by means of the media, entertainment, and educational tools, such as textbooks, teachers, principals, etc, helped create a "good press," while directing American minds at targets they should despise. These targets were typically enemies (aka, opponents) who were guilty of "hate," and other modern social disabilities. The opponents of the "advisers" never merely oppose; they always "hate."

As the Reverends Falwell and Hagee could have told you, "that's not love." "Love" of course is what "it's all about."

A blogger such as I who criticizes Jewry goes on Jewish "enemies lists." Organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ("ADL") and the Southern Poverty Law Center keep an eye out for such enemies, making lists thereof, and informing the various fedcops and media. Then, Homeland Security announces it has uncovered data on growing numbers of "people who hate" and have put them on its "domestic terrorist watch list." That is how a blogger such as I can be "watched" without warrant or specific warning. Such observers would not interfere with Jewish "cyber-protection leagues."

Such organizations always defend their dirty deeds by allusion to their bogus "holocaust."

I recently received a mailing from American Free Press ("AFP") requesting donated help, after a near fatal attack on their website (americanfreepress.net). Since this small media outlet is an America First citadel in a land of New World Order robonews outlets, zionist and Israel First interests do not wish it well. The attack on the American Free Press website can be compared to the attack on the US Liberty, the American intelligence ship attacked in 1967 by the IDF. It was devastating but the enemy did not prevail, due to the courageous defense offered by the Americans.

In the letter from AFP there was an allusion to the attack launched against Pat Buchanan's website. The implication was that websites that criticize Jewry or Israel tend to be targets for "hate-crime hackers."

I can only state a sense that this implication is correct. Buchanan has denounced anti-Semitism, as has AFP. I don't, since the term is used consistently by Jewish organizations, as well as noteworthy individuals, in the sense of opponent.

Opposition to a Jewish proposition is usually characterized as "hate." Europe has several academic types in jail, and heavily fined as well, for printing or orating views harmful to the "holocaust" assertion. Jewish interests have made the facts "irrelevant," since these people were accused of causing a race or religion to suffer embarrassment and disrespect before the world community. Hence, although what these jailed men said were factual evidence, which were not defeatable by Jewish "intellectuals," they were guilty anyway. As one German judge pointedly noted, "the truth of the statement is irrelevant."

That sort of thing was the reason that George Orwell wrote his novels of political warning. He had encountered that sort of thinking amongst the revolutionary socialists with whom he had shared a period of solidarity prior to his disaffection.



Today, America has Senator Joseph Lieberman and others trying to curtail the irresponsible freedom of the Internet. Media such as The Washington Post are acceptable voices on the Internet, but American Free Press is not. However, bloggers, such as I, are thought to be the real problem.

I blog under several names on different web hosts. I don't strive for material omission as a characteristic of my blogs. However, since few feel compelled to "cover" the most powerful and unruly element in the world, I give it a go.

That is reason enough for the "advisers" to proceed against me. J'accuse!

After the Inslaw software Promis was developed by the Willams, contracted for by the Department of Justice, and the uncontracted for "improved Promis" software stolen during the Ed Meese tenure as Attorney General, it was only a matter of time before it was "tweaked" to provide a spying "backdoor" to virtually any computer.

Since the fedcops have already begun citing their "fears" to their favorite media-mouths of "domestic terror" and "homegrown terror," Internet cyber-spying and "dirty tricks" are now assured as a federal government clandestine policy. Attacks by drone cyber-missiles launched from a plethora of websites is certain.

Interestingly, the fedcops are capable of using "false-flag" websites whereby to mislead the American public regarding the actual origins of the attack. Today, radical Muslim organizations will probably be accused. The probably dead Osama bin Laden has already been magnified to the size of Dr. Manhattan.

However, a real opponent might be the Peoples Republic of China, whose long-time cozy relationship with Jews and Israel have made it the beneficiary of all high-tech American developments the Israelis could steal either directly or through zionists. This state of affairs goes back at least to the '80s, as the old Liberty Lobby tabloid, The Spotlight, featured articles on this dangerous state of affairs. (Incidentally, The Spotlight was attacked relentlessly in the courts by the ADL, by "holocaust" propagandists, and by agents of the C.I.A., such as the late Howard Hunt, and eventually put out of business. Morale: Deep pockets prevail at law.)

Hence, the preparations and precedents have been set to annihilate opposition, while completely flimflamming Americans in regard to the real purpose. The attack on my computer is merely a "drop in the cyber-bucket" at what lies ahead. 

