Bold Sunny Blue

FRUIT OF MISDEEDS?

2012-01-02T17:36:00.000-08:00

Q. Why do Republicans drink?

A. To forget.

TIME TO RESIGN

2011-08-18T21:23:00.000-07:00

As a citizen of the United States of America, I believe that I would have abandoned my country to the nomads and desperadoes if I did not call upon the sitting President of the United States, Barack Obama, to immediately resign. If the President is fearful of remaining in the United States as a resigned leader, arrangements could be made to lodge him and his family safely in the City of London or in the Israeli state.

The world community would also welcome his immediate retirement, as his failures are manifest and contagious. The world community demands his prompt departure. All over this good Earth cries from responsible world leaders deafens with their indignation.

Mr. President Obama has wounded his people with his brutal policies that boost the wealth of great banks and international corporations by billions of dollars, while at the same time abandoning 16-18 million Americans to joblessness. Mr. President Obama has waged a perverted “War on Poverty” by intentionally hurting the poor of this country with his cruel policies.

Mr. President Obama has sought to increase American homelessness to enrich the great banking and mortgage industries with foreclosures, making these villainous companies America’s new homeowners.

Mr. President Obama has overseen a hastening flight of American industries to foreign shores, while extolling “free trade” and the re-education of American workers. How they will pay for it he confides with coughs and slurred words. From time to time Mr. Obama boasts of new job creation, as he notes services jobs at the lowest possible wages have increased somewhat. He wonders if immigration should be increased to meet the needs of busy wives unable to clean their homes or care for their children, as they work two or three service jobs.

Mr. President Obama has appointed a high official of General Electric to advise him on jobs, while GE announces it will shut down it x-ray plant and move it to China.

Mr. President Obama’s former preacher used to close a church meeting by shouting “Goddamn America.” Mr. Obama has topped him by saying “Goddamn America” with his deeds.

Notwithstanding all the other cruel deeds Mr. Obama has perpetrated during his brutal two years in office, he has not been satisfied with his record. He has given the “green light” to the use of remote torture against citizens of the United States guilty of the New Obama Administration Crime, expressing one’s point of view in public.

Caveat: Mr. Obama belongs to a social clique that believes that the people cannot be trusted with anything approaching the full truth. Naturally, they cannot sit idly by while citizens inform one another.

Mr. President Obama has unleashed his torturers on me, using the tried and true means developed by DARPA and the CIA to employ microwave devices, acoustic devices and similar high-tech methods. His has done this to untold numbers of Americans. Due to the isolated nature of the techniques and the cruel natures of those that employ them, they are certain to become widely used. Even now, police use some of the technologies developed.

In my case the attacks have been daily. I work during the day, and at such time – probably because I’m driving or entering tall buildings – I tend to be little affected. At my unit at a retirement facility, which unit I’m glad to have, I have three choices of seats. In every one I come under attack by some unknown pulsing force. Whatever it is, it can be calibrated to increase or decrease in force and it can be easily redirected to another location, if I move.

At the beginning in February, 2011, the calibration was not as well established as it is now. I believe that this force can be directed to my personal – and probably unique – electromagnetic field. Hence, as time goes by, I would guess that it can follow me wherever I go. In a way it is an extension of spying, having the additional capacity to inflict torture as an ever-present option. Given the “track records” of the CIA and the DoD, the torture option is not likely to be a rarely used option.

The areas of my body that are prime targets are my hip joints, tailbone, and lower back. In these areas, assuming I remain seated long, a boring pulse will continue until clear discomfort results in my changing position. Yet, changing position constantly is itself unnatural. It is difficult to work at any project or read any book while constantly changing position. Therefore, I endure these assaults from the “black ops” that are undoubtedly behind this torture.

This willingness to endure the torture of President Obama’s confederates may well result in permanent injury to one or both hips. It is also possible that injury to the spine is the desired result sought by these villains. Clearly, my being unable to work and get around – perhaps bedridden- would limit my effectiveness to express myself.

Further, since the soft tissue near these skeletal elements are also sustaining the same assaults, injury to glands such as kidneys and liver are possible. Cancer-engendering may be an experimental element to these “Dr. Mengeles’ ” scientific work.

Since the key element of remote torture is the anonymity of the perpetrators, it is a situation that can – and must – be reported by its victims. Since the level used against me may involve orbiting “spy satellites” and other expensive equipment, it isn’t very likely at all that anyone not within government or closely connected to it is involved. My view is that its members comprise what is sometimes called a “stalking team” and is multijurisdictional in nature.

Incidentally, why do I think that President Obama or high officials of his administration are involved with my torture? Frankly, it may have been spawned during the Billy Jeff Clinton administration, or before. However, it had definitely gotten in to gear by the George W. Bush administration. The reason may have been my putting too much information on public access television, or my irritating them with the word images I utilized. One cannot underestimate the pettiness of a politician. Lastly, it may have begun by a chance decision to make me a guinea pig in an intelligence experiment that was designed to test behavior under duress.

On the other hand I have scrutinized Jewry, its religio-culture and history, in an unprecedented way on television. That isn’t something that Jews generally welcome. Revenge and stifling are as characteristic of Jewish behavior as breathing is in other forms of life. Since Jews have sought and obtained such power in America that few dare look them in eye, it isn’t inconceivable that they are behind the snowballing efforts at torturing me. They have attempted defamation of me without satisfactory results. Now, they may have decided to “roll up their sleeves” and get into their beloved cruelties.

If this surmise is true, then they could not have found a more compliant president to work with than Mr. Obama. His key supporters and advisers have been, and are, Jews, including well-known terrorists. There are no Democrats and no Republicans who would dare deny Jews the torture option. They would all agree that in my case, it is justified, even if – in principle – they object to torture. Besides, anonymous, unprovable torture has its own beauty in the world of crime and punishment. It is only news if it can be proved.

Since the likelihood of the stalking team being a multijurisdictional group exists, I can only speculate on the specific combination. My view is that it is composed of fedcop components, whether they are FBI/ATF/Homeland Security or CIA or other. Some element of state or local police should be present, or allowed to receive reports and tapes. Probably much of the “grind work” would be given to members of secular spying outfits, such as the ADL of B’nai B’rith or the Southern Poverty Law Center. Regardless of which participated of these latter two, one would put together a team of Jews, “gays” and blacks to “work the devices.” This work would be a “labor of perverse love.

Since the ADL has been charged to be an unregistered agent of the foreign country, Israel (sic), it can be assumed that they have ready access to many of the Israeli devices of remote torture. Since the Israeli’s have the knack – thanks to their extensive “buddy system” within the DoD – of learning about the very latest U.S. weapons, their obtaining any of DARPA’s most diabolical weapons must be considered a high probability. Israelis are famous for “tweaking” U.S. weapons to fit their needs, and terror and torture always fit that description. Therefore, the ADL might have been able to provide their stalking team even more effective devices than the DoD or CIA could.

Nor is the stalking of older men an unknown procedure to the Jews. They are still stalking any World War 2 era citizen of Germany and allied nations, hoping to find a crime they can charge them with. Why? They are desperate to shore up their Shoah business. They are the primary force behind the stalking of men charged with civil rights violations and the repeated trials of individuals until guilty verdicts are arrived at by juries. Those charged tended to be 75 year old men, or older. The evidence tends to be circumstantial, and the charges typically denied by the accused. Witnesses against the accused tend to be “FBI informants.” Parenthetically, J. Edgar Hoover invented the word “informant” because he didn’t like the public relations involved with the use of formerly used “fink” and “rat.”

The concept “Innocent until proven guilty” is strange to Jews. They prefer “Guilty through interpretive analysis.” There are no judges in America who will “buck” the Jewish formula.

With President Obama a fellow traveler with Jews and living amid their tents, the world community had no choice but to demand the end of his cruel rule. They call forth to him: Mr. President, step down! Let the sun shine right into America. Stop terrorizing and torturing your own fellow citizens (assuming you are, indeed, a citizen) and join the righteous of the world.

Mr. President Obama, don’t eat your citizens, love them. There can be no greater love than this: that a bad president gives up his administration for the world good.

Incidentally, those interested in remote torture can check out www.surveillanceissues.com for starters.

THE NEVER-ENDING OPPRESSION

2011-07-17T21:22:00.000-07:00

There don’t seem to be many authoritative voices that can be easily tapped on the Internet search services in regard to nations that have had to pay the longest periods of reparations after losing a war, but I doubt that any have had to pay as much and as long as Germany has. Although German leaders may have agreed to it and have shouldered the burden of guilt for “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity,” there is no excuse any longer for this basically coerced payment to continue.

The primary lesson to be drawn from the Nuremberg Trials is that the victorious side can put to death high-ranking political officials and military officers for acts that may have equaled the atrocities committed by the victorious side. These Trials may have also legitimized the enslavement of the German people to the Jewish people to whom they are paying tribute even today, as well as tribute to the Israeli nation.

Let me be blunt: the holocaust of the Jews is a fraud. Few people realize that the Jewish side of the proposition that six million Jews were gassed by the Nazis is overwhelmingly anecdotal, while those that have questioned this proposition have focused on the measurable facts, such as alleged procedures for sending groups of Jews into the chambers, the chambers themselves, the type of gas allegedly used, the venting process, the removal of the dead, the disposal of the dead, the cremation facilities, the cremation process, the time involved in cremations, the requirement to halt for maintenance, the nature of the chimneys, and other areas of the proposition that can be scientifically tested or mathematically calculated through standard engineering techniques.

Basically, the issue comes down to the acquired power of Jews to compel other people to accept the preposterous as factual and true. Certainly, claims by hordes of Jews with vested interests about losing five aunts and uncles, a granny, a husband/wife, and 2.3 children cannot overcome arguments based on known scientific facts and mathematics. Therefore, something other than the facts of the case must be understood as prevailing in the decision-making process.

This is not to say that a low percentage of Jews incarcerated in Nazi concentration camps may not have been murdered. Those wrongly murdered may have been murdered by Nazis, by other non-Jewish inmates, or by Jewish inmates. However, the issue here is the claim that six million Jews were murdered. One holocaust-friendly French historian calculated that about 775,000 Jews were murdered. That is a huge variation from the figure Jews have successfully claimed in American media and schools. The most reasonable calculation is that less than 300,000 Jews died from all causes - natural and unnatural - in the Nazi concentration camps.

There are Holocaust Museums everywhere, and they have been typically financed with other people’s money. I believe that the United States citizenry underwrite $50 million per year. American officials may not be able to find money to repair a bridge, but they always find money for this pet Jewish project (and most any other).

The fact that Jewry appears to be a criminal syndicate and acts like one may provide insight into why politicians, leading professionals and businessmen seem to always rush to provide them needed services. The worldwide usury racket of the Jews requires a certain amount of brute force to insure compliance. The U.S. military and N.A.T.O. are premier examples of the ready force that Jewry can engineer into its long-range projects.

The “all-seeing eye” of Jewry rarely misses opposition – even seemingly insignificant bloggers. The application of “break-leg” and “dirty-tricks” techniques are assigned to one of the numerous secular Jewish spying organizations, and such nefarious activity may be done in conjunction with fedcops. Encountering these people make you appreciate Jewish historian Hannah Arendt’s comment about the “banality of evil.” Indeed, it is as close and as common as the nearest Jewish school, where young Abe Reles and Tick Tock Tannenbaums have their natural malevolence groomed and aimed in what seems to Jewry as a positive role, spying on non-Jews.

What has Jewry done with all the tribute paid by Germany since the end of World War II? Well, assuming that Germany paid the Jews and Israel (sic) in German Marks, the best guess is that most of it was spent on needed products useful to a new nation and in investing in German property. Jewry always had a strong banking presence in Germany. Based on investment patterns in Great Britain and the U.S.A., one would suppose Jews invested in media, real estate, drugs and possibly cyber-associated businesses. One does know that German marks are not the currency of record in the Israeli state. While some may have been stockpiled for future use or for currency swaps, I believe that much of it went back into Germany as investments. Of course, ownership usually suggests control.

Many people don’t realize that no peace treaty was ever concluded with Germany, that it operates under a constitution known as the Basic Law which was imposed on it by the Allies, and that Germany is technically an occupied country.

Not surprisingly, the children of Germany have been indoctrinated in the Jewish deceit known as the Holocaust and mostly accept guilt for it. This crime against the human mind has never been arrested. This moral outrage has not brought forth a peep of concern from either the Roman Catholic Church or by most Protestant leaders. They are part of the problem.

Parenthetically, The Washington Post reported on its front page several years back that over 100,000 Jews had migrated to Germany. This paper seemed to find the data “good news.” Since the spanking new Jewish nation in the Levant welcomed Jews, one wonders why they preferred Germany. One motivation may have been to better oversee Jewish investments (you can’t really trust non-Jews, doncha know?).

Incidentally, the decline of Swiss Bank secrecy may be a result of the lack of need by Jews, due to the bustling banking business in Israel (sic). Don’t imagine for a moment that U.S. politicians would put the sort of pressure on the Jewish state that has been put on Switzerland anent bank secrecy. Even if they tried, Israeli officials would have none of it. Jews can defeat almost any American politician through media hostility and financing of opponent(s).

There are other people who have made claims for reparations that involved long periods of time. Only the Germans have paid for over sixty years to one alleged victim – the Jews. Although Israel wasn’t even a state when World War II occurred, it has also been a beneficiary of reparation payments.

Because Jewry behaves more like a criminal syndicate than a nation, it does not seem capable of ending the tribute payment itself. Although the preposterous claim of six million Jews gassed by the Nazis may – in the eyes of Jewry – constitute a wrong that cannot be made whole, its fictional nature reduces Jewish claims to a criminal scam.

