TIME TO RESIGN



As a citizen of the United States of America, I believe that I would  have abandoned my country to the nomads and desperadoes if I did not call upon the sitting President of the United States, Barack Obama, to immediately resign. If the President is fearful of remaining in the United States as a resigned leader, arrangements could be made to lodge him and his family safely in the City of London or in the Israeli state.

The world community would also welcome his immediate retirement, as his failures are manifest and contagious. The world community demands his prompt departure. All over this good Earth cries from responsible world leaders deafens with their indignation.


Mr. President Obama has wounded his people with his brutal policies that boost the wealth of great banks and international corporations by billions of dollars, while at the same time abandoning 16-18 million Americans to joblessness. Mr. President Obama has waged a perverted “War on Poverty” by intentionally hurting the poor of this country with his cruel policies.


Mr. President Obama has sought to increase American homelessness to enrich the great banking and mortgage industries with foreclosures, making these villainous companies America’s new homeowners.


Mr. President Obama has overseen a hastening flight of American industries to foreign shores, while extolling “free trade” and the re-education of American workers. How they will pay for it he confides with coughs and slurred words. From time to time Mr. Obama boasts of new job creation, as he notes services jobs at the lowest possible wages have increased somewhat. He wonders if immigration should be increased to meet the needs of busy wives unable to clean their homes or care for their children, as they work two or three service jobs.


Mr. President Obama has appointed a high official of General Electric to advise him on jobs, while GE announces it will shut down it x-ray plant and move it to China.


Mr. President Obama’s former preacher used to close a church meeting by shouting “Goddamn America.” Mr. Obama has topped him by saying “Goddamn America” with his deeds.


Notwithstanding all the other cruel deeds Mr. Obama has perpetrated during his brutal two years in office, he has not been satisfied with his record. He has given the “green light” to the use of remote torture against citizens of the United States guilty of the New Obama Administration Crime, expressing one’s point of view in public.


Caveat: Mr. Obama belongs to a social clique that believes that the people cannot be trusted with anything approaching the full truth. Naturally, they cannot sit idly by while citizens inform one another.


Mr. President Obama has unleashed his torturers on me, using the tried and true means developed by DARPA and the CIA to employ microwave devices, acoustic devices and similar high-tech methods. His has done this to untold numbers of Americans. Due to the isolated nature of the techniques and the cruel natures of those that employ them, they are certain to become widely used. Even now, police use some of the technologies developed.


In my case the attacks have been daily. I work during the day, and at such time – probably because I’m driving or entering tall buildings – I tend to be little affected. At my unit at a retirement facility, which unit I’m glad to have, I have three choices of seats. In every one I come under attack by some unknown pulsing force. Whatever it is, it can be calibrated to increase or decrease in force and it can be easily redirected to another location, if I move.


At the beginning in February, 2011, the calibration was not as well established as it is now. I believe that this force can be directed to my personal – and probably unique – electromagnetic field. Hence, as time goes by, I would guess that it can follow me wherever I go. In a way it is an extension of spying, having the additional capacity to inflict torture as an ever-present option. Given the “track records” of the CIA and the DoD, the torture option is not likely to be a rarely used option.


The areas of my body that are prime targets are my hip joints, tailbone, and lower back. In these areas, assuming I remain seated long, a boring pulse will continue until clear discomfort results in my changing position. Yet, changing position constantly is itself unnatural. It is difficult to work at any project or read any book while constantly changing position. Therefore, I endure these assaults from the “black ops” that are undoubtedly behind this torture.


This willingness to endure the torture of President Obama’s confederates may well result in permanent injury to one or both hips. It is also possible that injury to the spine is the desired result sought by these villains. Clearly, my being unable to work and get around – perhaps bedridden- would limit my effectiveness to express myself.


Further, since the soft tissue near these skeletal elements are also sustaining the same assaults, injury to glands such as kidneys and liver are possible. Cancer-engendering may be an experimental element to these “Dr. Mengeles’ ” scientific work.


Since the key element of remote torture is the anonymity of the perpetrators, it is a situation that can – and must – be reported by its victims. Since the level used against me may involve orbiting “spy satellites” and other expensive equipment, it isn’t very likely at all that anyone not within government or closely connected to it is involved. My view is that its members comprise what is sometimes called a “stalking team” and is multijurisdictional in nature.