 

AMERICA THE TERRIBLE

I heard on the radio news that fedcops are increasingly on "red alert" in regard to "home-grown" terrorists. One area that seemed to be especially worrisome was the Internet. The Obama Administration is now on the look-out for "Websites Of Mass Destruction." 

These websites report things such unwanted data and theories about 9/11, the "Holocaust", Iraqi oil, Afghanistani opium fields, depleted uranium, the massacre of US Liberty, legal tender, immigration, and the like. The fedcops have been deployed to prepare a blizkrieg of such dangerous sites that pose such a threat to the Establishment's Rule By Material Omission.

There were rumors that Senator Lieberman would soon present a bill to limit the internet to zionists, whether Jewish, Muslim, or "Christian." The Pentagon was rumored to be experimenting with what it called a "Kosher Internet."

Once a responsible Internet has been established, then the threat from Websites of Mass Destruction will be much lessened.

In the meantime America's intelligence agencies, working with fedcops and state police, hope to hack into as many terrorists websites as possible, using the sort of young, arrogant minds that built Facebook as their battering rams, to seek and destroy "the enemy."

As was rumored among "ruling circles" for years, the people deserve only appearances. Since major media controls appearances, the people are assured of material omission on every big story. Still, one can't be too careful. On any given day, a terrorist may plant a set of facts on the Internet, and thus threaten our way of life.

For that reason a grateful Barack Obama turns his heads to his IT Hack-Attackers and says: "Greetings, Rosenkrantz and gentle Guildenstern!" 

 

IT'S THE MONEY CREATION, STUPID!

President Obama continually states that he has done just about everything humanly possible to "jump start" the economy. He has greatly enriched Wall Street banks and other large banking and financial institutions. Surely they will soon loan enough of this money to industry - both large and small - to promote job-creation.

Why should these large banks invest these funds given to them by Uncle Sam in the name of the people in risky enterprises, when they can take this money and put them in Treasury bonds where they can safely double or triple their money? They can borrow additionally money from the "Federal" Reserve at near zero interests and invest this in U.S. bonds (or other relatively safe bonds) and double or triple their money.

They exist, as do bloodsucking parasites (bedbugs, leeches, ticks, et al), and there is little reason to free themselves from Uncle Sam's body and risk the dangers of finding other hosts. Only after swelling to immense size will they take a risk, usually setting up the next cycle of increasingly bad loans.

President Obama hasn't come close to tackling the problem, as the problem is systemic. It is founded on the originating of money through private banks in a system that creates about 90% of it monetary aggregates by means of debt. The U.S. provides the "Federal" Reserve with bonds as collateral for "cash" which are merely ledger creations out of nothing.

Commercial banks take 10% (or whatever the reserve figure required) of all deposits and set that amount aside as a "Federal" Reserve deposit. They loan out the other 90%, if they choose to do so. This created money ends up as a deposit in the originating bank or another, and goes through the same process, the bulk of the funds reloaned. Hence, a pyramiding of "created money" takes place. Inevitably, a deflation of the "created money" occurs, as bad loans increasingly appear on bank books.

Instead of this complicated nonsense, the system should be changed to one in which the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the U.S. Bureau of the Mint in conjunction create positive legal tender. The whole of the American economy can easily adjust to it.

The money can be injected into the economy by means of infrastructural works paid for by the issuance of legal tender (as Abraham Lincoln did with his original "greenbacks"). It could also be injected through the Social Security Administration's Social Security and Medicare payments. The Defense Department could pay for its war equipment and personnel by means of this money.

All our relationships with foreign nations should be altered to reflect these changes. All our "connections" with the extra-American nations and companies/peoples were man-made by our "statesmen" and can be unmade by patriotic, wise statesmen. It is not a declaration of hostility toward the world beyond our shores, but that we place our interests first.

As part of the latter adjustment, tariffs should be applied to all products coming to our shores on the  basis of labor costs. Our workers should not be consigned to slave labor rates because our competition employs slave labor. American industry should not be obliged to flee America to survive. Equality of rates should be obtained by adjusting extra-national rates to reflect the rates our workers in the same or very similar industries are paid. This would also encourage the outside world to pay decent wages.

Lastly, American industry that operates entirely domestically should receive tax reductions, as compared to international corporations. In no case should an international corporation operating in the United States have lower taxes than an entirely domestic company.

All internationalist citizens should be encouraged to leave their property in America and go to England, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, et al, where they would reside among kindred spirits. 

President Obama was, is, and will always be a Wall Street and Lasalle Street agent. What he can squeeze in as an expression of solidarity with Karl Marx, he will no doubt do. He will never solve the systemic problem of negative money. He will only participate in the jump-starting of the next episode of inflating the debt-balloon. 