Nevertheless, the ending of its demand for reparation from Germany for injuries suffered by Jewry during the Nazi period would constitute the single indication that Israel (sic) and world Jewry have matured into a respectable people. Until this oppression ends there is no reason to view Israel (sic) or Jewry as other than a variety of pirate.

ADOLPH'S DEAD

2011-07-09T15:54:00.000-07:00

On Friday, the eighth of July, 2011 I happened to be delivering an item to an individual who was scheduled to stay at the Hilton Hotel in Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia. I stopped at the registration counter to present it. First order of business was to check and verify that that individual was scheduled to stay at the hotel. Since she was not registered under the name I had been given, the clerk began a more thorough search. I waited.

Meanwhile, a man approached the counter next to my location. Another registration counter clerk greeted him. "What is your name?" she inquired.

He responded "Hitler." (My phonetic rendering of the name was "Hitler.")

I of course heard all this but paid no apparent interest.

The clerk who had greeted this man fell into a very awkward, meaningful pause. I could not help but feel embarrassment for this man - but also for this American woman's inadequacies.

Finally, she stammered, "German?"

He replied, "Austrian."

By this point the woman was regaining her composure a bit and proceeded along a relatively stable course of confirming and checking in the man known as "Hitler."

My own business was by now successfully concluded, and I left.

I never looked at "Hitler." I knew that he was already made to feel awkward by the clerk and I had no desire to contribute to this embarrassing situation.

My analysis of this situation is that both the clerk and "Hitler" were victims of the supremely obtuse approach of American educators and entertainers to the German Adolph Hitler of the 1930-1945 period of history. Since the great American media attempt to blend these two categories, it too reflects this historical dis-service of fearfully misrepresenting the man, Adolph Hitler, as a devil mixed up with monster.

With vast numbers of American children dragged off to "Holocaust Museums" for indoctrination, the injury to minds starts very early. The "mother-of-all-holocaust-museums" located in Washington, D.C. just off the Mall is barely distinguishable from a Halloween "haunted house," according to the emotions its displays are intended to engender.

"The horror! The horror!" moaned the Marlon Brando character in APOCALYPSE NOW.

Children in America are trained from childhood to think of Adolph Hitler as the most horrible demon the world has ever seen.

In fact Adolph Hitler was a visionary who loved Germany and thought that Germany should be "of, by and for the Germans" (quoting me). Being a visionary does not mean that one's vision is a correct one, or good one, or even desirable one in part or whole. Adolph Hitler was not the first nor the last example of the ethnocentric mind operating on the world stage.

What Adolph Hitler represented was either a barrier to world government (controlled by others) or a competing, unacceptable approach to world government. A clue to this may be found in the approach to national revenue/expenditure by Adolph Hitler in the 1933-1940 period.

The Holocaust asserted by the Jews is mostly anecdotal and contradictory, after the Edomite Jewish witnesses against Christ. The material facts relative to the assertions of the Jews have been shown to contradict the holocaust assertions. Result? Many of the brave academic specialists presenting the contradicting arguments in various aspects of the case have been thrown in jail on charges that boil down to "hurting the feelings of the Jews." As one German judge asserted, "The truth of the material presented is irrelevant."

This may be viewed as a bit of a digression by a reader, but my thrust is that the programs of Hitler were rational approaches that appeared to work to varying degrees. He was not a demon. However, it was useful to others who are also seeking a New World Order that his approach never be tried again. By making Hitler a "demon" his enemies (or users) can also make his approach "the road to hell." Who would voluntarily want to go there?

Therefore, when the registration counter clerk at the Hilton Hotel heard the name "Hitler," she was paralyzed by "the horror." Had the man said "Baron von Frankenstein," she would not have blinked an eye. In fact she would have been pleased that a "noble" planned to stay at her hotel. However, some twenty years of her life had absorbed enough horror indoctrination in regard to Adolph Hitler that her Pavlovian Response was inevitable. Alas, there are hordes of Americans that reflect the same crippled state of mind as she did.

MANCHURIAN CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS

2011-05-18T21:19:00.000-07:00

I've noticed from a number of prominent "Christian Zionists" a very similar manner of expressing why they hold the views that they espouse. John Hagee, the noted media preacher, has described a unique experience upon entering the present Israeli state, which appeared to be life-changing.

I recently heard almost a word-for-word recapitulation of Hagee's experience by Michele Bachmann, as she described her transformation.

I believe that Sarah Palin also spoke in transformational terms in regard to experiencing the Israeli state. One wonders if Israeli intelligence might be working a kosher MK-ULTRA program, as they experiment on how to co-op Protestants into litter-carrying servants.

The whole Tea Party Movement appears to be led by Protestants of this sort. They have all gone to Jerusalem to seek anointing from the Israeli leadership.

In the old days of America there were "America Firsters." The Tea Party crowd has introduced the modern "Israel Firsters." Nuking Iran is high on their agenda.

Sarah Palin was reported by one small news outlet to have worn on her lapel while governor of Alaska (and possibly prior to that) an Israeli national flag. One can be excused if s/he gets the crazy idea and wonders outloud if Palin and Bachmann might not be partially derived from "wandering Jews." Their attractiveness to Senators McCain and Lieberman certainly is not founded on their wearing American flag lapel pins.

After graduating from high school, Michele Bachmann felt the urge to go to live and work in a kibbutz in the Israeli state. Whether she gunned down any Palestinians is not known to me, but I don't think that that would have been a problem for her. It would be an unusual choice for a non-Jew, as such youth could have travelled to Cuba and cut sugar cane for Fidel, experiencing the communal life closer to home. Who knows? They might get to meet Ted Turner there.

The Protestantism generally associated with this sort of religious fervor is Dispensationism wedded to bizarre veneration of Jews based on unfounded interpretations of the Abrahamic covenant. Oddly, this group of "Christians" freely denounces "religious extremists."

I recall seeing a video presentation from a priest named John O'Connor, who stated that he could not wait to get out of the Israeli state because "everyone has guns."

It seemed that Isaac's son, Esau, was a hunter, and his seed has kept up the family tradition.

MURDER IN BETHESDA

2011-03-16T20:43:00.000-07:00

The police have been diligently investigating this recent murder at the Lululemon retail shop. According to radio accounts, police suspect that the crime was opportunistic, involving two men who were prepared to rob something or someone. They may have had one or two targets in mind as possibilities. Then, apparently, they saw two young women enter a darkened or dimmed shop and quickly followed them into it.

Once inside the shop, things got violent. One woman was sexually assaulted and murdered by blunt force. The other woman was sexually assaulted, battered (apparently), and tied up. Whether these two men actually stole anything was not clear from the police reports mentioned over the radio.

Is this not passing strange for a crime scenario?

Firstly, according to the report over the radio, the two men wore masks and gloves. They appeared to have prepared for a theft or robbery event. Preparation and some level of experience in these sorts of crime may be inferred. However, attacking the women seemed to be the primary event. This was not consistent with a robbery preparation. This was especially so due to the prominent location, the level of people walking and driving about Friday night in the 9 pm - 12 am time slot. An Apple Store was next door and had attracted a large crowd to view the new ipad.

Given the objective scenario at the time, a quick robbery would appear to be called for. Else, the women would be secured in the backroom somewhere until human traffic outside had become scarce. Then the robbers would scram with their loot. So what happened?

There was a possibility that Jayna Murray exposed the face of one of the men, resulting in an "eliminate the witness" scenario. If so, why was not the other woman killed for the same reason. It was possible that the two women had been taken to different areas of the store where visual contact was not possible. The reason for the latter event may have been twin rapes. One woman fought, exposing the face of her attacker, and the other did not fight.

However, the rape scenario doesn't seem valid under the circumstances, assuming two men prepared with masks and gloves entered an upscale shop. The risk-reward benefit doesn't favor rape as a primary mission.

What if murder was their primary mission? What if Jayna Murray had been the target all along? What if the other woman had a grudge against Ms. Murray? What if she arranged with the two "masked men" to meet her as she was rendezvousing with Ms. Murray. She had called Ms. Murray at her home to explain that she had left something inside the shop that she needed to retrieve. When Ms. Murray agreed, the other woman could have contacted the two men that the "hit was on."

There is the possibility that one of the two men had a personal relationship with the other woman. The alleged rape of this woman may have been by a regular sex-partner. On the alternate side if she had a third-party boyfriend who knew some men who might do the "hit," he may have called them after his girlfriend called to say that Ms. Murray had agreed to return.

Additionally, if Ms. Murray knew the other woman's boyfriend, however remotely, she might have recognized him, either by ripping away his mask or by guessing his voice. Then the witness was eliminated.

Usually, in an "eliminate the witness" scenario one would expect that both women would have been killed. They can't hang you twice. The two men did not appear to be pressured to "hurry up."

There may be some new revelation soon by the police. For the moment there seem to be valid reasons to be suspicious of the other woman's role in this despicable crime.

INTERNET SABOTAGE

2010-10-03T19:16:00.000-07:00

Recently, I complained about my problems with hackers and/or government saboteurs taking control of my computer to frustrate efforts at blogging or for the sheer pleasure of observing me watch with amazement as my monitor went crazy with rapidly opening and closing windows, displaying menus, applications, etc. They (my unsolicited co-pilots) are still here, and I have no idea when they will manifest themselves. However, when the more adolescent/juvenile minds among them are given freedom to "do their thing," the events are certain and frequent. Some level of adult (probably a fedcop) is normally present. If the adolescent/juvenile is present, they are not restrained. There is the impression that they operate under the emblem of a higher power than the fedcop does. That can only mean he, or they, are Jewish and connected.

Now, this is supposition, but it is also almost certainly true. One can look at any recent U.S. president and note the many Jewish advisers, cabinet officials, and high-office appointees. They are not there for love of the Jews necessarily; love for and fear of money would be more like it. Billy Jeff Clinton appointed more than 50% of the high-office vacancies to Jews. Jews provide the Democrat Party with over 50% of the donated money it receives.

Why would Jews care about a blog written by a little bitty American? They deeply resent any criticism. That fact may be missed by those accustomed to a "horse-laugh-it-off" approach. There happens to be no category of people on Earth who employ the word "hate" as much as the Jews. This should not be assumed an indication of righteousness on the part of Jews. Frequently it is aimed at individuals.

I have to admit to have studied Jews a bit. I have read what they have said about themselves and others. I have read what others have said about them.

Although most American know very little about Jews, assuming them to a range from Biblical characters to stand-up comedians, they rarely venture any real criticism. The vast majority either follow the late Rev. Jerry Falwell approach of saying no ill about Jews (fear of violating the Abrahamic covenant!!!) or the Rev. John Hagee approach of prolix praise.

As the actor Mickey Rooney once observed, "when you let other people take care of your business, you're out of business." Basically, that is the story of the decline of America. The "sons of the pioneers" handed the government over to "advisers."

Naturally, given the chance to seize power, the advisers did just that. Having gained power, they began to set up mechanisms to protect themselves, even as they also grasped for more power.

Propaganda by means of the media, entertainment, and educational tools, such as textbooks, teachers, principals, etc, helped create a "good press," while directing American minds at targets they should despise. These targets were typically enemies (aka, opponents) who were guilty of "hate," and other modern social disabilities. The opponents of the "advisers" never merely oppose; they always "hate."

As the Reverends Falwell and Hagee could have told you, "that's not love." "Love" of course is what "it's all about."

A blogger such as I who criticizes Jewry goes on Jewish "enemies lists." Organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith ("ADL") and the Southern Poverty Law Center keep an eye out for such enemies, making lists thereof, and informing the various fedcops and media. Then, Homeland Security announces it has uncovered data on growing numbers of "people who hate" and have put them on its "domestic terrorist watch list." That is how a blogger such as I can be "watched" without warrant or specific warning. Such observers would not interfere with Jewish "cyber-protection leagues."

Such organizations always defend their dirty deeds by allusion to their bogus "holocaust."

I recently received a mailing from American Free Press ("AFP") requesting donated help, after a near fatal attack on their website (americanfreepress.net). Since this small media outlet is an America First citadel in a land of New World Order robonews outlets, zionist and Israel First interests do not wish it well. The attack on the American Free Press website can be compared to the attack on the US Liberty, the American intelligence ship attacked in 1967 by the IDF. It was devastating but the enemy did not prevail, due to the courageous defense offered by the Americans.

In the letter from AFP there was an allusion to the attack launched against Pat Buchanan's website. The implication was that websites that criticize Jewry or Israel tend to be targets for "hate-crime hackers."

I can only state a sense that this implication is correct. Buchanan has denounced anti-Semitism, as has AFP. I don't, since the term is used consistently by Jewish organizations, as well as noteworthy individuals, in the sense of opponent.

Opposition to a Jewish proposition is usually characterized as "hate." Europe has several academic types in jail, and heavily fined as well, for printing or orating views harmful to the "holocaust" assertion. Jewish interests have made the facts "irrelevant," since these people were accused of causing a race or religion to suffer embarrassment and disrespect before the world community. Hence, although what these jailed men said were factual evidence, which were not defeatable by Jewish "intellectuals," they were guilty anyway. As one German judge pointedly noted, "the truth of the statement is irrelevant."

That sort of thing was the reason that George Orwell wrote his novels of political warning. He had encountered that sort of thinking amongst the revolutionary socialists with whom he had shared a period of solidarity prior to his disaffection.

Today, America has Senator Joseph Lieberman and others trying to curtail the irresponsible freedom of the Internet. Media such as The Washington Post are acceptable voices on the Internet, but American Free Press is not. However, bloggers, such as I, are thought to be the real problem.