Incidentally, why do I think that President Obama or high officials of his administration are involved with my torture? Frankly, it may have been spawned during the Billy Jeff Clinton administration, or before. However, it had definitely gotten in to gear by the George W. Bush administration. The reason may have been my putting too much information on public access television, or my irritating them with the word images I utilized. One cannot underestimate the pettiness of a politician. Lastly, it may have begun by a chance decision to make me a guinea pig in an intelligence experiment that was designed to test behavior under duress.


On the other hand I have scrutinized Jewry, its religio-culture and history, in an unprecedented way on television. That isn’t something that Jews generally welcome. Revenge and stifling are as characteristic of Jewish behavior as breathing is in other forms of life. Since Jews have sought and obtained such power in America that few dare look them in eye, it isn’t inconceivable that they are behind the snowballing efforts at torturing me. They have attempted defamation of me without satisfactory results. Now, they may have decided to “roll up their sleeves” and get into their beloved cruelties.


If this surmise is true, then they could not have found a more compliant president to work with than Mr. Obama. His key supporters and advisers have been, and are, Jews, including well-known terrorists. There are no Democrats and no Republicans who would dare deny Jews the torture option. They would all agree that in my case, it is justified, even if – in principle – they object to torture. Besides, anonymous, unprovable torture has its own beauty in the world of crime and punishment. It is only news if it can be proved.


Since the likelihood of the stalking team being a multijurisdictional group exists, I can only speculate on the specific combination. My view is that it is composed of fedcop components, whether they are FBI/ATF/Homeland Security or CIA or other. Some element of state or local police should be present, or allowed to receive reports and tapes. Probably much of the “grind work” would be given to members of secular spying outfits, such as the ADL of B’nai B’rith or the Southern Poverty Law Center. Regardless of which participated of these latter two, one would put together a team of Jews, “gays” and blacks to “work the devices.” This work would be a “labor of perverse love.


Since the ADL has been charged to be an unregistered agent of the foreign country, Israel (sic), it can be assumed that they have ready access to many of the Israeli devices of remote torture. Since the Israeli’s have the knack – thanks to their extensive “buddy system” within the DoD – of learning about the very latest U.S. weapons, their obtaining any of DARPA’s most diabolical weapons must be considered a high probability. Israelis are famous for “tweaking” U.S. weapons to fit their needs, and terror and torture always fit that description. Therefore, the ADL might have been able to provide their stalking team even more effective devices than the DoD or CIA could.


Nor is the stalking of older men an unknown procedure to the Jews. They are still stalking any World War 2 era citizen of Germany and allied nations, hoping to find a crime they can charge them with. Why? They are desperate to shore up their Shoah business. They are the primary force behind the stalking of men charged with civil rights violations and the repeated trials of individuals until guilty verdicts are arrived at by juries. Those charged tended to be 75 year old men, or older. The evidence tends to be circumstantial, and the charges typically denied by the accused. Witnesses against the accused tend to be “FBI informants.” Parenthetically, J. Edgar Hoover invented the word “informant” because he didn’t like the public relations involved with the use of formerly used “fink” and “rat.”


The concept “Innocent until proven guilty” is strange to Jews. They prefer “Guilty through interpretive analysis.” There are no judges in America who will “buck” the Jewish formula.


With President Obama a fellow traveler with Jews and living amid their tents, the world community had no choice but to demand the end of his cruel rule. They call forth to him: Mr. President, step down! Let the sun shine right into America. Stop terrorizing and torturing your own fellow citizens (assuming you are, indeed, a citizen) and join the righteous of the world.


Mr. President Obama, don’t eat your citizens, love them. There can be no greater love than this: that a bad president gives up his administration for the world good.


Incidentally, those interested in remote torture can check out www.surveillanceissues.com for starters. 

THE NEVER-ENDING OPPRESSION

There don’t seem to be many authoritative voices that can be easily tapped on the Internet search services in regard to nations that have had to pay the longest periods of reparations after losing a war, but I doubt that any have had to pay as much and as long as Germany has. Although German leaders may have agreed to it and have shouldered the burden of guilt for “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity,” there is no excuse any longer for this basically coerced payment to continue.

The primary lesson to be drawn from the Nuremberg Trials is that the victorious side can put to death high-ranking political officials and military officers for acts that may have equaled the atrocities committed by the victorious side. These Trials may have also legitimized the enslavement of the German people to the Jewish people to whom they are paying tribute even today, as well as tribute to the Israeli nation.