CIVIL WAR?

There is a Biblically-based bromide in regard to a "house divided." The force of the comment is that such houses cannot stand. Unfortunately, the Celto-Germanic population has accepted quite the opposite assertion: "Diversity means strength." A racially-based assessment of "house" is the proper way of looking at "house." A house is a place for a family. Families are typically  units of clans or tribes. Clans or tribes are typically units of nations. Nations are typically ruled by governments. The form of a government may be agreed upon mutually by the tribes or clans (and ultimately by the families), or it may be compelled by tyrantical force.

Since nations carry a difficult-to-escape racial foundation, an attack on the concept of "nation" is also an attack on the concept of "race."

Many times in history a powerful leader of a skilled army has conquered many nations and welded them into an unnatural governmental unit which has been termed "empire." The former nations have sometimes had a degree of autonomy returned to them by the conguering tyrant. Both Darius and Alexander the Macedon did this. In these cases the empire took on a feudal character where by the conquered nations provided tribute, certain services, including fighting men, and received the protection of the tyrant in return.

An empire is only as strong as the tyrant who leads it. The strength of nations rests upon its people. Therefore, strategically, miscreant advisers to tyrants, or functional tyrants, such as powerful secret societies, advise an attack on the people of any given nation.

In ancient Biblical examples whole groups of people, such as the Norther Kingdom of Israel, were moved to other areas, while their former territory was occupied by alien people, who typically were also forced to move into the vacated land(s). If a trouble-making group of people were moved from their accustomed homeland, then they would have to spend much time and energy trying to adjust to the new environment. That would tend to make them both more dependent on the tyrant and less of a problem, as they devoted energy to rationalizing their new homeland.

The last four hundred years in Europe and in their developing overseas arms (colonies) witnessed the decline of monarchs. There the idea developed that sovereignty resided in the people of the nation. This latter idea was most naturally and wholesomely expressed in the Republican form of government. The view that "kings" as a carnal extrapolation of the people and symbol thereof began to decline in favor of legislative bodies.

In regard to legislative bodies the ideal of noble-minded individuals meeting for purposes of lofty debates on the best course for the "ship of state" was soon exposed. Increasingly, legislatures became seen as sites where venal men took bribes from private interests or simply "ripped off" the public purse. Naturally, the Republican form of government became hostage to the plutocratic forces in the nation - and beyond.

Legislators continued to use the idioms of accepted, noble thought, but they were mere shells. Corruption has certain visible signs. The increase of national debt was one. The constant involvement in distant wars was another. The sheer length and density of legislature was another.

In regard to involvement in distant wars, this must be viewed in context. However, there could hardly be justification on a national basis for a string of such wars. In these the signature of the "merchants of death" should be apparent. They have the influence with "patriotic" politicians, with powerful sections of the military, and even with sections of organized labor. They also work hand-in-glove with the great banking interests, which are, today, international institutions not necessarily loyal to the nation in which they began.

As plutocratic power grew in America and Europe, its agents in secret societies infiltrated all major sectors of the nation's spiritual and material infrastructure to set up the mechanisms for imploding them. A New World Order required a new set of supporting structures; ones that secured the rule of the rich and their ideological "break-legs." The latter, assisted by communist hoodlums and/or civil protestors, provided the "law" to create order out of the chaos that they caused to occur in the first place.

The basic means whereby Western nations have been defeated by underlings yearning to be rich and powerful was provided by Mr. Charles Dickens in his novel DAVID COPPERFIELD. In the episode involving the vile Uriah Heep, the British and the world were warned prophetically of their danger. The high became low, and the low became high. Dickens' message was totally missed.

THE LAST COLONY?

The 20th century might well be considered the twilight of the colonial system of government. Most of the territory which European countries operated as colonies have been voluntarily or forcibly (or both) released to independence. Usually, this has been done with a deep bow to "democracy." If these independent "new nations" should see their governments transformed into dictatorships, the former ruling countries may decide to intercede at the request of "democratic forces" within the former colonies to give tyranny "whatfor." Soon thereafter, an exiled "leader" will be placed before the people for a vote. If the people vote for someone else, then the election will be declared "rigged" and "fraudulent." A new election will be arranged at the request of "democratic forces" by the former masters of the colony.

Jews operate the last territorial colony. The Israeli state in the Levant is actually a colony operated by World Jewry. In Jerusalem the modern Jewish center was situated to provide religio-cultural (political) guidance to the global Jewish nation. The global Jewish nation is the archipelago of Jewish communities across the globe. These communities are overwhelmingly situated in large urban areas.