I blog under several names on different web hosts. I don't strive for material omission as a characteristic of my blogs. However, since few feel compelled to "cover" the most powerful and unruly element in the world, I give it a go.

That is reason enough for the "advisers" to proceed against me. J'accuse!

After the Inslaw software Promis was developed by the Willams, contracted for by the Department of Justice, and the uncontracted for "improved Promis" software stolen during the Ed Meese tenure as Attorney General, it was only a matter of time before it was "tweaked" to provide a spying "backdoor" to virtually any computer.

Since the fedcops have already begun citing their "fears" to their favorite media-mouths of "domestic terror" and "homegrown terror," Internet cyber-spying and "dirty tricks" are now assured as a federal government clandestine policy. Attacks by drone cyber-missiles launched from a plethora of websites is certain.

Interestingly, the fedcops are capable of using "false-flag" websites whereby to mislead the American public regarding the actual origins of the attack. Today, radical Muslim organizations will probably be accused. The probably dead Osama bin Laden has already been magnified to the size of Dr. Manhattan.

However, a real opponent might be the Peoples Republic of China, whose long-time cozy relationship with Jews and Israel have made it the beneficiary of all high-tech American developments the Israelis could steal either directly or through zionists. This state of affairs goes back at least to the '80s, as the old Liberty Lobby tabloid, The Spotlight, featured articles on this dangerous state of affairs. (Incidentally, The Spotlight was attacked relentlessly in the courts by the ADL, by "holocaust" propagandists, and by agents of the C.I.A., such as the late Howard Hunt, and eventually put out of business. Morale: Deep pockets prevail at law.)

Hence, the preparations and precedents have been set to annihilate opposition, while completely flimflamming Americans in regard to the real purpose. The attack on my computer is merely a "drop in the cyber-bucket" at what lies ahead.

AMERICA THE TERRIBLE

2010-10-01T21:54:00.000-07:00

I heard on the radio news that fedcops are increasingly on "red alert" in regard to "home-grown" terrorists. One area that seemed to be especially worrisome was the Internet. The Obama Administration is now on the look-out for "Websites Of Mass Destruction."

These websites report things such unwanted data and theories about 9/11, the "Holocaust", Iraqi oil, Afghanistani opium fields, depleted uranium, the massacre of US Liberty, legal tender, immigration, and the like. The fedcops have been deployed to prepare a blizkrieg of such dangerous sites that pose such a threat to the Establishment's Rule By Material Omission.

There were rumors that Senator Lieberman would soon present a bill to limit the internet to zionists, whether Jewish, Muslim, or "Christian." The Pentagon was rumored to be experimenting with what it called a "Kosher Internet."

Once a responsible Internet has been established, then the threat from Websites of Mass Destruction will be much lessened.

In the meantime America's intelligence agencies, working with fedcops and state police, hope to hack into as many terrorists websites as possible, using the sort of young, arrogant minds that built Facebook as their battering rams, to seek and destroy "the enemy."

As was rumored among "ruling circles" for years, the people deserve only appearances. Since major media controls appearances, the people are assured of material omission on every big story. Still, one can't be too careful. On any given day, a terrorist may plant a set of facts on the Internet, and thus threaten our way of life.

For that reason a grateful Barack Obama turns his heads to his IT Hack-Attackers and says: "Greetings, Rosenkrantz and gentle Guildenstern!"

IT'S THE MONEY CREATION, STUPID!

2010-09-23T22:08:00.000-07:00

President Obama continually states that he has done just about everything humanly possible to "jump start" the economy. He has greatly enriched Wall Street banks and other large banking and financial institutions. Surely they will soon loan enough of this money to industry - both large and small - to promote job-creation.

Why should these large banks invest these funds given to them by Uncle Sam in the name of the people in risky enterprises, when they can take this money and put them in Treasury bonds where they can safely double or triple their money? They can borrow additionally money from the "Federal" Reserve at near zero interests and invest this in U.S. bonds (or other relatively safe bonds) and double or triple their money.

They exist, as do bloodsucking parasites (bedbugs, leeches, ticks, et al), and there is little reason to free themselves from Uncle Sam's body and risk the dangers of finding other hosts. Only after swelling to immense size will they take a risk, usually setting up the next cycle of increasingly bad loans.

President Obama hasn't come close to tackling the problem, as the problem is systemic. It is founded on the originating of money through private banks in a system that creates about 90% of it monetary aggregates by means of debt. The U.S. provides the "Federal" Reserve with bonds as collateral for "cash" which are merely ledger creations out of nothing.

Commercial banks take 10% (or whatever the reserve figure required) of all deposits and set that amount aside as a "Federal" Reserve deposit. They loan out the other 90%, if they choose to do so. This created money ends up as a deposit in the originating bank or another, and goes through the same process, the bulk of the funds reloaned. Hence, a pyramiding of "created money" takes place. Inevitably, a deflation of the "created money" occurs, as bad loans increasingly appear on bank books.

Instead of this complicated nonsense, the system should be changed to one in which the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the U.S. Bureau of the Mint in conjunction create positive legal tender. The whole of the American economy can easily adjust to it.

The money can be injected into the economy by means of infrastructural works paid for by the issuance of legal tender (as Abraham Lincoln did with his original "greenbacks"). It could also be injected through the Social Security Administration's Social Security and Medicare payments. The Defense Department could pay for its war equipment and personnel by means of this money.

All our relationships with foreign nations should be altered to reflect these changes. All our "connections" with the extra-American nations and companies/peoples were man-made by our "statesmen" and can be unmade by patriotic, wise statesmen. It is not a declaration of hostility toward the world beyond our shores, but that we place our interests first.

As part of the latter adjustment, tariffs should be applied to all products coming to our shores on the basis of labor costs. Our workers should not be consigned to slave labor rates because our competition employs slave labor. American industry should not be obliged to flee America to survive. Equality of rates should be obtained by adjusting extra-national rates to reflect the rates our workers in the same or very similar industries are paid. This would also encourage the outside world to pay decent wages.

Lastly, American industry that operates entirely domestically should receive tax reductions, as compared to international corporations. In no case should an international corporation operating in the United States have lower taxes than an entirely domestic company.

All internationalist citizens should be encouraged to leave their property in America and go to England, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, et al, where they would reside among kindred spirits.

President Obama was, is, and will always be a Wall Street and Lasalle Street agent. What he can squeeze in as an expression of solidarity with Karl Marx, he will no doubt do. He will never solve the systemic problem of negative money. He will only participate in the jump-starting of the next episode of inflating the debt-balloon.

CIVIL WAR?

2010-09-10T09:14:00.000-07:00

There is a Biblically-based bromide in regard to a "house divided." The force of the comment is that such houses cannot stand. Unfortunately, the Celto-Germanic population has accepted quite the opposite assertion: "Diversity means strength." A racially-based assessment of "house" is the proper way of looking at "house." A house is a place for a family. Families are typically units of clans or tribes. Clans or tribes are typically units of nations. Nations are typically ruled by governments. The form of a government may be agreed upon mutually by the tribes or clans (and ultimately by the families), or it may be compelled by tyrantical force.

Since nations carry a difficult-to-escape racial foundation, an attack on the concept of "nation" is also an attack on the concept of "race."

Many times in history a powerful leader of a skilled army has conquered many nations and welded them into an unnatural governmental unit which has been termed "empire." The former nations have sometimes had a degree of autonomy returned to them by the conguering tyrant. Both Darius and Alexander the Macedon did this. In these cases the empire took on a feudal character where by the conquered nations provided tribute, certain services, including fighting men, and received the protection of the tyrant in return.

An empire is only as strong as the tyrant who leads it. The strength of nations rests upon its people. Therefore, strategically, miscreant advisers to tyrants, or functional tyrants, such as powerful secret societies, advise an attack on the people of any given nation.

In ancient Biblical examples whole groups of people, such as the Norther Kingdom of Israel, were moved to other areas, while their former territory was occupied by alien people, who typically were also forced to move into the vacated land(s). If a trouble-making group of people were moved from their accustomed homeland, then they would have to spend much time and energy trying to adjust to the new environment. That would tend to make them both more dependent on the tyrant and less of a problem, as they devoted energy to rationalizing their new homeland.

The last four hundred years in Europe and in their developing overseas arms (colonies) witnessed the decline of monarchs. There the idea developed that sovereignty resided in the people of the nation. This latter idea was most naturally and wholesomely expressed in the Republican form of government. The view that "kings" as a carnal extrapolation of the people and symbol thereof began to decline in favor of legislative bodies.

In regard to legislative bodies the ideal of noble-minded individuals meeting for purposes of lofty debates on the best course for the "ship of state" was soon exposed. Increasingly, legislatures became seen as sites where venal men took bribes from private interests or simply "ripped off" the public purse. Naturally, the Republican form of government became hostage to the plutocratic forces in the nation - and beyond.

Legislators continued to use the idioms of accepted, noble thought, but they were mere shells. Corruption has certain visible signs. The increase of national debt was one. The constant involvement in distant wars was another. The sheer length and density of legislature was another.

In regard to involvement in distant wars, this must be viewed in context. However, there could hardly be justification on a national basis for a string of such wars. In these the signature of the "merchants of death" should be apparent. They have the influence with "patriotic" politicians, with powerful sections of the military, and even with sections of organized labor. They also work hand-in-glove with the great banking interests, which are, today, international institutions not necessarily loyal to the nation in which they began.

As plutocratic power grew in America and Europe, its agents in secret societies infiltrated all major sectors of the nation's spiritual and material infrastructure to set up the mechanisms for imploding them. A New World Order required a new set of supporting structures; ones that secured the rule of the rich and their ideological "break-legs." The latter, assisted by communist hoodlums and/or civil protestors, provided the "law" to create order out of the chaos that they caused to occur in the first place.

The basic means whereby Western nations have been defeated by underlings yearning to be rich and powerful was provided by Mr. Charles Dickens in his novel DAVID COPPERFIELD. In the episode involving the vile Uriah Heep, the British and the world were warned prophetically of their danger. The high became low, and the low became high. Dickens' message was totally missed.

THE LAST COLONY?

2010-04-23T18:15:00.000-07:00

The 20th century might well be considered the twilight of the colonial system of government. Most of the territory which European countries operated as colonies have been voluntarily or forcibly (or both) released to independence. Usually, this has been done with a deep bow to "democracy." If these independent "new nations" should see their governments transformed into dictatorships, the former ruling countries may decide to intercede at the request of "democratic forces" within the former colonies to give tyranny "whatfor." Soon thereafter, an exiled "leader" will be placed before the people for a vote. If the people vote for someone else, then the election will be declared "rigged" and "fraudulent." A new election will be arranged at the request of "democratic forces" by the former masters of the colony.

Jews operate the last territorial colony. The Israeli state in the Levant is actually a colony operated by World Jewry. In Jerusalem the modern Jewish center was situated to provide religio-cultural (political) guidance to the global Jewish nation. The global Jewish nation is the archipelago of Jewish communities across the globe. These communities are overwhelmingly situated in large urban areas.

The first Jews to this area were explicit colonizers. The Rothschild interests operated a number of concerns that utilized these "pioneers' " labor. Zionists organizations in Europe and America encouraged settlers to move to this new colony that surrounded and protected the long-desired center in Jerusalem. Collective farming and other businesses operated out of kibbutzim, manned sometimes by temporary Jewish volunteers, who might stay for a couple of years. Fund-raising helped to further the colonial effort. Still, the pace was slow because the life was hard.

Jews were doing pretty well in Europe, the British Commonwealth nations, and in America. Life was good. Going to jejune Palestine was "okay" as a visit -maybe have a picture taken on a camel - but to live? They needed that like another loch in kop.

Post-World War II changed everything. German reparations made possible long-term funding of a new Israeli state which, like the United Nations, was planned long before the end of WW II. Using political influence and newly assumed "moral authority," Jews were able to start a foreign aid program for the Israeli state that would evolve into annual multibillion dollar grants. Thus, an instant welfare state, known as Israel (sic), was created. Many Jews could now see moving to the Israeli state as a possibility.

Debt-mongering and usury became not only a means to become master of vast stretches of land across the globe through political control of the indebted citizens of many nations, it allowed the Jewish World Community to fashion a rich and militarily powerful Jewish state whose center, Jerusalem, became more and more the moral and legal arbiter of the world community. Roman Popes would humble themselves before the High Rabbi of Jerusalem. American Protestant leaders would pledge undying fealty to the Israeli state.

Still, all in all, and excluding the special case of Jewry, the days of colonial rule seem to be over. There have been new means of exploitation developed in the former master states. The premier means of exploitation nowadays is loans at usury to "developing" countries. Chattle slavery and indentured labor have given way to chronic, habitual bond-slavery. The citizens of today line up to sale their great-grand- children into bond-slavery. In America the citizens have moved from spending their children's inheritance in the '60s & '70s, to spending their grandchildren's inheritance in the '80s & '90s, to spending their great grandchildren's inheritance in the 2000s 2010s, and so on.

As with any colonial system, the wealth of the exploited land tends to collect in the coffers of the debt-mongers. These latter represent the masters of the "new colonial system" now operating. Everything depends on usury. It is usury and "fancy" maneuvering that made Goldman Sachs the leading edge of the scores of trillions of dollars of derivatives that have been floated.

As paper bondage floated toward the Western hoi polloi, real wealth floated to the masters of the new colonial system.

Just as Christianity could find a way to legitimize the European-dominated colonial system, so it has had no difficulty in blessing the "new colonial system" of debt and usury. Yet, most Christians aren't the benficiaries of this new system; for the most part they are victims. When Christian clergy are pinned in a corner, they will argue that the present system is the least objectionable of a series of bad options.

