Now, this is supposition, but it is also almost certainly true. One can look at any recent U.S. president and note the many Jewish advisers, cabinet officials, and high-office appointees. They are not there for love of the Jews necessarily; love for and fear of money would be more like it. Billy Jeff Clinton appointed more than 50% of the high-office vacancies to Jews. Jews provide the Democrat Party with over 50% of the donated money it receives.
Why would Jews care about a blog written by a little bitty American? They deeply resent any criticism. That fact may be missed by those accustomed to a "horse-laugh-it-off" approach. There happens to be no category of people on Earth who employ the word "hate" as much as the Jews. This should not be assumed an indication of righteousness on the part of Jews. Frequently it is aimed at individuals.
I have to admit to have studied Jews a bit. I have read what they have said about themselves and others. I have read what others have said about them.
Although most American know very little about Jews, assuming them to a range from Biblical characters to stand-up comedians, they rarely venture any real criticism. The vast majority either follow the late Rev. Jerry Falwell approach of saying no ill about Jews (fear of violating the Abrahamic covenant!!!) or the Rev. John Hagee approach of prolix praise.
As the actor Mickey Rooney once observed, "when you let other people take care of your business, you're out of business." Basically, that is the story of the decline of America. The "sons of the pioneers" handed the government over to "advisers."
Naturally, given the chance to seize power, the advisers did just that. Having gained power, they began to set up mechanisms to protect themselves, even as they also grasped for more power.
Propaganda by means of the media, entertainment, and educational tools, such as textbooks, teachers, principals, etc, helped create a "good press," while directing American minds at targets they should despise. These targets were typically enemies (aka, opponents) who were guilty of "hate," and other modern social disabilities. The opponents of the "advisers" never merely oppose; they always "hate."
As the Reverends Falwell and Hagee could have told you, "that's not love." "Love" of course is what "it's all about."
A blogger such as I who criticizes Jewry goes on Jewish "enemies lists." Organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ("ADL") and the Southern Poverty Law Center keep an eye out for such enemies, making lists thereof, and informing the various fedcops and media. Then, Homeland Security announces it has uncovered data on growing numbers of "people who hate" and have put them on its "domestic terrorist watch list." That is how a blogger such as I can be "watched" without warrant or specific warning. Such observers would not interfere with Jewish "cyber-protection leagues."
Such organizations always defend their dirty deeds by allusion to their bogus "holocaust."
I recently received a mailing from American Free Press ("AFP") requesting donated help, after a near fatal attack on their website (americanfreepress.net). Since this small media outlet is an America First citadel in a land of New World Order robonews outlets, zionist and Israel First interests do not wish it well. The attack on the American Free Press website can be compared to the attack on the US Liberty, the American intelligence ship attacked in 1967 by the IDF. It was devastating but the enemy did not prevail, due to the courageous defense offered by the Americans.
In the letter from AFP there was an allusion to the attack launched against Pat Buchanan's website. The implication was that websites that criticize Jewry or Israel tend to be targets for "hate-crime hackers."
I can only state a sense that this implication is correct. Buchanan has denounced anti-Semitism, as has AFP. I don't, since the term is used consistently by Jewish organizations, as well as noteworthy individuals, in the sense of opponent.
Opposition to a Jewish proposition is usually characterized as "hate." Europe has several academic types in jail, and heavily fined as well, for printing or orating views harmful to the "holocaust" assertion. Jewish interests have made the facts "irrelevant," since these people were accused of causing a race or religion to suffer embarrassment and disrespect before the world community. Hence, although what these jailed men said were factual evidence, which were not defeatable by Jewish "intellectuals," they were guilty anyway. As one German judge pointedly noted, "the truth of the statement is irrelevant."
That sort of thing was the reason that George Orwell wrote his novels of political warning. He had encountered that sort of thinking amongst the revolutionary socialists with whom he had shared a period of solidarity prior to his disaffection.
Today, America has Senator Joseph Lieberman and others trying to curtail the irresponsible freedom of the Internet. Media such as The Washington Post are acceptable voices on the Internet, but American Free Press is not. However, bloggers, such as I, are thought to be the real problem.
I blog under several names on different web hosts. I don't strive for material omission as a characteristic of my blogs. However, since few feel compelled to "cover" the most powerful and unruly element in the world, I give it a go.
That is reason enough for the "advisers" to proceed against me. J'accuse!
After the Inslaw software Promis was developed by the Willams, contracted for by the Department of Justice, and the uncontracted for "improved Promis" software stolen during the Ed Meese tenure as Attorney General, it was only a matter of time before it was "tweaked" to provide a spying "backdoor" to virtually any computer.
Since the fedcops have already begun citing their "fears" to their favorite media-mouths of "domestic terror" and "homegrown terror," Internet cyber-spying and "dirty tricks" are now assured as a federal government clandestine policy. Attacks by drone cyber-missiles launched from a plethora of websites is certain.
Interestingly, the fedcops are capable of using "false-flag" websites whereby to mislead the American public regarding the actual origins of the attack. Today, radical Muslim organizations will probably be accused. The probably dead Osama bin Laden has already been magnified to the size of Dr. Manhattan.
However, a real opponent might be the Peoples Republic of China, whose long-time cozy relationship with Jews and Israel have made it the beneficiary of all high-tech American developments the Israelis could steal either directly or through zionists. This state of affairs goes back at least to the '80s, as the old Liberty Lobby tabloid, The Spotlight, featured articles on this dangerous state of affairs. (Incidentally, The Spotlight was attacked relentlessly in the courts by the ADL, by "holocaust" propagandists, and by agents of the C.I.A., such as the late Howard Hunt, and eventually put out of business. Morale: Deep pockets prevail at law.)
Hence, the preparations and precedents have been set to annihilate opposition, while completely flimflamming Americans in regard to the real purpose. The attack on my computer is merely a "drop in the cyber-bucket" at what lies ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment