THE NEVER-ENDING OPPRESSION

There don’t seem to be many authoritative voices that can be easily tapped on the Internet search services in regard to nations that have had to pay the longest periods of reparations after losing a war, but I doubt that any have had to pay as much and as long as Germany has. Although German leaders may have agreed to it and have shouldered the burden of guilt for “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity,” there is no excuse any longer for this basically coerced payment to continue.

The primary lesson to be drawn from the Nuremberg Trials is that the victorious side can put to death high-ranking political officials and military officers for acts that may have equaled the atrocities committed by the victorious side. These Trials may have also legitimized the enslavement of the German people to the Jewish people to whom they are paying tribute even today, as well as tribute to the Israeli nation.

Let me be blunt: the holocaust of the Jews is a fraud. Few people realize that the Jewish side of the proposition that six million Jews were gassed by the Nazis is overwhelmingly anecdotal, while those that have questioned this proposition have focused on the measurable facts, such as alleged procedures for sending groups of Jews into the chambers, the chambers themselves, the type of gas allegedly used, the venting process, the removal of the dead, the disposal of the dead, the cremation facilities, the cremation process, the time involved in cremations, the requirement to halt for maintenance, the nature of the chimneys, and other areas of the proposition that can be scientifically tested or mathematically calculated through standard engineering techniques.

Basically, the issue comes down to the acquired power of Jews to compel other people to accept the preposterous as factual and true. Certainly, claims by hordes of Jews with vested interests about losing five aunts and uncles, a granny, a husband/wife, and 2.3 children cannot overcome arguments based on known scientific facts and mathematics. Therefore, something other than the facts of the case must be understood as prevailing in the decision-making process.

This is not to say that a low percentage of Jews incarcerated in Nazi concentration camps may not have been murdered. Those wrongly murdered may have been murdered by Nazis, by other non-Jewish inmates, or by Jewish inmates. However, the issue here is the claim that six million Jews were murdered. One holocaust-friendly French historian calculated that about 775,000 Jews were murdered. That is a huge variation from the figure Jews have successfully claimed in American media and schools. The most reasonable calculation is that less than 300,000 Jews died from all causes - natural and unnatural - in the Nazi concentration camps.

There are Holocaust Museums everywhere, and they have been typically financed with other people’s money. I believe that the United States citizenry underwrite $50 million per year. American officials may not be able to find money to repair a bridge, but they always find money for this pet Jewish project (and most any other).

The fact that Jewry appears to be a criminal syndicate and acts like one may provide insight into why politicians, leading professionals and businessmen seem to always rush to provide them needed services. The worldwide usury racket of the Jews requires a certain amount of brute force to insure compliance. The U.S. military and N.A.T.O. are premier examples of the ready force that Jewry can engineer into its long-range projects.

The “all-seeing eye” of Jewry rarely misses opposition – even seemingly insignificant bloggers. The application of “break-leg” and “dirty-tricks” techniques are assigned to one of the numerous secular Jewish spying organizations, and such nefarious activity may be done in conjunction with fedcops. Encountering these people make you appreciate Jewish historian Hannah Arendt’s comment about the “banality of evil.” Indeed, it is as close and as common as the nearest Jewish school, where young Abe Reles and Tick Tock Tannenbaums have their natural malevolence groomed and aimed in what seems to Jewry as a positive role, spying on non-Jews.

What has Jewry done with all the tribute paid by Germany since the end of World War II? Well, assuming that Germany paid the Jews and Israel (sic) in German Marks, the best guess is that most of it was spent on needed products useful to a new nation and in investing in German property. Jewry always had a strong banking presence in Germany. Based on investment patterns in Great Britain and the U.S.A., one would suppose Jews invested in media, real estate, drugs and possibly cyber-associated businesses. One does know that German marks are not the currency of record in the Israeli state. While some may have been stockpiled for future use or for currency swaps, I believe that much of it went back into Germany as investments. Of course, ownership usually suggests control.

Many people don’t realize that no peace treaty was ever concluded with Germany, that it operates under a constitution known as the Basic Law which was imposed on it by the Allies, and that Germany is technically an occupied country.

Not surprisingly, the children of Germany have been indoctrinated in the Jewish deceit known as the Holocaust and mostly accept guilt for it. This crime against the human mind has never been arrested. This moral outrage has not brought forth a peep of concern from either the Roman Catholic Church or by most Protestant leaders. They are part of the problem.

Parenthetically, The Washington Post reported on its front page several years back that over 100,000 Jews had migrated to Germany. This paper seemed to find the data “good news.” Since the spanking new Jewish nation in the Levant welcomed Jews, one wonders why they preferred Germany. One motivation may have been to better oversee Jewish investments (you can’t really trust non-Jews, doncha know?).