Although this would seem insane policy, if a clergy were dependent on tithes from congregations that were being made poorer by a colonial debt-n-usury system, the fact is that many denominations have heavy investments in stocks and bonds. They are more concerned with how their investment portfolio is doing than the general welfare of their congregations.

In a slave system there are usually two categories: slave master and slave. Yet, there is usually room for a tiny group of "freemen." These are debt-free tradesmen and the like. The most important of these are the procurors, who bring in more bond slaves for the masters. Religious leaders tend to be either procurors or vouchers for the "goodness" of the debt-mongers and usury.

Ultimately, the largest debt-mongers must devour the smaller ones. It can get pretty ugly.

DODGING INTERNET BOMBS

2010-04-05T21:44:00.000-07:00

As many people know by now, the internet is a network full of "improvised explosives" which a variety of retrograde types set. Most people are by now well familiar with terms such as "malware" and "viruses." A recent phenomenon is internet bullying. The internet provides a veil which the incourageous can utilize to commit their brand of terror in typically anonymous fashion.

Using such "hit-n-run" or "improvised explosives," otherwise feckless people can imagine themselves powerful beings.

Regularly, the media references massive "hacking" attacks on the DOD or other government agencies and suggests that the perpetrator(s) may be from within, say, the Peoples Republic of China. At other times the attacked cyber-center may be part of a corporate entity. Motivation for such attacks range from espionage to juvenile "cyber-delinquencies." Occasionally, even "terror" is cited as the apparent motivation.

For ordinary internet users the typical advice is to install a good security program, which several companies offer. In so far as these companies make sure that their programs are updated regularly to defend against the latest lethal virus someone has dreamed up to "deep-six" your computer, your security program should protect your life on the internet.

Since the profile of potential attackers within the U.S.A. runs the gamut of sophisticated foreign cyber-attackers to fedcop dirty-tricks departments to secular, or private, dirty-trick departments to the neighbor cyber-twit, the source can be a real mystery. Those directly connected to an internet source such as cable may have some added protection.

However, those who operate on a wireless internet system may be vulnerable to a discreet, targeted interdiction by any of the above groups for any reason (to them) that seems good. For example, it is possible for the C.I.A. to have begun "testing" of the MK-Ultra type, using the Internet. Since it seems incredibly far-fetched, the likelihood is even better that it might be done. Few would credit the initial victims of MK-Ultra with pointing out a real danger. Instead, they would have been thought to be a little "paranoid." Given the drugs that the C.I.A. was using, they may, in fact, have been paranoidal. However, that would not make their assertions necessarily incorrect.

Humans are "guinea pigs" to leading political circles, not just in America, but throughout the world community. The wealthier the nation, the more diabolical the designs of certain ruling circles therein. The leading circles of poor countries tend to merely hack the hapless into pieces.

I frequently receive sudden messages while blogging or doing work on the Internet that "You have no internet connectivity." It can and did "bomb" certain work which I was doing but which had not been automatically saved. There was nothing for it but to start again. Do you pause to save every sentence? Maybe you wait until you finished a paragraph?

From my understanding of the wireless connection to the Internet, the user is availing himself/herself of a radio wave. Some sort of "band" which is transmitted at a certain range, frequency, etc., which is unique to that modem/router. Computerized devices that are part of the network should not have any problem linking up with it. Oh, maybe occasionally a explosion on the sun, or something, floods Earth with rays that disturb the air which is the medium for the waves in the band. Otherwise, within a house there should not be excessive regular interference.

However, during WW II, and thereafter, radio waves signals could be jammed. The U,S.S.R. and Warsaw Pact nations regularly jammed Radio Free Europe. I believe that the U.S.A. jammed Cuba radio transmissions. There are probably endless examples between nations of Jamming.

It is my view that jamming of wireless Internet connections is possible and is done. I believe that it is frequently done to my own. I believe that, while it is possible that elements of the fedcops, such as F.B.I. or Homeland Security, are not above doing these kinds of "dirty tricks," that the better likelihood in my case is that descendants of the ruling circles in the old U.S.S.R. or Warsaw Pact nations, who first descended upon America around the turn of the 20th Century and eventually gained dominant influence, having given some of their lesser offspring the task of "punishing" through "dirty tricks" the remnant of real Americans with old-fashioned, real American values, founded on Christianity, the Bible, and the practical experiences of living as Americans for hundreds of years (in my case 400 years).

Hence, while their "great men" go about with the heavy duty of operating the Tyranny of the Minority in America, their misbegotten children amuse themselves at the expense of America's righteous Lots. Jamming wireless transmissions would be such an amusement.

THE WAR AGAINST RACE

2010-03-28T01:11:00.001-07:00

Robert Putnam, a Harvard political scientist, interviewed nearly 30,000 Americans in coming up with a report, E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century, which stated the obvious: white, blacks, Irish, Jews and all American ethnic groups prefer to live among and socialize with their own kind.

“The greater the diversity in a community, the less civic engagement it shows,” [Clarence] Page wrote of Putnam’s report. “Fewer people vote. Fewer volunteer. They give less to charity. They work together less on community projects.” And “they trust each other less,” Page admits, “not only across racial and ethnic lines but also within the lines. In other words, residents of the most racially and ethnically mixed neighborhoods show the least trust not only of other races but also people of their own races.”

Clarence Page is a black “conservative” columnist. Does he, then, believe that government should let people enjoy “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness?”

“Heavens to Betsy, no!” is Page’s hysterical reaction. The government must take military-style action to impose “diversity,” Page argues.
[citation from American Free Press, September 17 & 24, 2007, page 15, “AFP ON MULTICULTURALISM” by James P. Tucker, Jr.]

Does Mr. Page really want diversity, or does he really want its opposite? There is no compelling rationale for diversity within a political economy. Therefore, its artificial engineering by means of law fails the test of reasonableness. The marked willingness of the elite to use fixed bayonets to achieve for them what reasonable argument cannot suggests an ulterior motive. When all inequality is viewed as “undesirable” and even as “dangerous,” a society has positioned itself to walk through the doors of bedlam. The bell cows of looniness will guide it in. The doctors await. Can shock treatment be far behind?

This short article, appearing in the AFP issue cited above, delves into surely the most misrepresented and most certainly scholar-unfriendly area of today in America. The observer is asked to treat with respect and an “open” mind such competing propositions as “race is an illusion,” “race is observable,” “there is only one race,” and “there are at least several races, depending on definition.”

The system of defining creation is alleged to have begun in the “Garden of Eden” when Adam took on the task of naming the “flora & fauna.” That happens to be my anchor. In modern times the European Linnaeus provided the definitive base for biological ordering. Again, this is an anchor in my view of this subject.

The word “species” is derived from the Latin word, meaning “to see.” Therefore, the employment of this word requires first and foremost the ability to recognize and distinguish. When patterns amongst life forms within the flora & fauna manifest them, tend to be replicated through generations, involve groups that recognize one another and live together, and which, if they replicate sexually, do so within the group, such patterns may involve such species. Nature tends to be generally exclusive. Therefore, the black oak tends to replicate with black oak; the red oak tends to replicate with red oak; the white oak tends to replicate with white oak; and the pin oak tends to replicate with pin oaks. Do these ever have “mixed marriages?” The answer seems to be: Not very often, if at all. Nor is there a likelihood that the fruit of such “marriages” will long survive.

Of course, animal forms tend toward the same exclusivity, but not to the extent of plants. Mating between distinct variations, if not species, occur. Witness the occasional mix of lion and tiger, horse and zebra, etc. Of all the animal forms, humans are the most adventurous in this regard. On the animal level human tampering with nature is often the most essential factor resulting in, say, a horse-burro mix, a zebra-horse mix, a lion-tiger mix, and so on. There seems to be a curiosity within humans in regard to the question: “What happens when you cross…?”

For me, once again, Scripture and Apocrypha, provide an anchor. “As in the days of Jared…” Whether there are angels, whether some came to Earth “to teach men,” whether some of these taught the unnatural mixing of flesh, I cannot say. But some sort of misuse of nature, I believe, was occurring at that time.

In our time there can be little doubt that scientists across the globe are experimenting in the mix of flesh fit to make the Watchers of Apocrypha proud. We are advised by them and by industries which employ their techniques how wise and beneficial their “advances” are. In fact scientist are insisting for themselves a role consistent with that of a superior caste, whose work is not understood by the benighted masses and which work can not be abridged at all by these mere “children,” who are too ill-equipped to make such judgments.

Would it be absurd to suppose that they believe that cow’s milk squeezed from a banana is a sound idea? And many another such scheme as well? Although some may devise a stronger grain vis-à-vis a blight by this means, one gets the feeling that there are plenty of scientists in this field who have become “deranged” by the fantastic possibilities. I, for one, have no doubt that human experimentation, utilizing non-human genes, has occurred “big-time.”

If one can validly assert that there are highly intelligent men, scientists, men remarkably skilled, who are so convinced of the good of a project they envision, that they proceed with their work without undue concern for the views of the great bulk of their fellow citizens, then I think that we have stumbled across the very sorts who force discrete groups into special social chambers, where they can be artificially blended. Since such scientists try to operate in an objective and detached fashion, their very techniques tend to shear the human “guinea pigs,” or “specimens,” as the case may be, of their humanity. In the process of doing this, these scientists most certainly lose their own. Yet, in bedlam who notices insanity? In the brotherhood of the lab, what doctor puts sound ethics and morality before his experimentation upon Herr Mouse? Do their mouths and hearts act as one?

In regard to these “scientists,” alluded to above, we find a sort of hybrid mind at work. Such people seem to be blends of the scientific minds of the Age of Reason, as found in Europe, and the mystical mind of the Mystery Religions. One sees and notes the rational observation of form and structure, wedded to the incantations and symbols of the “golem-makers.” All in all, there seems to be a certain appropriateness here. These are the “sorcerer’s apprentices,” stirring up a New World Order. They need to produce a New Man to inhabit it. What choice have they but a global hybrid? What means other than government troops with fixed bayonets compelling it? With such an order can a Resident Evil be far behind?

SHAM-TEMPEST IN TEA PARTY

2010-03-27T21:52:00.000-07:00

According to radio reports today, Tea Party demonstrators were gathered in the town where Harry Reid dwells, when not in washington, D.C. Sensibly, he welcomed the visitors and expressed the hope that they spend freely while in town, as the town and state could use an economic boost.

Leading the demonstrators were the likes of Sarah Palin, former governor of Alaska. That she is an opportunist seems a given, viewing her recent track-record. Wherever and whenever a ship of fools sets forth to sea, the helm tends to fall into the hands of predators, who put their private servants to work, guiding and controlling the ship. So it is with wounded, besieged America.

As with the U.S.S. Liberty, the American ship of state is being bombed and strafed. Destruction is the end-game.

Under these circumstances one would expect to see Senator John McCain and Sarah Palin, his former running mate, in prominent "leadership" positions. The dubious character and connections of Senator McCain have been raised enough in the past that he is somewhat known. Not so, Sarah Palin.

According to Texe Marrs in his March 2010 Power of Prophecy bulletin, Sarah Palin "was first 'discovered' by Jewish rabbis in Alaska. They reported their find to their Mossad superiors, and, Presto!, Palin moved right up to the Governor's suite. She promptly went over to Israel and was auditioned on Tel Aviv's popular The Tamar Jonah Show, Israel's equivalent of CNN's The Larry King Show. The Israeli press dutifully reported that Ms. Palin was 'The most pro-Zionist of all 50 of America's governors.' "

It goes to say that such credentials would impress John McCain's handlers. Both John McCain and Sarah Palin are "spiritual" dual-citizens, having the Israeli state as a "comfy" fall-back country, if they have to split.

Texe Marrs spent some time on the little-known Jewish connection to Palin. He identified witnesses to her true devotion. For example, he informed his readers that "The Chief Rabbi in Anchorage, Alaska, reported that Sarah Palin almost daily wore not an American flag pin, but an Israeli flag pin on her wardrobe. The Zionist authorities also boasted that the Jews' national flag, the satanic six-pointed star, also decorated the curtains in her Governor's office."

I have no qualms about Sarah Palin indicating where her heart calls home; however, I resent her pouncing on thin evidences of American patriotism and loudly, with the help of the media, trying to grab the steering mechanism. She's not alone, of course. To neutralize the Tea Party Movement, media-anointed "conservatives" popped up everywhere and almost at once. They all have money. They all are rabid supporters of the Israeli state.

Back in the '60s, Nelson Rockefeller was quoted as saying that he didn't worry about conservative Republicans or Democrats because they didn't have two quarters to rub one against the other. I paraphrase the quote but it is about exact and certainly has that sense.

Is no one suspicious about wealthy conservatives who denounce government spending, etc., but who are invariably stout supporters of the Jewish state. Frequently, they express approval of "nuking" Iran (or whoever has been designated the "demon nation" at the time by the Israelis). Who do they think comprised the intellectual force that turned "free-enterprise" America into the big-spending, big-borrowing, deconstructed, borderless, internationalist basket-case nation of today? Back in the '70s, President Nixon rued the U.S.A. becoming a "pitiful giant" that was full of nuclear weapons and unable to halt ragtag insurrectionists.

No one typically asks why any American politician would thinks that it is our duty to force the bullies of the world to behave? This nation doesn't produce the sort of politicians who could make Wall Street bullies behave. To do that this country would have had to produce Protestant ministers who charged their congregations to follow Jesus' example and drive the moneylenders out of the temple. Instead, thanks to Freemasonry's infiltration into the theological seminaries, brotherhood and tolerance are the watchwords. With these kinds of preachers the wicked need not fear being called a "viper." Perverted to the helt, they meekly beg, "Hurt me!"