The first Jews to this area were explicit colonizers. The Rothschild interests operated a number of concerns that utilized these "pioneers' " labor. Zionists organizations in Europe and America encouraged settlers to move to this new colony that surrounded and protected the long-desired center in Jerusalem. Collective farming and other businesses operated out of kibbutzim, manned sometimes by temporary Jewish volunteers, who might stay for a couple of years. Fund-raising helped to further the colonial effort. Still, the pace was slow because the life was hard.

Jews were doing pretty well in Europe, the British Commonwealth nations, and in America. Life was good. Going to jejune Palestine was "okay" as a visit -maybe have a picture taken on a camel - but to live? They needed that like another loch in kop.

Post-World War II changed everything. German reparations made possible long-term funding of a new Israeli state which, like the United Nations, was planned long before the end of WW II. Using political influence and newly assumed "moral authority," Jews were able to start a foreign aid program for the Israeli state that would evolve into annual multibillion dollar grants. Thus, an instant welfare state, known as Israel (sic), was created. Many Jews could now see moving to the Israeli state as a possibility.

Debt-mongering and usury became not only a means to become master of vast stretches of land across the globe through political control of the indebted citizens of many nations, it allowed the Jewish World Community to fashion a rich and militarily powerful Jewish state whose center, Jerusalem, became more and more the moral and legal arbiter of the world community. Roman Popes would humble themselves before the High Rabbi of Jerusalem. American Protestant leaders would pledge undying fealty to the Israeli state.

Still, all in all, and excluding the special case of Jewry, the days of colonial rule seem to be over. There have been new means of exploitation developed in the former master states. The premier means of exploitation nowadays is loans at usury to "developing" countries. Chattle slavery and indentured labor have given way to chronic, habitual bond-slavery. The citizens of today line up to sale their great-grand- children into bond-slavery. In America the citizens have moved from spending their children's inheritance in the '60s & '70s, to spending their grandchildren's inheritance in the '80s & '90s, to spending their great grandchildren's inheritance in the 2000s 2010s, and so on.

As with any colonial system, the wealth of the exploited land tends to collect in the coffers of the debt-mongers. These latter represent the masters of the "new colonial system" now operating. Everything depends on usury. It is usury and "fancy" maneuvering that made Goldman Sachs the leading edge of the scores of trillions of dollars of derivatives that have been floated.

As paper bondage floated toward the Western hoi polloi, real wealth floated to the masters of the new colonial system.

Just as Christianity could find a way to legitimize the European-dominated colonial system, so it has had no difficulty in blessing the "new colonial system" of debt and usury. Yet, most Christians aren't the benficiaries of this new system; for the most part they are victims. When Christian clergy are pinned in a corner, they will argue that the present system is the least objectionable of a series of bad options.

Although this would seem insane policy, if a clergy were dependent on tithes from congregations that were being made poorer by a colonial debt-n-usury system, the fact is that many denominations have heavy investments in stocks and bonds. They are more concerned with how their investment portfolio is doing than the general welfare of their congregations.

In a slave system there are usually two categories: slave master and slave. Yet, there is usually room for a tiny group of "freemen." These are debt-free tradesmen and the like. The most important of these are the procurors, who bring in more bond slaves for the masters. Religious leaders tend to be either procurors or vouchers for the "goodness" of the debt-mongers and usury.

Ultimately, the largest debt-mongers must devour the smaller ones. It can get pretty ugly.

DODGING INTERNET BOMBS

As many people know by now, the internet is a network full of "improvised explosives" which a variety of retrograde types set. Most people are by now well familiar with terms such as "malware" and "viruses." A recent phenomenon is internet bullying. The internet provides a veil which the incourageous can utilize to commit their brand of terror in typically anonymous fashion.

Using such "hit-n-run" or "improvised explosives," otherwise feckless people can imagine themselves powerful beings.

Regularly, the media references massive "hacking" attacks on the DOD or other government agencies and suggests that the perpetrator(s) may be from within, say, the Peoples Republic of China. At other times the attacked cyber-center may be part of a corporate entity. Motivation for such attacks range from espionage to juvenile "cyber-delinquencies." Occasionally, even "terror" is cited as the apparent motivation.

For ordinary internet users the typical advice is to install a good security program, which several companies offer. In so far as these companies make sure that their programs are updated regularly to defend against the latest lethal virus someone has dreamed up to "deep-six" your computer, your security program should protect your life on the internet.