Incidentally, the decline of Swiss Bank secrecy may be a result of the lack of need by Jews, due to the bustling banking business in Israel (sic). Don’t imagine for a moment that U.S. politicians would put the sort of pressure on the Jewish state that has been put on Switzerland anent bank secrecy. Even if they tried, Israeli officials would have none of it. Jews can defeat almost any American politician through media hostility and financing of opponent(s).

There are other people who have made claims for reparations that involved long periods of time. Only the Germans have paid for over sixty years to one alleged victim – the Jews. Although Israel wasn’t even a state when World War II occurred, it has also been a beneficiary of reparation payments.

Because Jewry behaves more like a criminal syndicate than a nation, it does not seem capable of ending the tribute payment itself. Although the preposterous claim of six million Jews gassed by the Nazis may – in the eyes of Jewry – constitute a wrong that cannot be made whole, its fictional nature reduces Jewish claims to a criminal scam.

Nevertheless, the ending of its demand for reparation from Germany for injuries suffered by Jewry during the Nazi period would constitute the single indication that Israel (sic) and world Jewry have matured into a respectable people. Until this oppression ends there is no reason to view Israel (sic) or Jewry as other than a variety of pirate.

ADOLPH'S DEAD

On Friday, the eighth of July, 2011 I happened to be delivering an item to an individual who was scheduled to stay at the Hilton Hotel in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia. I stopped at the registration counter to present it. First order of business was to check and verify that that individual was scheduled to stay at the hotel. Since she was not registered under the name I had been given, the clerk began a more thorough search. I waited.

Meanwhile, a man approached the counter next to my location. Another registration counter clerk greeted him. "What is your name?" she inquired.

He responded "Hitler." (My phonetic rendering of the name was "Hitler.")

I of course heard all this but paid no apparent interest.

The clerk who had greeted this man fell into a very awkward, meaningful pause. I could not help but feel embarrassment for this man - but also for this American woman's inadequacies.

Finally, she stammered, "German?"

He replied, "Austrian."

By this point the woman was regaining her composure a bit and proceeded along a relatively stable course of confirming and checking in the man known as "Hitler."

My own business was by now successfully concluded, and I left.

I never looked at "Hitler." I knew that he was already made to feel awkward by the clerk and I had no desire to contribute to this embarrassing situation.

My analysis of this situation is that both the clerk and "Hitler" were victims of the supremely obtuse approach of American educators and entertainers to the German Adolph Hitler of the 1930-1945 period of history. Since the great American media attempt to blend these two categories, it too reflects this historical dis-service of fearfully misrepresenting the man, Adolph Hitler, as a devil mixed up with monster.

With vast numbers of American children dragged off to "Holocaust Museums" for indoctrination, the injury to minds starts very early. The "mother-of-all-holocaust-museums" located in Washington, D.C. just off the Mall is barely distinguishable from a Halloween "haunted house," according to the emotions its displays are intended to engender.

"The horror! The horror!" moaned the Marlon Brando character in APOCALYPSE NOW.

Children in America are trained from childhood to think of Adolph Hitler as the most horrible demon the world has ever seen.

In fact Adolph Hitler was a visionary who loved Germany and thought that Germany should be "of, by and for the Germans" (quoting me). Being a visionary does not mean that one's vision is a correct one, or good one, or even desirable one in part or whole. Adolph Hitler was not the first nor the last example of the ethnocentric mind operating on the world stage.

What Adolph Hitler represented was either a barrier to world government (controlled by others) or a competing, unacceptable approach to world government. A clue to this may be found in the approach to national revenue/expenditure by Adolph Hitler in the 1933-1940 period.

The Holocaust asserted by the Jews is mostly anecdotal and contradictory, after the Edomite Jewish witnesses against Christ. The material facts relative to the assertions of the Jews have been shown to contradict the holocaust assertions. Result? Many of the brave academic specialists presenting the contradicting arguments in various aspects of the case have been thrown in jail on charges that boil down to "hurting the feelings of the Jews." As one German judge asserted, "The truth of the material presented is irrelevant."

This may be viewed as a bit of a digression by a reader, but my thrust is that the programs of Hitler were rational approaches that appeared to work to varying degrees. He was not a demon. However, it was useful to others who are also seeking a New World Order that his approach never be tried again. By making Hitler a "demon" his enemies (or users) can also make his approach "the road to hell." Who would voluntarily want to go there?

Therefore, when the registration counter clerk at the Hilton Hotel heard the name "Hitler," she was paralyzed by "the horror." Had the man said "Baron von Frankenstein," she would not have blinked an eye. In fact she would have been pleased that a "noble" planned to stay at her hotel. However, some twenty years of her life had absorbed enough horror indoctrination in regard to Adolph Hitler that her Pavlovian Response was inevitable. Alas, there are hordes of Americans that reflect the same crippled state of mind as she did.