To return to Texe Marrs, this brave fellow observed in his bulletin that "Impressed, the Israeli Mossad then sent American Jewish big shots like Connecticut's Senator Joseph Lieberman, former Clinton advisor (now a paid Fox News 'consultant') Dick Morris, and neocon journalist and Republican Party king-pin William Kristol (publisher, The Weekly Standard) over to Alaska on cruise ships and jets to audition her and check out her 'Israel First' loyalty. The Zionist lobbying giant, the militant American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), also got into the act."

Needless to say, Sarah Palin passed with flying colors (unfortunately, not those of the U.S.A.) and her meteroric rise was capped (temporarily) by her selection as running-mate to Senator John McCain. As you may recall, Senator Joseph Lieberman, McCain's pal, decided against running. Parenthetically, Sen. Lieberman has been described as a Jew who studies the Talmud, which is the religio-cultural constitution of the religious Jew, on an almost daily basis. Naturally, that would leave little time for studying the U.S. Constitution. Apparently neither McCain nor Lieberman believe that it is relevant in the era of "public policy."

A final comment from Texe Marrs' article:

"The very day that Sarah Palin spoke at the Republican Party nominating convention and gave that now famous speech with the clever line about putting lipstick on a pig, she had earlier met privately for almost three hours in her hotel suite with two Zionist power-brokers: Senator Joseph Lieberman and the head of AIPAC. Talk about putting lipstick on pigs!"

No movement can retain its America First, patriotic vitality, when it is led by Zionists. They have a completely different agenda. Either from the viewpoint of the late Vladimir Lenin or Zionism, the members of the Tea Party Movement are merely "useful idiots" to be channeled into the advancement of the Zionists' agenda.

CENSORSHIP

2010-01-02T23:21:00.000-08:00

Recently, I noticed that a favorite blog I followed "bit the dust." Apparently, the issue was "taboo" subjects. The blog appeared on WordPress.com, and the blogger was Nomoonnight. He was not advocating adultery, incest, nor "man-boy love" societies. He did poke fun at the rich and powerful in America and the world at large. "Not good!" snarled the nabobs at WordPress.com. However, what really "ticked" them off was that his targets were often Jews. That is viewed as inherently anti-Semitic. "Why would anyone criticize the Jews?" asked the nabobs at WordPress.com, who are often - well, - Jews.

It is a fair question. My answer would begin with the fact that 3 or 4 percent of the American population has achieved dominance in regard to many areas of national policy-making. This same group has achieved dominance in the media and entertainment areas. This group has sliced off about 40 percent of Harvard University, if one combined faculty, administration, and student populations (but exclude maintenance workers). They are likewise a far heavier proportion of the human population at most of the prestigious universities. This group I reference is Jewry.

If this group was composed of "whites," Jews would be leading the cries of outrage about "disparate results." Jews are not concerned with disparate results if it targets Jews, although quietly amongst themselves they my voice concern. At a meeting of the Harvard Club there might be a "sheepish" grin. "Lots of Jews!" one might exclaim with a wink and chuckle.

Poor Chuck! He didn't know which way the wind blew!

For all his witty and ascerbic commentary about the rich and about Jewry, Nomoonnight "bought the bullet" by criticizing the "Holocaust." This exceedingly dubious proposition has devotees who treat "deniers" as if they were blaspheming "wackos." They have great power in Europe, as well as America.

To save Jews from shedding bitter tears on account of "doubters" attacking the proposition that the Hitler regime gassed six million Jews, they've had their trollops in every legislature in Europe, as well as Britain and its Commonwealth, outlaw "facts of science, engineering, chemistry, and architecture." Facts and evidence are not admissible as a defense against the charge lodged against "deniers" because they are "crimes against humanity." You see, the Jews were the alleged victims of the Holocaust and have longed wailed this fact to a world that they wish to make guilty. To deny the alleged facts as erroneous singles out Jewry as liars and worse. That's racist and anti-Semitic. In Germany Frau Merkel, a "former" communist, will throw you in jail for such blasphemy as "denying the Holocaust." As one German judge put it about two years ago, "truth is no defense against the law."

Some of you may be aware that the U.S.S.R., early in its creation, made anti-Semitism a capital offense. It helped that the "Russian" revolution was organized by, funded by, and commanded by Jews. Jews do protect their own interests.

This again was made plain by WordPress.com's "suspending" Nomoonnight's blog. They'll undoubtedly win the Myra Breckenridge Award from The Washington Post for "holocausting" Nomoonnight. That this was a Jewish targeting is without doubt. In the suspending process, they made plain that they would not "confer" about the reason that they found fault. They did not relate if it was a single blog, a single subject treatment, or anything else that offended them. They stated that they have rules which all submit to in registering for a blog. They stated that they aren't obliged to explain anything. They treasure their rules; and, if they think you, a blogger, violated one, they have the right to suspend you without ever going into the specifics nor allowing the blogger the option of correcting the "error(s)."

How do I know this? I know Nomoonnight. He's an "up front" sort of guy.

This blogger, Nomoonnight, had over a hundred lengthy pages & posts at his blog site, which were published at WordPress.com. Many were controversial. Whatever rule transgression appeared at his blog page, the nabobs of WordPress.com took the opportunity to make all the blogs unreachable. They are not to be read, enjoyed or thought about said the Great Censors; they are to be "deep-sixed" and never see the light of day again.

Folks, this is fear wedded to overweaning power. Be grateful that you're not a Jew, looking over your shoulders, wondering when your crimes will be discovered. Fear does crazy things to people. It's best to be a Euripidesian mensch. Let the rich and powerful worry about the gathering "wackos."

As many blog-hosting websites are controlled by Jews, there will undoubtedly be many other "suspended" blogs - until Jews can bring the sort of "law and order" to the internet which they have brought to Germany, Europe, the British Commonwealth and soon "The World Community."

As for the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, its application, as with true charity, is increasingly attenuated. I'm sure the supreme Court will "pick its spots" upon proper advisement. Blog-hosting websites will not be such a spot. Its spirit lives, but only in victims of its employment. "Freedom of thought" on blogs, - we hardly knew ye.

THE CASE OF THE VANISHING MONEY

2009-12-22T19:51:00.000-08:00

I was going about my business today of spreading Christmas cheer, when I heard over the car radio that there was a report in The Wall Street Journal that Citigroup had been attacked by "Russian" hackers, who got away with millions of dollars - maybe billions (who knows?). An industrialist named "Blanchard" had been hit more than once. According to him, the first fraudulent transaction remonved $800,000 from his account. The Wall Street Journal account seemed to imply that the FBI was working on the case. Apparently, a bank in Lithuania was involved.

According to the radio report, spokespersons for Citigroup denied any FBI involvement in the matter. They state that all accounts were now with accurate balances. "Tempest in a teapot" seemed to be the Citigroup "take" on the matter.

The radio report then was followed with some breathless talk about cyber-crime and its portent for us all. One reporter was dumbfounded that a "Russian" gang could have done such technical work. There were implied images of large, ruddy-faced Slavs with fists like Polish hogs sitting before computer monitors working "cyber-magic." Somehow, the image and the deed didn't fit.

Permit me to venture the guess that the "Russian" gang behind this "virtual bank break-in" were allied with the "Russian" mafia. The latter were, in fact, mostly Jews. Wherever the "Russian" mafia showed up in the past in America, whether New York City, Southern California or Las Vegas, they proved to be Jewish, or mostly Jewish. Virtually all the "Russian moguls," who ripped off the U.S.S.R. as it died (not entirely unlike grave-robbers) and before a strong, coherent Republican government could be formed to preserve the nation's wealth for the people generally, were Jews.

Of the latter many also had dual citizenship, as they were citizens of the Israeli state, as well as citizens of the Russian one. Much wealth, according to some reports, was stashed in Israeli banks.

I bring up the moguls because I believe that they have more than a little in common with the "Russian" mafia. If I'm correct, then it followed that the "Russian" mafia had established bank accounts in the Israeli banks too.

From reports that have appeared in major newspapers from time to time, I can say that the "Russian" mafia in New York City had specialized in fraudulent credit card crimes and cyber-scams. It is likely that this gang has by now numerous very skillful internet operators.

One should bear in mind that several of the very largest businesses operating in the internet area are controlled by Jews. Google is one example. Facebook is another. EBay is another. Apple is another. Some have asserted the same of Microsoft. At any rate there are plenty. Parenthetically, some of these gather so much data on individuals that they are unofficial intelligence agencies. It isn't hard to establish that there is a disproportionate number of Jews operating successfully in this field of endeavor. Due to Jewish status as a minority (and persecuted one!), they have been able to achieve noticeably influential positions almost anywhere they choose to focus and do so without concerning themselves with matters such as "disparity."

Why could not "Russian" mafia, as with Jews generally, be very successful in the vast cyber-world? Those who recall the days of "acquisitions and mergers" may recall how numerous Jewish-operated financial organizations, such as KKR (principals knighted by QE II, as I recall; the British love pirates)), bought "sick" or "lethargic" companies and devoured the assets, cast aside the "bad" parts (usually composed of the bulk of the workers), and "spun off" the two parts as separate entities.

I ask you: Did the "Russian" gang not approach Citigroup in the same spirit?

I believe the Lithuanian bank probably was meant to be the medium for spinning the stolen funds into myriad, complex banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, and the like. Many of these may have been "shell" companies, which had been created and destroyed as if by gods. Certainly, some of the money would be "stashed" eventually in an Israeli bank, where it would be very difficult to identify and regain. Money accummulation is a kind of scorecard. The thrill of cracking Citigroup would be real, but ultimately it is the money that gives evidence that one has arrived. As Elizabeth Taylor learned from one of her husbands - probably Mike Todd, "Money is the best perfume."

Why was Citigroup so set on being dismissive in regard to this cyber-crime and its impact on Citigroup? Why did they deny much of the report printed in The Wall Street Journal?

One possibility is that the "Russian" mafia may have been in a position to blackmail important people associated with Citigroup. After all, these are corrupt times. It is also possible that the institution itself was imperiled somehow by information gathered by the "Russian" mafia. "Playing ball with extortion" might seem the better course to Citigroup, especially if their losses, etc., could be "palmed off" on the American John Q. Public.

There is another possibility: maybe Citigroup was a partner in the crime, planning on forcing insurance to cover losses, which losses would be shared with Citigroup in accounts which it held at Israeli banks with its "Russian" mafia partners.

Lastly, maybe it is the CIA which is the "invisible partner" with the "Russian" mafia. If this is the case, then the "discreet" approach of Citigroup would be understandable. It should be borne in mind that the Israeli Mossad and American CIA act closely. It would be difficult to imagine that the CIA does NOT have a secret bank account in the Israeli state. These funds could be used to pay for operations that Congress or the President need never know.

Remember: When you look into your computer monitor, its looking back at you. The only issue is: Who is the "peeping Tom?"

IS AMERICA ACTUALLY "NEW RUSSIA?"

2009-12-13T19:22:00.000-08:00

I don't know if I'm the only American who has noticed this generational phenomenon, so my comments may seem unusually stale. Nevertheless, undaunted I dare make comment on the heavy usage of the word "czar," when referencing the new appointment of someone to this agency or that commission. Is this not an odd term to have become a commonplace in American politics?

This issue has been simmering in my mind for some time. Finally, after reading about "Obama's 'Czar' earned millions from legally troubled firms" [The Washington Times, Tuesday, December 8, 2009, Frontpage], I felt to make a comment thereon. By the way, the "czar" in this case was the White House Office of Health Reform Director, Ms. Nancy-Ann DeParle. It could have referred to a plethora of men and women over the last thirty years.

The answer - or better yet, answers - is no mystery to anyone who is well-versed in contemporary politics; it is "yes and no." It is odd, based on school-book analyses of American history. It is not at all odd, if one realises that this is a signature term, which identified the incredible rise of Jewish power nearly across the board in America.

Virtually all the immigration of Jews into America during the last decades of the nineteenth century and the first thirty years of the twentieth century were Ashkenazi Jews from Poland, The Ukraine, Russia and its other "suburban" nation neighbors. The great bulk of Jews lived in those countries. This territory constituted their " 'hoods."

Of these most came directly from their 'hoods. Some temporarily took up residence in Mexico, Canada, and South America. Regardless of where they came from originally, they brought with them a "love-hate" relationship to the Romanov Tzars of Russia. The absolute power of a Tzar to command policies must have seemed a desirable, magical power by which to change the world. From the point of Jewry the defects of Tzarism resided in the Romanovs and the Slavic people generally. If this power was put in the hands of a visionary people - such as Jews - then mighty changes for good could be the natural result.

As the Tzars were perceived as anti-Jewish, the galling limitations placed upon them engendered hatred and thoughts of revenge. Jews are the historically most revengeful of people. Naturally, they deny such a comment as "a lie" and "anti-Semitic."

Although the Revolution brought about a plethora of Jewish-style committees and commissions, its power had a way of being concentrated into the hands of Comrade-Tzar Lenin. Later, the same thing would occur with Comrade-Tzar Stalin. They then might appoint a "sub-Tzar" to command policies in regard to this or that, such as the White River Canal Project.

In short, the word "Tzar" - or "Czar"- was very influential on the thinking of Jews as an embodiment of the absolute control they sought for themselves. It had totemic power in the minds of Jewry. With such power they could change the entire world. It had magical powers, which traced back centuries in the poor, superstitious enclaves of Jewry which were under the thumb of the Romanov Tzars. The absolute commands of the Tzars were like powers wielded by the "Wizard of Oz" (or any such fabulous person).