Since the profile of potential attackers within the U.S.A. runs the gamut of sophisticated foreign cyber-attackers to fedcop dirty-tricks departments to secular, or private, dirty-trick departments to the neighbor cyber-twit, the source can be a real mystery. Those directly connected to an internet source such as cable may have some added protection.

However, those who operate on a wireless internet system may be vulnerable to a discreet, targeted interdiction by any of the above groups for any reason (to them) that seems good. For example, it is possible for the C.I.A. to have begun "testing" of the MK-Ultra type, using the Internet. Since it seems incredibly far-fetched, the likelihood is even better that it might be done. Few would credit the initial victims of MK-Ultra with pointing out a real danger. Instead, they would have been thought to be a little "paranoid." Given the drugs that the C.I.A. was using, they may, in fact, have been paranoidal. However, that would not make their assertions necessarily incorrect.

Humans are "guinea pigs" to leading political circles, not just in America, but throughout the world community. The wealthier the nation, the more diabolical the designs of certain ruling circles therein. The leading circles of poor countries tend to merely hack the hapless into pieces.

I frequently receive sudden messages while blogging or doing work on the Internet that "You have no internet connectivity." It can and did "bomb" certain work which I was doing but which had not been automatically saved. There was nothing for it but to start again. Do you pause to save every sentence? Maybe you wait until you finished a paragraph?

From my understanding of the wireless connection to the Internet, the user is availing himself/herself of a radio wave. Some sort of "band" which is transmitted at a certain range, frequency, etc., which is unique to that modem/router. Computerized devices that are part of the network should not have any problem linking up with it. Oh, maybe occasionally a explosion on the sun, or something, floods Earth with rays that disturb the air which is the medium for the waves in the band. Otherwise, within a house there should not be excessive regular interference.

However, during WW II, and thereafter, radio waves signals could be jammed. The U,S.S.R. and Warsaw Pact nations regularly jammed Radio Free Europe. I believe that the U.S.A. jammed Cuba radio transmissions. There are probably endless examples between nations of Jamming.

It is my view that jamming of wireless Internet connections is possible and is done. I believe that it is frequently done to my own. I believe that, while it is possible that elements of the fedcops, such as F.B.I. or Homeland Security, are not above doing these kinds of "dirty tricks," that the better likelihood in my case is that descendants of the ruling circles in the old U.S.S.R. or Warsaw Pact nations, who first descended upon America around the turn of the 20th Century and eventually gained dominant influence, having given some of their lesser offspring the task of "punishing" through "dirty tricks" the remnant of real Americans with old-fashioned, real American values, founded on Christianity, the Bible, and the practical experiences of living as Americans for hundreds of years (in my case 400 years).

Hence, while their "great men" go about with the heavy duty of operating the Tyranny of the Minority in America, their misbegotten children amuse themselves at the expense of America's righteous Lots. Jamming wireless transmissions would be such an amusement.

THE WAR AGAINST RACE

Robert Putnam, a Harvard political scientist, interviewed nearly 30,000 Americans in coming up with a report, E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century, which stated the obvious: white, blacks, Irish, Jews and all American ethnic groups prefer to live among and socialize with their own kind.

“The greater the diversity in a community, the less civic engagement it shows,” [Clarence] Page wrote of Putnam’s report. “Fewer people vote. Fewer volunteer. They give less to charity. They work together less on community projects.” And “they trust each other less,” Page admits, “not only across racial and ethnic lines but also within the lines. In other words, residents of the most racially and ethnically mixed neighborhoods show the least trust not only of other races but also people of their own races.”

Clarence Page is a black “conservative” columnist. Does he, then, believe that government should let people enjoy “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness?”

“Heavens to Betsy, no!” is Page’s hysterical reaction. The government must take military-style action to impose “diversity,” Page argues.
[citation from American Free Press, September 17 & 24, 2007, page 15, “AFP ON MULTICULTURALISM” by James P. Tucker, Jr.]

Does Mr. Page really want diversity, or does he really want its opposite? There is no compelling rationale for diversity within a political economy. Therefore, its artificial engineering by means of law fails the test of reasonableness. The marked willingness of the elite to use fixed bayonets to achieve for them what reasonable argument cannot suggests an ulterior motive. When all inequality is viewed as “undesirable” and even as “dangerous,” a society has positioned itself to walk through the doors of bedlam. The bell cows of looniness will guide it in. The doctors await. Can shock treatment be far behind?

This short article, appearing in the AFP issue cited above, delves into surely the most misrepresented and most certainly scholar-unfriendly area of today in America. The observer is asked to treat with respect and an “open” mind such competing propositions as “race is an illusion,” “race is observable,” “there is only one race,” and “there are at least several races, depending on definition.”