Let me be blunt: the holocaust of the Jews is a fraud. Few people realize that the Jewish side of the proposition that six million Jews were gassed by the Nazis is overwhelmingly anecdotal, while those that have questioned this proposition have focused on the measurable facts, such as alleged procedures for sending groups of Jews into the chambers, the chambers themselves, the type of gas allegedly used, the venting process, the removal of the dead, the disposal of the dead, the cremation facilities, the cremation process, the time involved in cremations, the requirement to halt for maintenance, the nature of the chimneys, and other areas of the proposition that can be scientifically tested or mathematically calculated through standard engineering techniques.

Basically, the issue comes down to the acquired power of Jews to compel other people to accept the preposterous as factual and true. Certainly, claims by hordes of Jews with vested interests about losing five aunts and uncles, a granny, a husband/wife, and 2.3 children cannot overcome arguments based on known scientific facts and mathematics. Therefore, something other than the facts of the case must be understood as prevailing in the decision-making process.

This is not to say that a low percentage of Jews incarcerated in Nazi concentration camps may not have been murdered. Those wrongly murdered may have been murdered by Nazis, by other non-Jewish inmates, or by Jewish inmates. However, the issue here is the claim that six million Jews were murdered. One holocaust-friendly French historian calculated that about 775,000 Jews were murdered. That is a huge variation from the figure Jews have successfully claimed in American media and schools. The most reasonable calculation is that less than 300,000 Jews died from all causes - natural and unnatural - in the Nazi concentration camps.

There are Holocaust Museums everywhere, and they have been typically financed with other people’s money. I believe that the United States citizenry underwrite $50 million per year. American officials may not be able to find money to repair a bridge, but they always find money for this pet Jewish project (and most any other).

The fact that Jewry appears to be a criminal syndicate and acts like one may provide insight into why politicians, leading professionals and businessmen seem to always rush to provide them needed services. The worldwide usury racket of the Jews requires a certain amount of brute force to insure compliance. The U.S. military and N.A.T.O. are premier examples of the ready force that Jewry can engineer into its long-range projects.

The “all-seeing eye” of Jewry rarely misses opposition – even seemingly insignificant bloggers. The application of “break-leg” and “dirty-tricks” techniques are assigned to one of the numerous secular Jewish spying organizations, and such nefarious activity may be done in conjunction with fedcops. Encountering these people make you appreciate Jewish historian Hannah Arendt’s comment about the “banality of evil.” Indeed, it is as close and as common as the nearest Jewish school, where young Abe Reles and Tick Tock Tannenbaums have their natural malevolence groomed and aimed in what seems to Jewry as a positive role, spying on non-Jews.

What has Jewry done with all the tribute paid by Germany since the end of World War II? Well, assuming that Germany paid the Jews and Israel (sic) in German Marks, the best guess is that most of it was spent on needed products useful to a new nation and in investing in German property. Jewry always had a strong banking presence in Germany. Based on investment patterns in Great Britain and the U.S.A., one would suppose Jews invested in media, real estate, drugs and possibly cyber-associated businesses. One does know that German marks are not the currency of record in the Israeli state. While some may have been stockpiled for future use or for currency swaps, I believe that much of it went back into Germany as investments. Of course, ownership usually suggests control.

Many people don’t realize that no peace treaty was ever concluded with Germany, that it operates under a constitution known as the Basic Law which was imposed on it by the Allies, and that Germany is technically an occupied country.

Not surprisingly, the children of Germany have been indoctrinated in the Jewish deceit known as the Holocaust and mostly accept guilt for it. This crime against the human mind has never been arrested. This moral outrage has not brought forth a peep of concern from either the Roman Catholic Church or by most Protestant leaders. They are part of the problem.

Parenthetically, The Washington Post reported on its front page several years back that over 100,000 Jews had migrated to Germany. This paper seemed to find the data “good news.” Since the spanking new Jewish nation in the Levant welcomed Jews, one wonders why they preferred Germany. One motivation may have been to better oversee Jewish investments (you can’t really trust non-Jews, doncha know?).

Incidentally, the decline of Swiss Bank secrecy may be a result of the lack of need by Jews, due to the bustling banking business in Israel (sic). Don’t imagine for a moment that U.S. politicians would put the sort of pressure on the Jewish state that has been put on Switzerland anent bank secrecy. Even if they tried, Israeli officials would have none of it. Jews can defeat almost any American politician through media hostility and financing of opponent(s).

There are other people who have made claims for reparations that involved long periods of time. Only the Germans have paid for over sixty years to one alleged victim – the Jews. Although Israel wasn’t even a state when World War II occurred, it has also been a beneficiary of reparation payments.