But as a satelite emblem of power, the appointment of a non-Jewish "Tzar" by Jews to administer a sub-fiefdoms was itself exceedingly gratifying, as it magnified the power of Jews themselves.

The Jews who migrated to America carried this idea of "absolute command" with them. As the Tzars used fear as a tool to enhance and preserve their autocratic rule, so Jews collectively began to move to punish a few so as to engender fear in many, as they pushed toward the levers of control. These were the Marxist-Zionist Jews, but, unlike the richer Jews of Germany, Holland, France and England, they did not seek financial-corporate control, as a means to favorably change policy. They favored the use of masses to effect change, aided by tactically-sound assassinations.

In America they formed communist and socialist parties and movements. One of the primary aims of Jewry at this time was to halt immigration-control legislation. This was primarily to protect the free-flow of communists and socialists. Both of these movements were heavily influenced by Jews. From V.I. Lenin down to ward leaders, Marxist Jews understood the need to keep the "underground" movement of trained cadres open and flowing. For the dream of global Tzarist power was the "I Have A Dream" of the Jews.

The Jewish sons of Russia (or a suburban nation) energetically labored to bring about "change" in America. Armand Hammer, head of Occidental Petroleum and patron of the Al Gore family, was the son of Russian Jewish immigrants. His father and another Jew founded the Communist Party in America. [Junior Gore's daughter married the grandson of Jacob Schiff] From labor union organization, to education, to newsprint, to movies, these "leftist" Jews found roads which led to premier launchpads for "New Policies." Marxism and Zionism intertwined like double helix, creating a "New Deal," a "Fair Deal," a "New Society," and identifying "New Frontiers." [The JFK Administration probably had as many Jews in top spots of government as FDR.]

One must be amazed by the "sheer brass" of the Jewish people. They came belatedly into the Promised Land, where, rich with the pelf of a hundred civilizations, they, Borg-like, began to consume America.

This process actually caught America in a pincer movement, as the incredibly rich Rothschild condominium, including Warburgs, Speyers, Sassoons, Lehmans, Schiffs, advanced Jewish interests in the area of corporate control. Therefore, Jews were able to create pressure from above and below. This dovetailed perfectly with the caballah-engendered formula: As above, so below.

Parenthetically, the Jewish immigrant, Jacob Schiff, according to his son, gave the Marxist revolutionary, Trotsky, $20 million in gold to take to Lenin and the revolutionaries in Russia. Naturally, among other things, this sort of money could be used to bribe strategically located people. [John D. Rockefeller was alleged to have given Trotsky $10 thousand in cash, which was rather extravagant for John D.] I saw on the History Channel a rendering of Lenin's funeral. To my surprise I saw that Jacob Schiff was one of the lead pall-bearers. I knew his image from other sources. There could be no doubt. However, the History Channel, getting "wind" of this discovery, may "doctor" or "lose" the video. I state all this to make a point well-known to those who have read beyond the Establishment histories on this subject: the incompatibility and animosity of Capitalism & Marxism does not exist at the top.

Toward the end of the 1930s, as I recall, a man (Leese?) made the comment that when Jews leave Russia, Communism will soon thereafter die. The concept was to this effect. Jews have been leaving Russia/U.S.S.R. for many decades. Back in the 1960s, a Time magazine article spoke about American economists (probably Jewish in their most influential levels) theorizing that the economies of America and the U.S.S.R would slowly merge. They spoke of the American economy becoming "communism with a human face."

Ordinary Americans have only a fuzzy notion of Communism to begin with. A very important Zionist in America during the first half of the twentieth century was Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise. He had been born in Poland about 1874. He came to the U.S.A. and became an advocate of Zionism and unofficial adviser to both Woodrow Wilson and FDR. He stated that "Communism is Judaism and Judaism is Communism." [Possibly he used the word "Marxism" rather than "Communism."] I bring this up because many people suppose that "Communism is dead." Is It?

If one looked at the changes effected in America since the turn of the Twentieth Century and the changes that occurred from the last days of Tzar Nicholas II from about the same period in Russia, one might argue successfully that more major changes occurred in America. Our changes were achieved without significant internal loss of blood, although there has been a great deal of it lost abroad, as America fought to procure a homeland for the Jews or fought the enemies of the Jews over such issues. This is not realized, as covering issues were carefully constructed. For example, FDR's luring Japan to attack, so America could get into the European war and "bail out" the U.K. Both Britain and the Jews were interested in engineering this event.

At this point in time every U.S. presidential administration is born, if not by Jewish siring, then at least by Jewish "nannying." All the media supported and will support these "Rahmanov" dynasties (or kindred ones). Over half the money gathered in by the Democrat Party is given by Jews. "He who pays the piper calls the tune," is an illustrative adage which makes the point of power clear to all.

Incidentally, one need not look to the Republican Party, which gets significant funding from Jewry, also, and which is the "home turf" of benighted Christians who see Jewry as the "Apple of God's Eye" and inheritor of the Abrahamic Covenant. These confused people will not even criticize Jews when they are clearly in the wrong, as they fear a curse from God. You have to suppose that Jews love this situation.

All of this rambling blog of mine is meant to suggest that there is a direct relationship between the rise of Jews in the American society and the frequent use of the word "Czar" by Presidents, such as Barack Obama, Billy Jeff Clinton, the Bushes, et al, and other politicians, as well as the media. I am further suggesting that the concept of "Czar" is not consistent with American traditions. Little wonder, then, that we have strayed so far from those sound traditions. Little wonder that our essential sovereignty has been cast aside for the dream of a global community. Today's Americans breathlessly wonder at who will be our first global "Czar." I can't say but make the reasonable postulation that s/he will have several very close Jewish "advisers."

ON MICROSOFT, EMAIL & WORKSPACE

2009-11-28T16:50:00.000-08:00

I believe that something is entirely amiss when a huge computer-software company such as Microsoft cannot produce any "new" application, mini-application, or "improvement" without major inconveniences. I tried to get to one of my email locations at MS Office Live recently and - and - well, let me show you the described issue(s) which I provided MS Support:

"When I try to login to my email, using this email address, as well as sfbenterprisesllc@msn.com, I am shunted into your 'Office Live Workspace' and there is no clear route to my email. How could you be so stupid as to put forth a page ('workspace') without a clear route to NORMAL login destinations, such as email? On those occasions when I do get to my email page, you saturate the right side with ads featuring half-naked men declaring their joy at being "ripped." Is Bill Gates into soft porn? I AM NOT! Please do not consider this to be an attack on Microsoft's homophilic stance. Therefore, if certain kinds of ads are UNWANTED, why not provide your customers on the receiving end a veto over what sort of ads are 'flashed' on their individual, private computer monitors. Or does Bill Gates plan to just 'grab us by the throats' and force-feed his homosexual fantasies onto the long-suffering users of MS products?"

Why does MS push their Office Live Workspace with such desperation? And why are MS applications relentlessly incompatible with other MS products? And why do they try to punish a MS user who doesn't want to switch or upgrade to their latest glitch-filled product? An example being the latest IE8 which screws up the website you built using IE7.

The latest insult is charging customers a fee to talk with their "techies" (probably situated in India) about why your MS application isn't working correctly. This appears to be no more than the old "flack-catchers" but with the new wrinkle that you have to pay them.

Microsoft has developed its Office Live Workspace to preempt the login to its Office Live email page in favor of the "cul-de-sac" known as its Workspace. Escape however you can! Microsoft won't help.

ANNE FRANK - AGAIN?!

2009-08-15T18:19:00.000-07:00

While riding about fair Northern Virginia, I heard a report on the radio that a Hollywood group planned to make a new movie based on the Anne Frank "diary." The author in question is a little girl. She is seemingly a winning little girl, judged from her real words. She wrote her diary after the fashion of a little girl. She used crayons and the like. Her words were written large. As it is, it could have make her an endearing figure.

Unfortunately, the little girl was exploited by her own family. A professional writer was hired to "polish" and "elaborate" the humble diary of Anne Frank. He used a ball-point pen to "expand" Anne Frank's diary. Ball-point pens hadn't been invented at the time Anne Frank wrote her diary. Further, the family tried to cheat the writer out of his money, and he had to go to court to get paid. He was vindicated in court, although I'm not certain that he ever received full compensation. Winning in court is one thing; collecting what you won is another.

Now, this new movie about Anne Frank might be interesting, if it focused on the exploitation of the little Jewish girl by her family and subsequently by Holocaust-pushing members of Jewry. Realistically, "truth-in-packaging" will never come out of Hollywood. Hollywood is about money, entertainment and propaganda. Due to the latter element, Hollywood would be better named "Hooeywood."

If this new Anne Frank movie comes into being, then it will be done to suit the Jewish purposes of continuation of the myth of the Holocaust, of continuation of the myth of extraordinary persecution of innocent Jews, of continuation of the myth of the "special evil" of the German people, and of offering additional support to the final solution of the German Problem - genocide through miscegenation. Hence, the "reunion of the two Germanies, the guest worker program, and the refugee/immigration program take on a strategic and evil master plan. It was such a successful plan that one sees it now as a standard policy set by elite cosmopolitans for countries from Greece to Ireland - and beyond.

Last night I watched a Netflix-provided movie called "Street Kings." It has much violence and profanity. Keenu Reeves starred as a cop given to being a "gunshooter." He is denounced by all variety of hoodlums as "white boy." This is Hollywood's typical mischief, as Mr. Reeves is clearly the fruit of miscegenation himself.

The issue here - I hasten to add - is that the various branches of European people have a right to be, and to live as, a people. Rich, Royal, Masonic and/or Jewish people don't have any more right to plot their genocide than the Nazis had the right to plot the genocide of the Jews, if they indeed did so. The latter proposition I don't believe, as there is no sound evidence that makes it credible. As stated, there are repeated statements of a hate-filled and genocidal type by elements within Jewry toward Germans and toward white people.

Having stated this, I acknowledge the given: Jews deny all [they are never censored as "deniers"]. Everyone is against them. There are vast industries operated by non-Jews, creating fraudulent documents that are alleged to be the work of Jews. These were done strictly to defame the innocent Jews. Hate-filled "Christians" and/or neo-Nazis conspire against these gentle, talented people.

Interestingly, prominent members of Jewry across modern times have hoved to this same theme of hostility toward European, or White, people. Illustrations of this have been read into the Congressional Record and have been published. People never believe these. That any people could think this way seemed too far-fetched to credit. All such alarums are dismissed as prejudiced and anti-Semitic.

In America only "terrorists" are considered to be possibly evil. Curiously, Menachim Begin once snorted: "Terrorism - we [Jews] invented it!"

The Romanov family would back up Begin's statement - were they alive.

SEPARATION OF SYNAGOGUE AND STATE

2009-06-25T22:13:00.000-07:00

The unfortunate trend toward the union of Synagogue and State in the United States must come to an end by a public disavowal of the Jewish religious imperative Tikkum olam ("repair of the world"). It is the driving force in American foreign policy and permeates the once largely Anglo-Saxon Common Law Tradition, founded on the Bible. The Jewish Law of the Repair of the World is based on rabbinic interpretations, which placed them in the position of "molders & shapers" of the lesser breeds.
With such concepts one can easily see how Jewish influence penetrated Great Britain, eventually taking command of the now domesticated John Bull. Once the sons of Canaan and Esau had played their role of Uriah Heep successfully enough to hold most of John Bull's IOUs, then the knighthood of Boy George, David Bowie and Elton John was inevitable.
For many decades the British royalty has placed their financial eggs with the Jewish foxes to invest, and this pitiful dependency symbolized the yoked John Bull. It is only a matter of short time before the sovereign of Great Britain is from some Jewish house made a peer in the 19th Century.
All of this sort of thing may resurrect, or at least reinforce, the Merovingian drive to be proclaimed "King of Jerusalem," capital city of the World Government.
With Great Britain and Europe obviously courtiers of their sovereign, "Collective Jewry," can one expect Americans to refuse a ride on the "bandwagon?" Probably not. However, the renouncing of the union of Synagogue and State by the Democrat-Republican Central Committee would be a hopeful sign.
Since Justice Ginzburg is said to read from the Talmud daily, she would not likely vote against the lawfulness of the the conjectured union. Nor would Justice Breyer find fault in such a union. Nor would any of the Masonic justices be likely dissidents, as they believe that "lodge brothers" outside American territorial jurisdiction should be heard from before the Brotherhood of the Supreme Court "gets a grip" on the issue.
With the U.S. supreme Court lined up in favor of the union of Synagogue and State, concerned citizens might well turn to Congress. Lots of luck!
Further, count on Big Business to look favorably on this event. Why not? Many are led by people who are not Americans, or who have dual citizenships, or who graduated from Ivy League schools, such as the Great Yezhivah, Harvard University, and who are "ravening dogs" for global government. Folks, they are too big for America. The world is their oyster.
Is there any hope for John Q. Public?
Yes, civil war in the Great Synagogue as fanatical factions seize each other's throats, and, like the Gingham Dog and the Callicoe Cat of the tale, tear each other to shreds.

GUNS AND ANGER

2009-06-10T20:25:00.000-07:00

Today, as I was driving in Northern Virginia, listening to my radio, I heard that there had been a shooting at the Holocaust Museum. As the reports issued from several different people, one was immediately aware that things were sketchy. Apparently, two security guards had been shot by an intruder, who may well have had others in mind as targets. The intruder had been shot. He and a security guard were rushed to the same hospital. George Washington University Hospital. The reports indicated they both might be in critical condition. Further, the museum had been evacuated and closed to the public. A spokesperson announced that the museum would be opened again to the public on Wednesday, the 11th of June.

What is going on here? What could the motivation be?