The system of defining creation is alleged to have begun in the “Garden of Eden” when Adam took on the task of naming the “flora & fauna.” That happens to be my anchor. In modern times the European Linnaeus provided the definitive base for biological ordering. Again, this is an anchor in my view of this subject.

The word “species” is derived from the Latin word, meaning “to see.” Therefore, the employment of this word requires first and foremost the ability to recognize and distinguish. When patterns amongst life forms within the flora & fauna manifest them, tend to be replicated through generations, involve groups that recognize one another and live together, and which, if they replicate sexually, do so within the group, such patterns may involve such species. Nature tends to be generally exclusive. Therefore, the black oak tends to replicate with black oak; the red oak tends to replicate with red oak; the white oak tends to replicate with white oak; and the pin oak tends to replicate with pin oaks. Do these ever have “mixed marriages?” The answer seems to be: Not very often, if at all. Nor is there a likelihood that the fruit of such “marriages” will long survive.

Of course, animal forms tend toward the same exclusivity, but not to the extent of plants. Mating between distinct variations, if not species, occur. Witness the occasional mix of lion and tiger, horse and zebra, etc. Of all the animal forms, humans are the most adventurous in this regard. On the animal level human tampering with nature is often the most essential factor resulting in, say, a horse-burro mix, a zebra-horse mix, a lion-tiger mix, and so on. There seems to be a curiosity within humans in regard to the question: “What happens when you cross…?”

For me, once again, Scripture and Apocrypha, provide an anchor. “As in the days of Jared…” Whether there are angels, whether some came to Earth “to teach men,” whether some of these taught the unnatural mixing of flesh, I cannot say. But some sort of misuse of nature, I believe, was occurring at that time.

In our time there can be little doubt that scientists across the globe are experimenting in the mix of flesh fit to make the Watchers of Apocrypha proud. We are advised by them and by industries which employ their techniques how wise and beneficial their “advances” are. In fact scientist are insisting for themselves a role consistent with that of a superior caste, whose work is not understood by the benighted masses and which work can not be abridged at all by these mere “children,” who are too ill-equipped to make such judgments.

Would it be absurd to suppose that they believe that cow’s milk squeezed from a banana is a sound idea? And many another such scheme as well? Although some may devise a stronger grain vis-à-vis a blight by this means, one gets the feeling that there are plenty of scientists in this field who have become “deranged” by the fantastic possibilities. I, for one, have no doubt that human experimentation, utilizing non-human genes, has occurred “big-time.”

If one can validly assert that there are highly intelligent men, scientists, men remarkably skilled, who are so convinced of the good of a project they envision, that they proceed with their work without undue concern for the views of the great bulk of their fellow citizens, then I think that we have stumbled across the very sorts who force discrete groups into special social chambers, where they can be artificially blended. Since such scientists try to operate in an objective and detached fashion, their very techniques tend to shear the human “guinea pigs,” or “specimens,” as the case may be, of their humanity. In the process of doing this, these scientists most certainly lose their own. Yet, in bedlam who notices insanity? In the brotherhood of the lab, what doctor puts sound ethics and morality before his experimentation upon Herr Mouse? Do their mouths and hearts act as one?

In regard to these “scientists,” alluded to above, we find a sort of hybrid mind at work. Such people seem to be blends of the scientific minds of the Age of Reason, as found in Europe, and the mystical mind of the Mystery Religions. One sees and notes the rational observation of form and structure, wedded to the incantations and symbols of the “golem-makers.” All in all, there seems to be a certain appropriateness here. These are the “sorcerer’s apprentices,” stirring up a New World Order. They need to produce a New Man to inhabit it. What choice have they but a global hybrid? What means other than government troops with fixed bayonets compelling it? With such an order can a Resident Evil be far behind?

SHAM-TEMPEST IN TEA PARTY

According to radio reports today, Tea Party demonstrators were gathered in the town where Harry Reid dwells, when not in washington, D.C. Sensibly, he welcomed the visitors and expressed the hope that they spend freely while in town, as the town and state could use an economic boost.

Leading the demonstrators were the likes of Sarah Palin, former governor of Alaska. That she is an opportunist seems a given, viewing her recent track-record. Wherever and whenever a ship of fools sets forth to sea, the helm tends to fall into the hands of predators, who put their private servants to work, guiding and controlling the ship. So it is with wounded, besieged America.

As with the U.S.S. Liberty, the American ship of state is being bombed and strafed. Destruction is the end-game.

