CIVIL WAR?

There is a Biblically-based bromide in regard to a "house divided." The force of the comment is that such houses cannot stand. Unfortunately, the Celto-Germanic population has accepted quite the opposite assertion: "Diversity means strength." A racially-based assessment of "house" is the proper way of looking at "house." A house is a place for a family. Families are typically  units of clans or tribes. Clans or tribes are typically units of nations. Nations are typically ruled by governments. The form of a government may be agreed upon mutually by the tribes or clans (and ultimately by the families), or it may be compelled by tyrantical force.

Since nations carry a difficult-to-escape racial foundation, an attack on the concept of "nation" is also an attack on the concept of "race."

Many times in history a powerful leader of a skilled army has conquered many nations and welded them into an unnatural governmental unit which has been termed "empire." The former nations have sometimes had a degree of autonomy returned to them by the conguering tyrant. Both Darius and Alexander the Macedon did this. In these cases the empire took on a feudal character where by the conquered nations provided tribute, certain services, including fighting men, and received the protection of the tyrant in return.

An empire is only as strong as the tyrant who leads it. The strength of nations rests upon its people. Therefore, strategically, miscreant advisers to tyrants, or functional tyrants, such as powerful secret societies, advise an attack on the people of any given nation.

In ancient Biblical examples whole groups of people, such as the Norther Kingdom of Israel, were moved to other areas, while their former territory was occupied by alien people, who typically were also forced to move into the vacated land(s). If a trouble-making group of people were moved from their accustomed homeland, then they would have to spend much time and energy trying to adjust to the new environment. That would tend to make them both more dependent on the tyrant and less of a problem, as they devoted energy to rationalizing their new homeland.

The last four hundred years in Europe and in their developing overseas arms (colonies) witnessed the decline of monarchs. There the idea developed that sovereignty resided in the people of the nation. This latter idea was most naturally and wholesomely expressed in the Republican form of government. The view that "kings" as a carnal extrapolation of the people and symbol thereof began to decline in favor of legislative bodies.

In regard to legislative bodies the ideal of noble-minded individuals meeting for purposes of lofty debates on the best course for the "ship of state" was soon exposed. Increasingly, legislatures became seen as sites where venal men took bribes from private interests or simply "ripped off" the public purse. Naturally, the Republican form of government became hostage to the plutocratic forces in the nation - and beyond.

Legislators continued to use the idioms of accepted, noble thought, but they were mere shells. Corruption has certain visible signs. The increase of national debt was one. The constant involvement in distant wars was another. The sheer length and density of legislature was another.

In regard to involvement in distant wars, this must be viewed in context. However, there could hardly be justification on a national basis for a string of such wars. In these the signature of the "merchants of death" should be apparent. They have the influence with "patriotic" politicians, with powerful sections of the military, and even with sections of organized labor. They also work hand-in-glove with the great banking interests, which are, today, international institutions not necessarily loyal to the nation in which they began.

As plutocratic power grew in America and Europe, its agents in secret societies infiltrated all major sectors of the nation's spiritual and material infrastructure to set up the mechanisms for imploding them. A New World Order required a new set of supporting structures; ones that secured the rule of the rich and their ideological "break-legs." The latter, assisted by communist hoodlums and/or civil protestors, provided the "law" to create order out of the chaos that they caused to occur in the first place.

The basic means whereby Western nations have been defeated by underlings yearning to be rich and powerful was provided by Mr. Charles Dickens in his novel DAVID COPPERFIELD. In the episode involving the vile Uriah Heep, the British and the world were warned prophetically of their danger. The high became low, and the low became high. Dickens' message was totally missed.