A very singular aspect of this is that the intruding shooter was in his 80's. It is true that in eighty years one might develop some serious grudges, but this is a bit much. In listening to the reports, the identity of the man was known. He had been a "captain" of a PT-Boat during World War II. As far as I know, that probably means that he was an U.S. Navy officer fighting in the Pacific Ocean arena. He earned four medals for courage. He ended his service as a lieutenant. As far as I know, he may have know John F. Kennedy, who also served on a PT-Boat, when he served in the Pacific war zone, if, indeed, that is where he served.

Further, according to the radio news reports, this shooter had entered the grounds of the Federal Reserve facility on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C., carrying some kind of firearm on one occasion. I cannot recall if this event was in the 70's or one of the flanking decades. It was viewed as a serious infraction. He was sentenced to prison, where he stayed as an inmate for seven years.

So, what do we know? He appears to be a warrior. He appears to be a man who will act upon a belief. He has suffered, has experienced death in wartime, and has spent a lengthy stretch in hard-time. [No one who takes a gun "after" the Federal Reserve will go to "Club Fed."] Prison wasn't likely to be an improving experience. It seems likely that whatever grudges he held against the Establishment generally and/or Jewry, particularly, could not have been ameliorated with incarceration. Why not? Was there no psychological help provided in seven years? Did not the experts perceive a man who might rightly be called a "time-bomb?" Isn't it strange how men such as this shooter are never perceived by these experts whose penal skills have undoubtedly been improved with F.B.I. "profiles" and "psychological analyses" of similar offenders?

Whether this man is married with family, I cannot say. He may be an altogether isolated individual. If the latter, he may have reached out "not wisely but too well." With no one willing, or even interested in, his "grudges" he found himself aligned with society's "costumed bizarre" elements. Unrealistic visions may have seemed more valid, where there were others to share the dream (whatever it is).

For an old, patriotic American who is coming to the end of his days, perhaps mostly alone, the news of ancient men being manacled and sent to Germany as criminals for "crimes" against humanity was too much. He saw men, who were gray, wizened and hunched, sandwiched between hulking "men in black," guarding lest he "make a break for it." He may have seen that these antique men had been accused of 36,000 infractions against humanity, while guarding inmates in a concentration camp, many of whom were Jews. He may have felt some unrealistic association with such men's fate.

How does an old warrior express himself at such times? If his vision was delusional, so were the visions of many another. American soldiers are said to be committing suicide at unprecedented rates in Iraq and Afghanistan. Is that basically what this shooter was doing? His actions seem entirely consistent with those of a warrior who knew that his mission would not ever allow him to return home again.

In the Theatre of the Absurd the unreality of the shooter's vision embraced the bete noir of Jewish delusion-incarnate. Insanely, it was the innocent who suffered most. In the madness many never saw the blood.

Outside, another unreality was forming, as newspeople from around the world hastened to the Holocaust Museum and/or George Washington University Hospital to begin weeks of neverending reportage, while a massive traffic jam had formed from the mall to the 14th Street Bridge past the Pentagon, past Shirlington, past Alexandria to the "mixing bowl" of Springfield.

Nothing could easily dislodge this event from Prime Time. As with the trial of Charley Manson, horror and entertainment will surely vie for the public's understanding of this events.

AN OPEN BLOG TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

2009-04-02T21:44:00.000-07:00

Mr. President:

Show me the money! There is no point in your pretending to be President of all the people of the United States of America, when, in fact, you are merely the "pal" of all the big banks, investment houses, and corporations too big to fail because they are so heavily invested in a worldwide web of derivatives that they must be propped up on the collective backs of the people. Let them fail & fall. It will only cost you your financial friends, but why should you need a set of proven incompetents?

Oh, I know! You politicians have given the bankers the sole power to create money for the citizenry, so, if we are to regain a healthy level of liquidity, it is the banks that must do it. Your hands are tied by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, you say? Rubbish!
Instead of pretending to be "Lincolnesque," why don't you be Lincolnesque in fact. How? Have your Democrat Party peers pass legislation to issue two trillion dollars in "green backs" which are full, legal tender and which can be used (and must be accepted) by the citizenry for payment of all debts, whether public and private. Pay this money directly and indirectly to the citizens of the country through the Small Business Administration's issuance of interest-free, twenty year grants to America's small businesses. Pay it directly to senior citizens (62 years old or older) as a "Thank You" dividend, as they are the ones who, despite the destructive "policies" coming out of federal and state governments, kept the nation moving forward. Through the office of the Surgeon General, provide funding for the nation's ill who are unable to cope with the costs. Using the Army Corps of Engineers and other federal offices, pay it directly and indirectly to the companies and people involved in infrastructural work so broadly, deeply needed in this country. Surely, there are other sensible ways of putting those "green backs" into the hands of the people.
The recipients of these "green backs" will then put their money into the banks of their choosing. Hence, your beloved banks would, in fact, soon have the funds deposited in them. As the deposits are "on call" by the people, rather than loans to the people "on call" by the bankers, there is a good chance that the bankers won't go immediately irrational in their banking procedures. With "money in the bank" the people will lead the nation out of its present problems by the simple method of spending the new money in the many diverse and mundane ways that living in America demands. This allows money (a nation's blood) to work itself through the "body politic."

In short, Mr. President, fund the small businesses and the people (as noted above) of America and get out of the way. Go play "b-ball" because your problems will be over domestically, and you can relax. As for the failing big banks, America is used to disaster from hurricanes, tornadoes, forest fires, floods, and worse; they can handle the demise of Citicorp. Can your European pals? Can you?

TOXIC ASSET???

2009-03-23T15:35:00.000-07:00

Recently, the Obama Administration's Secretary of the Treasury spoke of the urgent need to remove toxic assets from the ledgers of our most important banks. One reason to do this, stated Treasury Secretary Geithner, is to "encourage" them to lend money again. Why is it important to have them lend again? Because the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 removes the money creation process from the amateurs at the Department of the Treasury and the Bureau of the Mint and places it with the professional "money men" in the American private banking system.
The passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 put the nation into the Era of the Moderns. Our money system would be scientifically managed. No longer would Americans be hostage to "boom-or-bust" cycles. About five depressions (1920, 1930, 1980, 1992, and 2008) and several recessions later, Americans wonder if there may be something wrong with the concept of "scientifically managed money." Maybe, a few wonder, it would be better to go back to the original concept in the U.S. Constitution of the federal government printing the nation's money free of interest burden, which interest burden the present system embraces. The needful money could easily be injected through a series of regional federal banks located in each state, from which necessary funds could be drawn to build and repair infrastructure, build and repair dams, build and repair alternate energy facilities, build and repair railroads, waterways and everything which is infrastructural, para-infrastructural, or useful and needful. The federal government could lead the way in paying a truly fair wage to its workers, based on the requirements to live decently for one day. This would not include ugly Republican concepts such as tomato ketchup soup. It is not inflationary to pay to build assets for the nation, such as bridges and dams. It is not inflationary to pay laborers a decent wage. It is not inflationary to invest in our elderly people's welfare by paying a decent social security payment. In the last case the payment should be based on what is needed to live decently, not on what the individual paid into the system.
On the other hand paying "gamblers" a trillion dollars to replace the roll of dough they just "blew" by a combination of greed and foolishness cannot be justified. Instead, give that trillion directly to the American people and then tell them to deposit thier money in the bank of their choice. Let the people choose who wins or loses, not pals of the banking speculators, such as Geithner.

How could an asset be toxic? Behold deceitful terminology at work in the Obama administration.
Will Barack Obama follow Abraham Lincoln or Paul Warburg and that crowd? Where do you think the bankers are placing their bets?

OBAMA DEFINES THE "CHANGE" HE BRINGS

2008-11-15T23:47:00.000-08:00

There need not be any caution in regard to discerning the meaning of change Mr. Obama plans to bring to America. He stated what it is. He brings precisely the same policy progression as the Bushes, Clinton, Reagan and Carter. He is finishing off "America the Bankrupt" under an expanded spending program. It hardly matters that W. did his injury through war and the funding of a real estate bubble through the very institutions which created the bubble, and Obama plans to fight a new "war on poverty" funded by the banks that created the impoverishment of America through usury and fractional banking (a premier engine of monetary expansion to begin with).

As this form of "money creation" seems to have developed in Babylon (an author write a book he entitled The Babylonian Woe), it is not startling to discover that the primary preservers of this system over the last twenty-five hundred years have been elements of the Jewish population, especially the Sephardim. The twin Jewish gifts to Europe and the world have been money changing/usury and the cabala (the latter being somewhat familiar to all the "mystery religions"). They invented neither but perceived the power available through each and ran with it. The Jews possess good intelligence which over many hundreds of years honed and, where possible, broadened it.

Utilizing these gifts, Jews were able to convert some sharp nonJewish minds to the "mysteries" of the cabala, which, in effect, let loose fecund "termites" to undermine Christianity. On the other hand Jews led elements of the royal and aristocratic establishment in Europe more and more into the practice of accepting adventagiously priced loans on the one hand and relying on Jewish advisers to be "stewards" of increasing portions of their money. This eventually led to the first national central bank in Europe, the Bank of England.

The lessons learned from this experiment in money creation led to the development of other central banks across Europe. As the European Royalty tended to cross-pollinate, news of the great "windfall" of money had by the Royals and some other nobility must have gotten around. One expression around Cromwell's time was "Drunk as a Lord." The inebriated are not known for their discretion.

In the developing expertise of Jewish financiers was the technique of loaning to the sovereign forms of money which were collateralized by the labor of the poor. It is this process which ultimately broke the back of the American Promise to all its citizens. Every citizen of America has an equal share of the national debt but not an equal share of the national wealth. Most American citizens have a negative worth, when the national time-bomb is factored into the equation. The national debt should be tiered, so that rich individuals such as Donald Graham would bear a burden equal to 95% of his gross wealth, while the impoverished would bear the burden of one-half what they can beg on a given day.

Of course, there was never any need to have a gigantic national debt to begin with. Since it is people such as Donald Graham, whose rabbinic ancestors helped to develop the system known as the "Babylonian Woe," and who helped to undermine the Constitutional method by which the federal government spent needed currency into the economy through useful projects, affording gainful employment in the process, and issued under its sovereign power as legal tender. By this means banks are not really required as extraordinary national engines, pumping money into the economy by means of loans. This latter technique requires that the money in circulation can never cover all debts, as the aggregate is issued with an interest burden, and any new money appropriated to cover past debts is itself issued at interest, creating a shortfall by the weight of the difference.

The men behind the "bankers' coup d'etats" included men who were motivated by greed. However, among their banking numbers were men motivated by a sense of destiny to create a "New World Order." Since such men could not openly achieve their desire, as it required the treasonous assassination of the nation (here, U.S.A.) to achieve the world government desired, they operated "by way of deception." Further, since their absolute numbers were small, to attempt to achieve their aim rapidly by violence was very risky. Nevertheless, the Russian Revolution briefly afforded the exhilarating thought of "world revolution, now!"

Saner heads realised that by using central banks, usury, and fractional banking, they would not need armies of soldiers to conquer the world. They would use politicians and economists to gradually, bloodlessly (more or less) create their long-dreamed-of New Order. Using the educational system, youngster could be raised to feel that they had a vested interest in "the system." For most this meant becoming the "collateralized labor." By this means the sovereign citizenry of America, as envisioned by the Constitution, have become "sharecroppers" at best. Their crop is, of course, debt. The holders of that debt are the New American Sovereigns.

The problem with the American economy is the technique by which money is created. It should NEVER be issued through private banks, which have regularly and annually abused their privileged position. The Establishment defends this form of money creation because it is the very means by which they maintain their group hegemony. They created the "science" of economy to be its "Temple Guards."

Money should be spent into the economy by the federal government without any interest burden at all. The money injected into the economy becomes the pool of legal tender. It expands as needful projects are undertaken. Ultimately, the pool will redistribute, as some are energetic and idea-driven and will develop businesses to market these ideas, while others will decline to work much and become the lower class. As Christ noted: "The poor ye will always have with ye." Put another way, "You can bring a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

Inequality is a law of nature. The unnatural people of the New World Order deny this fundamental truth, but Truth will find a way!

Mr. Obama has appointed a rabbi, Rahm Emanuel, as his "chief of staff." He is hastening to add additional Jews, Freemasons, retreads from past administrations, and generally trekking along in the Jimmy Carter "era of change." Incidentally, the rabbi is an elected representative to Congress, and he was a high appointee within the Clinton Administration, prior to that. W. also appointed a rabbi to high executive position, Ari Fleisher, who was the official spokesperson for the president to the White House Press, and others.

This is not to say that all rabbis, or, indeed, all Jews, hold the same views. There is, however, clear evidence from the unfolding of history itself that a powerful force within Jewry has worked consistently to achieve a common, messianic vision.

That Capitalism and Communism were both dominated ideationally, as well as by "chief executives," "supreme councils" and "round tables," by this alluded to element is clear by roll-call and observation of their effect upon policy. All the top leaders of the Russian Revolution were Jews (often changing their names Madeleine Albright-style to conceal their origins). Stalin appointed Jews to head every Warsaw Pact nation, with Tito being "non-aligned." One Jewish family, the storied Rothschilds, were said by their own sanctioned family biographer to be richer than any European nation at the time, and, indeed, specialized in loans to nations. The weren't the only Jewish families operating at the time, as the Warburgs can attest. And The Washington Post Company's Donald Graham would certainly want his ancestral firm, Lazard Freres, to be mentioned, along with its leading family, the Franco-Jewish Davids.