Under these circumstances one would expect to see Senator John McCain and Sarah Palin, his former running mate, in prominent "leadership" positions. The dubious character and connections of Senator McCain have been raised enough in the past that he is somewhat known. Not so, Sarah Palin.

According to Texe Marrs in his March 2010 Power of Prophecy bulletin, Sarah Palin "was first 'discovered' by Jewish rabbis in Alaska. They reported their find to their Mossad superiors, and, Presto!, Palin moved right up to the Governor's suite. She promptly went over to Israel and was auditioned on Tel Aviv's popular The Tamar Jonah Show, Israel's equivalent of CNN's The Larry King Show. The Israeli press dutifully reported that Ms. Palin was 'The most pro-Zionist of all 50 of America's governors.' "

It goes to say that such credentials would impress John McCain's handlers. Both John McCain and Sarah Palin are "spiritual" dual-citizens, having the Israeli state as a "comfy" fall-back country, if they have to split.

Texe Marrs spent some time on the little-known Jewish connection to Palin. He identified witnesses to her true devotion. For example, he informed his readers that "The Chief Rabbi in Anchorage, Alaska, reported that Sarah Palin almost daily wore not an American flag pin, but an Israeli flag pin on her wardrobe. The Zionist authorities also boasted that the Jews' national flag, the satanic six-pointed star, also decorated the curtains in her Governor's office."

I have no qualms about Sarah Palin indicating where her heart calls home; however, I resent her pouncing on thin evidences of American patriotism and loudly, with the help of the media, trying to grab the steering mechanism. She's not alone, of course. To neutralize the Tea Party Movement, media-anointed "conservatives" popped up everywhere and almost at once. They all have money. They all are rabid supporters of the Israeli state.

Back in the '60s, Nelson Rockefeller was quoted as saying that he didn't worry about conservative Republicans or Democrats because they didn't have two quarters to rub one against the other. I paraphrase the quote but it is about exact and certainly has that sense.

Is no one suspicious about wealthy conservatives who denounce government spending, etc., but who are invariably stout supporters of the Jewish state. Frequently, they express approval of "nuking" Iran (or whoever has been designated the "demon nation" at the time by the Israelis). Who do they think comprised the intellectual force that turned "free-enterprise" America into the big-spending, big-borrowing, deconstructed, borderless, internationalist basket-case nation of today? Back in the '70s, President Nixon rued the U.S.A. becoming a "pitiful giant" that was full of nuclear weapons and unable to halt ragtag insurrectionists.

No one typically asks why any American politician would thinks that it is our duty to force the bullies of the world to behave? This nation doesn't produce the sort of politicians who could make Wall Street bullies behave. To do that this country would have had to produce Protestant ministers who charged their congregations to follow Jesus' example and drive the moneylenders out of the temple. Instead, thanks to Freemasonry's infiltration into the theological seminaries, brotherhood and tolerance are the watchwords. With these kinds of preachers the wicked need not fear being called a "viper." Perverted to the helt, they meekly beg, "Hurt me!"

To return to Texe Marrs, this brave fellow observed in his bulletin that "Impressed, the Israeli Mossad then sent American Jewish big shots like Connecticut's Senator Joseph Lieberman, former Clinton advisor (now a paid Fox News 'consultant') Dick Morris, and neocon journalist and Republican Party king-pin William Kristol (publisher, The Weekly Standard) over to Alaska on cruise ships and jets to audition her and check out her 'Israel First' loyalty. The Zionist lobbying giant, the militant American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), also got into the act."

Needless to say, Sarah Palin passed with flying colors (unfortunately, not those of the U.S.A.) and her meteroric rise was capped (temporarily) by her selection as running-mate to Senator John McCain. As you may recall, Senator Joseph Lieberman, McCain's pal, decided against running. Parenthetically, Sen. Lieberman has been described as a Jew who studies the Talmud, which is the religio-cultural constitution of the religious Jew, on an almost daily basis. Naturally, that would leave little time for studying the U.S. Constitution. Apparently neither McCain nor Lieberman believe that it is relevant in the era of "public policy."

A final comment from Texe Marrs' article:

"The very day that Sarah Palin spoke at the Republican Party nominating convention and gave that now famous speech with the clever line about putting lipstick on a pig, she had earlier met privately for almost three hours in her hotel suite with two Zionist power-brokers: Senator Joseph Lieberman and the head of AIPAC. Talk about putting lipstick on pigs!"