Because Jewry behaves more like a criminal syndicate than a nation, it does not seem capable of ending the tribute payment itself. Although the preposterous claim of six million Jews gassed by the Nazis may – in the eyes of Jewry – constitute a wrong that cannot be made whole, its fictional nature reduces Jewish claims to a criminal scam.

Nevertheless, the ending of its demand for reparation from Germany for injuries suffered by Jewry during the Nazi period would constitute the single indication that Israel (sic) and world Jewry have matured into a respectable people. Until this oppression ends there is no reason to view Israel (sic) or Jewry as other than a variety of pirate.

ADOLPH'S DEAD

On Friday, the eighth of July, 2011 I happened to be delivering an item to an individual who was scheduled to stay at the Hilton Hotel in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia. I stopped at the registration counter to present it. First order of business was to check and verify that that individual was scheduled to stay at the hotel. Since she was not registered under the name I had been given, the clerk began a more thorough search. I waited.

Meanwhile, a man approached the counter next to my location. Another registration counter clerk greeted him. "What is your name?" she inquired.

He responded "Hitler." (My phonetic rendering of the name was "Hitler.")

I of course heard all this but paid no apparent interest.

The clerk who had greeted this man fell into a very awkward, meaningful pause. I could not help but feel embarrassment for this man - but also for this American woman's inadequacies.

Finally, she stammered, "German?"

He replied, "Austrian."

By this point the woman was regaining her composure a bit and proceeded along a relatively stable course of confirming and checking in the man known as "Hitler."

My own business was by now successfully concluded, and I left.

I never looked at "Hitler." I knew that he was already made to feel awkward by the clerk and I had no desire to contribute to this embarrassing situation.

My analysis of this situation is that both the clerk and "Hitler" were victims of the supremely obtuse approach of American educators and entertainers to the German Adolph Hitler of the 1930-1945 period of history. Since the great American media attempt to blend these two categories, it too reflects this historical dis-service of fearfully misrepresenting the man, Adolph Hitler, as a devil mixed up with monster.

With vast numbers of American children dragged off to "Holocaust Museums" for indoctrination, the injury to minds starts very early. The "mother-of-all-holocaust-museums" located in Washington, D.C. just off the Mall is barely distinguishable from a Halloween "haunted house," according to the emotions its displays are intended to engender.

"The horror! The horror!" moaned the Marlon Brando character in APOCALYPSE NOW.

Children in America are trained from childhood to think of Adolph Hitler as the most horrible demon the world has ever seen.

In fact Adolph Hitler was a visionary who loved Germany and thought that Germany should be "of, by and for the Germans" (quoting me). Being a visionary does not mean that one's vision is a correct one, or good one, or even desirable one in part or whole. Adolph Hitler was not the first nor the last example of the ethnocentric mind operating on the world stage.

What Adolph Hitler represented was either a barrier to world government (controlled by others) or a competing, unacceptable approach to world government. A clue to this may be found in the approach to national revenue/expenditure by Adolph Hitler in the 1933-1940 period.

The Holocaust asserted by the Jews is mostly anecdotal and contradictory, after the Edomite Jewish witnesses against Christ. The material facts relative to the assertions of the Jews have been shown to contradict the holocaust assertions. Result? Many of the brave academic specialists presenting the contradicting arguments in various aspects of the case have been thrown in jail on charges that boil down to "hurting the feelings of the Jews." As one German judge asserted, "The truth of the material presented is irrelevant."

This may be viewed as a bit of a digression by a reader, but my thrust is that the programs of Hitler were rational approaches that appeared to work to varying degrees. He was not a demon. However, it was useful to others who are also seeking a New World Order that his approach never be tried again. By making Hitler a "demon" his enemies (or users) can also make his approach "the road to hell." Who would voluntarily want to go there?

Therefore, when the registration counter clerk at the Hilton Hotel heard the name "Hitler," she was paralyzed by "the horror." Had the man said "Baron von Frankenstein," she would not have blinked an eye. In fact she would have been pleased that a "noble" planned to stay at her hotel. However, some twenty years of her life had absorbed enough horror indoctrination in regard to Adolph Hitler that her Pavlovian Response was inevitable. Alas, there are hordes of Americans that reflect the same crippled state of mind as she did.

MANCHURIAN CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS

I've noticed from a number of prominent "Christian Zionists" a very similar manner of expressing why they hold the views that they espouse. John Hagee, the noted media preacher, has described a unique experience upon entering the present Israeli state, which appeared to be life-changing.



I recently heard almost a word-for-word recapitulation of Hagee's experience by Michele Bachmann, as she described her transformation.