No movement can retain its America First, patriotic vitality, when it is led by Zionists. They have a completely different agenda. Either from the viewpoint of the late Vladimir Lenin or Zionism, the members of the Tea Party Movement are merely "useful idiots" to be channeled into the advancement of the Zionists' agenda.

CENSORSHIP

Recently, I noticed that a favorite blog I followed "bit the dust." Apparently, the issue was "taboo" subjects. The blog appeared on WordPress.com, and the blogger was Nomoonnight. He was not advocating adultery, incest, nor "man-boy love" societies. He did poke fun at the rich and powerful in America and the world at large. "Not good!" snarled the nabobs at WordPress.com. However, what really "ticked" them off was that his targets were often Jews. That is viewed as inherently anti-Semitic. "Why would anyone criticize the Jews?" asked the nabobs at WordPress.com, who are often - well, - Jews.

It is a fair question. My answer would begin with the fact that 3 or 4 percent of the American population has achieved dominance in regard to many areas of national policy-making. This same group has achieved dominance in the media and entertainment areas. This group has sliced off about 40 percent of Harvard University, if one combined faculty, administration, and student populations (but exclude maintenance workers). They are likewise a far heavier proportion of the human population at most of the prestigious universities. This group I reference is Jewry.

If this group was composed of "whites," Jews would be leading the cries of outrage about "disparate results." Jews are not concerned with disparate results if it targets Jews, although quietly amongst themselves they my voice concern. At a meeting of the Harvard Club there might be a "sheepish" grin. "Lots of Jews!" one might exclaim with a wink and chuckle.

Poor Chuck! He didn't know which way the wind blew!

For all his witty and ascerbic commentary about the rich and about Jewry, Nomoonnight "bought the bullet" by criticizing the "Holocaust." This exceedingly dubious proposition has devotees who treat "deniers" as if they were blaspheming "wackos." They have great power in Europe, as well as America.

To save Jews from shedding bitter tears on account of "doubters" attacking the proposition that the Hitler regime gassed six million Jews, they've had their trollops in every legislature in Europe, as well as Britain and its Commonwealth, outlaw "facts of science, engineering, chemistry, and architecture." Facts and evidence are not admissible as a defense against the charge lodged against "deniers" because they are "crimes against humanity." You see, the Jews were the alleged victims of the Holocaust and have longed wailed this fact to a world that they wish to make guilty. To deny the alleged facts as erroneous singles out Jewry as liars and worse. That's racist and anti-Semitic. In Germany Frau Merkel, a "former" communist, will throw you in jail for such blasphemy as "denying the Holocaust." As one German judge put it about two years ago, "truth is no defense against the law."

Some of you may be aware that the U.S.S.R., early in its creation, made anti-Semitism a capital offense. It helped that the "Russian" revolution was organized by, funded by, and commanded by Jews. Jews do protect their own interests.

This again was made plain by WordPress.com's "suspending" Nomoonnight's blog. They'll undoubtedly win the Myra Breckenridge Award from The Washington Post for "holocausting" Nomoonnight. That this was a Jewish targeting is without doubt. In the suspending process, they made plain that they would not "confer" about the reason that they found fault. They did not relate if it was a single blog, a single subject treatment, or anything else that offended them. They stated that they have rules which all submit to in registering for a blog. They stated that they aren't obliged to explain anything. They treasure their rules; and, if they think you, a blogger, violated one, they have the right to suspend you without ever going into the specifics nor allowing the blogger the option of correcting the "error(s)."

How do I know this? I know Nomoonnight. He's an "up front" sort of guy.

This blogger, Nomoonnight, had over a hundred lengthy pages & posts at his blog site, which were published at WordPress.com. Many were controversial. Whatever rule transgression appeared at his blog page, the nabobs of WordPress.com took the opportunity to make all the blogs unreachable. They are not to be read, enjoyed or thought about said the Great Censors; they are to be "deep-sixed" and never see the light of day again.

Folks, this is fear wedded to overweaning power. Be grateful that you're not a Jew, looking over your shoulders, wondering when your crimes will be discovered. Fear does crazy things to people. It's best to be a Euripidesian mensch. Let the rich and powerful worry about the gathering "wackos."

As many blog-hosting websites are controlled by Jews, there will undoubtedly be many other "suspended" blogs - until Jews can bring the sort of "law and order" to the internet which they have brought to Germany, Europe, the British Commonwealth and soon "The World Community."

As for the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, its application, as with true charity, is increasingly attenuated. I'm sure the supreme Court will "pick its spots" upon proper advisement. Blog-hosting websites will not be such a spot. Its spirit lives, but only in victims of its employment. "Freedom of thought" on blogs, - we hardly knew ye.