I believe that Sarah Palin also spoke in transformational terms in regard to experiencing the Israeli state. One wonders if Israeli intelligence might be working a kosher MK-ULTRA program, as they experiment on how to co-op Protestants into litter-carrying servants.

The whole Tea Party Movement appears to be led by Protestants of this sort. They have all gone to Jerusalem to seek anointing from the Israeli leadership.

In the old days of America there were "America Firsters." The Tea Party crowd has introduced the modern "Israel Firsters." Nuking Iran is high on their agenda.



Sarah Palin was reported by one small news outlet to have worn on her lapel while governor of Alaska (and possibly prior to that) an Israeli national flag. One can be excused if s/he gets the crazy idea and wonders outloud if Palin and Bachmann might not be partially derived from "wandering Jews." Their attractiveness to Senators McCain and Lieberman certainly is not founded on their wearing American flag lapel pins.

After graduating from high school, Michele Bachmann felt the urge to go to live and work in a kibbutz in the Israeli state. Whether she gunned down any Palestinians is not known to me, but I don't think that that would have been a problem for her. It would be an unusual choice for a non-Jew, as such youth could have travelled to Cuba and cut sugar cane for Fidel, experiencing the communal life closer to home. Who knows? They might get to meet Ted Turner there.

The Protestantism generally associated with this sort of religious fervor is Dispensationism wedded to bizarre veneration of Jews based on unfounded interpretations of the Abrahamic covenant. Oddly, this group of "Christians" freely denounces "religious extremists."

I recall seeing a video presentation from a priest named John O'Connor, who stated that he could not wait to get out of the Israeli state because "everyone has guns."

It seemed that Isaac's son, Esau, was a hunter, and his seed has kept up the family tradition.

MURDER IN BETHESDA

The police have been diligently investigating this recent murder at the Lululemon retail shop. According to radio accounts, police suspect that the crime was opportunistic, involving two men who were prepared to rob something or someone. They may have had one or two targets in mind as possibilities. Then, apparently, they saw two young women enter a darkened or dimmed shop and quickly followed them into it.

Once inside the shop, things got violent. One woman was sexually assaulted and murdered by blunt force. The other woman was sexually assaulted, battered (apparently), and tied up. Whether these two men actually stole anything was not clear from the police reports mentioned over the radio.

Is this not passing strange for a crime scenario?

Firstly, according to the report over the radio, the two men wore masks and gloves. They appeared to have prepared for a theft or robbery event. Preparation and some level of experience in these sorts of crime may be inferred. However, attacking the women seemed to be the primary event. This was not consistent with a robbery preparation. This was especially so due to the prominent location, the level of people walking and driving about Friday night in the 9 pm - 12 am time slot. An Apple Store was next door and had attracted a large crowd to view the new ipad.

Given the objective scenario at the time, a quick robbery would appear to be called for. Else, the women would be secured in the backroom somewhere until human traffic outside had become scarce. Then the robbers would scram with their loot. So what happened?

There was a possibility that Jayna Murray exposed the face of one of the men, resulting in an "eliminate the witness" scenario. If so, why was not the other woman killed for the same reason. It was possible that the two women had been taken to different areas of the store where visual contact was not possible. The reason for the latter event may have been twin rapes. One woman fought, exposing the face of her attacker, and the other did not fight.

However, the rape scenario doesn't seem valid under the circumstances, assuming two men prepared with masks and gloves entered an upscale shop. The risk-reward benefit doesn't favor rape as a primary mission.

What if murder was their primary mission? What if Jayna Murray had been the target all along? What if the other woman had a grudge against Ms. Murray? What if she arranged with the two "masked men" to meet her as she was rendezvousing with Ms. Murray. She had called Ms. Murray at her home to explain that she had left something inside the shop that she needed to retrieve. When Ms. Murray agreed, the other woman could have contacted the two men that the "hit was on."

There is the possibility that one of the two men had a personal relationship with the other woman. The alleged rape of this woman may have been by a regular sex-partner. On the alternate side if she had a third-party boyfriend who knew some men who might do the "hit," he may have called them after his girlfriend called to say that Ms. Murray had agreed to return.

Additionally, if Ms. Murray knew the other woman's boyfriend, however remotely, she might have recognized him, either by ripping away his mask or by guessing his voice. Then the witness was eliminated.

Usually, in an "eliminate the witness" scenario one would expect that both women would have been killed. They can't hang you twice. The two men did not appear to be pressured to "hurry up."

There may be some new revelation soon by the police. For the moment there seem to be valid reasons to be suspicious of the other woman's role in this despicable crime.