When Ms. Shehan tried to speak to elected officials about the war in Iraq and the death of her son, very few prominent ones made themselves available. Yet, when the American-Israel Political Action Committee [AIPAC] held an annual powwow, over 60 U.S. Senators showed up and struggled among themselves in regard to who got to kowtow first. Jews provide over 50% of the donations to the Democrat Party. Only the ill-educated at the hands of America's educators would fail to realise that "the man who pays the piper calls the tune."

The term "disparate results" has no meaning or application when it comes to Jews. All federal courts and the Supreme Court can be counted on to find a pretext why disproportionate numbers of Jews in government and industry are "Constitutional." Probably the "holocaust."

It is these people who will guide President Obama, whose absentee record as an elected official suggests that he'd prefer the glamour of the job, leaving the policy construction to "his White House staff" and appointed Cabinet secretaries. Hence, the "same crowd" will continue to do what they've done for every president since my birth during the WW II, work to achieve Tikkun olam.

LIFE IS GOOD

2008-06-14T16:17:00.000-07:00

I find the "street" a very rewarding place. I can't say precisely when it occurred to me that the "street" was bountiful, but at some point it happened: The Epiphany. The "street" is a "way" by which blessings are provided to those with "eyes to see." I have found folding money on the "street." Maybe a five dollar bill and a few ones. The cash is RIGHT THERE. I need only reach down to pick it up. This is so excellent! Ever since the moment when I realised that something special had just occurred, I have received my "allowance" from the "street." I have never worked in my life. Why work when the "street" provides for all my needs? Dimes and quarters are strewn about the "street" with a generosity that truly moves me. The "street" provides me with bus and subway fares. The "street" feeds me--not after the unwholesome diets of the "bigwigs"--but with the Earth's true bounty. I eat carrots, nuts, berries, milk, eggs, and a variety of green "veggies." I am not married. I have no children. Therefore, I am free to adopt nature and wander this Earth, taking care of my "adoptive children." The "street" offers me my "social security." It is true that a cashless and changeless world would alter my lifestyle. Yet, there have always been "hobos" who have always found a way to "make it." So, I keep my eye lowered--not due to the vanity of false modesty--but to glean from the fields ("street") my daily needs. Life is good!

The Democrat Race

2008-05-31T22:12:00.000-07:00

What is going down with the Democrats?

No one in their right mind can sort out the confusion. It appears that these people want to put a sort of multiplicity of parties, after the French style, incarnated in two people, and then put both people on one ticket. Barack and Hillary? Hillary and Barack? How many minority factions can you squeeze into two people? With Barack Hussein Obama you can squeeze in African, African-American, Mixed, heterosexual, "bi-sexual," Christian, Muslim, husband, father, young, Martin Luther King style orator, JFK style orator, peace politics, friend of Israel, friend of Islamic countries, civil rights leader, and visionary of change.

In Hillary one can squeeze lawyer, commodities speculator, Methodist, Jew, Atheist, wife, adultress, lesbian, First Lady, Senator, mother, millionaire, feminist, friend of Israel, hands-on experience, planner, street-fighter, bolshevick, and friend of Hollywood.

No matter how you combine these two on one ticket, you've got the country and world covered.

What in the world could a grouchy antique martinet offer to overcome the Democrat's plethora of incorporated parties within Barack & Obama? Go figure!

CHILI

2008-02-10T20:36:00.000-08:00

If America should have a "national food" of record, I believe that chili should be given serious consideration. I fixed a pot this morning and have felt good all day. Chili does that for a man. It is both robust and subtle. As for taste, hmmmnn, hmmmnnn, good!

While many do not feel that they can take the time to prepare a good pot of chili, reaching instead for a tv dinner/frozen entree, I find the preparation enjoyable. My appetite is honed as I add each ingredient. As the food simmers, I enjoy the scent it emits. I even like the bubbling of the brewing chili.

As I cook, I often find myself humming a song or bursting into song. Folks, when you can sing, you don't need a radio--and I can sing!

One of the interesting things about preparing the pot of chili is that the odor changes as different ingredients are added. I never tired of it at all, and the scents worked on my imagination something fierce. Well, there it is! I'm exposed as being an ogre. People, I can put away some food! (I realise that such commentary opens me up for serious criticism from that crowd which is much concerned with global foodstocks.)

I never really get fat. My body is a high-burner, I guess.

Today, I put a very large pot-skillet on a gas stovetop, and began. My first cooking effort had been rice, so, after removing the greater part of that to a container, I left a respectable amount in the pot. After pouring in more water, I added navy and black beans, which I had ground to powder in my coffee bean grounder, and stirred it into the rice & water brew. At the same time as this was happening, I was defrosting a package of frozen , low-fat beef (ground) in a microwave. I put into the pot a good sprinkling of chili powder, black pepper, red "hot" pepper seeds, Italian herbs, garlic (3 cloves-diced)and onion (one-diced). After stirring these ingredients, I added a can of Hunt's tomato sauce, the ground beef, a diced tomato, two small, diced, redskin potatoes, and six diced baby carrots. Now, this wasn't rushed, and I got to savor the scent of each, as it joined the mix. More chili powder was added, as well as black pepper. Another can of Hunt's tomato sauce, and a can of Walnut Acres organic baked beans were added. The latter due to my prejudice that bean-based chili should "show" some whole beans. All these and a bit more herbs and I'm done, but for the stirring into a proper texture and appearance.

As I certainly planned to eat a part of my chili as soon as possible, I prepared a "background" for the chili to rest upon. My choice was four jumbo eggs, which were partially cooked, covered with Sargento sharp cheddar cheese, and reheated. When this base was completed and crowned with chili, I felt like a king. Some may sneer: "a hobo king!" I'm not offended at all. I am a "man of the road." And for me, a big bowl or plate of chili is the American food of record.

MUSIC WARS

2008-01-07T07:51:00.000-08:00

This weekend the property owner from whom I rent a small office decided to dispatch some workers to do some repair work. One of the old tenants had moved out of his set of offices to either retire from the practice of law or move to another location. I would guess the latter, as I never heard of a lawyer retiring unless completely disabled--usually by death.

Therefore, there were two sorts of work being done: 1.) renovation of a suite and 2.) hanging new doors to each office on the floor. The workers were all Latinos and numbered between two and six, depending on day and hour.

As I needed to be at my office to do some projects, I spent a good part of Saturday and Sunday at my office. I don't like to work on Sunday, but on occasion there are strong pressures to do so.

What is usual at construction/renovation sites occurred: hammering, sawing, and the like. These tend to be intermittent and I accept them with as good cheer as possible.

The workers were, at their greatest number, five men and one woman. Somehow, they were able to create the illusion of a whole union. I've seen this done in movies, especially war movies. For example, a few men try to create the illusion of being a whole army. Being noisy is a key element in this ruse. However, in this instance, the workers were naturally loud and expressing themselves according to their custom. This wasn't limited to "shouting at one another," which may be a Latino "macho" thing. They had thoughtfully brought their boombox.

Soon, Latin music, including singing, rose to compete with the exuberant shouting. Latin men seem to like to drop their voices into a growling, raspy initiation of some observation or other. Again, possibly a macho thing, or conceivably and expression of solidarity with some beast or other. All these elements blended together to make a merry worksite, according to some points of view.

Call me a "blue meanie" if you like, but I'm not a big fan of Mexican-style music. I applaud some Latin singers for having good voices and being able to sing a melodic line. I am one of the few living Anglos who still appreciates melody. Still, enough is enough!

In my office is a rather good musical device. I play a CD with happy results. I have the power to "uplift" its volume at my ease with my "remote." I have a couple of effective speakers. The decision was made by me to play some of my own music--music which I often find soothing and helpful to continue working, when energy levels begin to flag.

Selecting my favorite "Die grosse Jodellieder" CD, basically a hitparade of Swiss yodelling. putting side 2 in my player first, selecting level 34, I remote-commanded the instrument to begin. It did.

There was a sudden hiatus in the hallway. What is this crazy American up to?

My yodelling hitparade ruled the floor. I felt a deep satisfaction.

There is much to say in praise of Swiss yodelling. The sounds can be down-right heavenly. I would not be surprised, when my time comes to enter the "Pearly Gates," if angels on adjacent clouds weren't singing Jodellieder. Therefore, not only did I project a massive wave of pleasant mountain "airs," sharing with all this mighty sound, but completely routed the offending noise.

However, I must say that the Latino workers were a game lot. They put up a very good noise- fight before being forced to retreat to the backroom, where their whimpering boombox was sobbing hysterically. For some other musics the Swiss Jodellieder seems unfair competition. How can we war against singing angels? they wonder.

Indeed!

THE LAUNDRAMAT

2008-01-04T08:50:00.000-08:00

Every week I go to the laundramat. I don't have to go. The place where I live has a $1000 washing machine and an expensive dryer as well. This being so, why do I go to a laundramat? Why spend at least $5.00/wash-n-dry when the whole thing could be done free? [I still resonate to the old adage: "A penny saved is a penny earned."]

Well, for one thing, the $1000 washing machine starts to act "stressed," whenever I put more than five items of clothing inside it and turn it "on." Further, the dryer goes "belly up"--like an opossum feigning death--whenever it senses that the washing machine has left too much water in the clothing. What a hassle!

Furthermore, this whole process of cleaning and drying a week's worth of dirty laundry on these expensive machines is at least five hours. Who in his/her right mind wants to allocate five hours of good old Saturday to laundry? One would have to be a complete "homebody."

I can go to my favorite laundramat, toss the whole load into one machine, and thirty minutes later, it is finished. I cart it over to the dryers, toss the clothes into two of them, and within thirty minutes they are finished. [I never completely, thoroughly dry my clothes, as the process causes injury to the textiles, hastening the day when worn spots, holes, and thread-faulting occurs.]

There are ancillary benefits to using laundramats. In modern America the laundramat is the heart-n-soul of cultural diversity. Therefore, one is often afforded an opportunity to "brush up" on one's English, Chinese, Indian, Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Swahili, Rastaman, and an array of others.

The laundramat I favor is presently owned by a Korean couple. The previous owners were a Southern couple, who were Scott-Jewish, as I recall. The present owner has a large television. He typically keeps it on the Cartoon Network. I suspect that this was his attempt to create harmony, as the frequent use of a Spanish-speaking network must have engendered complaints from the numerous people who speak some English but no Spanish. How this sits with the large population of Latinos, who also frequent the laundramat, I can't say. As is often the case in such situations, the blandest or least challenging television network fares best. Also, children are somewhat distracted from their usual, "high-speed" play by the Cartoons--always a plus.

One can easily appreciate how laundramats not only do a good job washing-n-drying clothes, but they also offer unexpected diversions almost every time.

TECH PEOPLE

2008-01-03T10:11:00.000-08:00

I went to my computer this morning, thinking that I'd make a quick circuit through my business email before going out into the "field." The first thing I checked came up a "cropper." There was the grey, somber notice that "Internet Explorer" could not find the website. I tried other "favorites" from Verizon Business to MSN to eBay to Google, always resulting in the same grey notice. What gives?

I checked my modem lights, and they all indicated that I was connected to the internet. I decided to reboot the computer. After going through the restart process, I again hit the favorites line-up. Darn! There was that same grey notice that Internet Explorer just coudn't connect.

Now, my "thing" is not deep study of computer science--no, not even shallow study. I'm sort of a "toe in the water" type. Therefore, I knew that I wasn't going to solve the problem myself. Still, male aggression exerted itself just enough for me too scan the Internet Options setting on my Tools dropdown button. Looked ok to me.

I knew it was time to turn to a "pro." I dialed up Verizon Business. A woman's taped voice welcomed me into the mysteries of--of--sex? Of course not! I was asked to verify this and choose that, finally ending up at the DSL tech-support niche. After about 7-8 minutes of waiting, at which time I whiled away my time observing my messy office and wondering how it could have gotten to this state of absurd clutter, I was awakened, so to speak, by a woman who identified herself as "Laurie."

That name always brings into my mind the actress, Piper Laurie, and then, soon after, the movie, CARRIE, also starring Sissy Spacek. Still, although a little apprehensive, I got a "grip" on myself, using such thought support as "Steady lad!"

Well, as things turned out, this Laurie was a most excellent representative of the Verizon techie team. After describing my problem and stating the attempts I had made to overcome the problem, she calmly went through the steps needed to check out the problem, beginning with the modem. I must say that Laurie used clear instructions as to the things that I should do to help her help me. Nevertheless, even step-by-step and color-coded guidance can engender in me the "duh" response, or the utter non sequitur response, followed by a wildly impulsive, primitive-male attempt at repair work.

I will say this much: Laurie never lost her calm, reasonable explication of what should be done and why. Except perhaps that one time. It was a sort of inborn female trait, which allows mothers to usually keep their children from disastrous steps, which caused a certain up-tempo exclamation: "No, don't do that!" Fortunately, I had shared with her my intention, and she was able to cause a quick cessation.

Well, the upshot was that my techie guide was able to get the old computer "rocking" again, and I was left thinking, once again, that Verizon has a good group of tech support people. [This was not my first cry for "help" by any means.] This is something worthy of comment.

Behold! Here it is: A blog salute to the tech support people at Verizon. Well done, people.

01/01/08: "7/11"-RESTAURANT PRO TEMPORE

2008-01-01T19:17:00.000-08:00

If one is ill-prepared, January 1, can "do a body harm." This is going to be the last year I ever look in my refrigerator and see nothing to eat. What to do? Everything seems closed on New Years Day.

Whoa! Wait a minute! What NEVER closes, even when everyone's been killed in a stick-up?

A 7-Eleven Convenience Store never closes. Godzilla, terrorists, perfect storms--no problem! So, I took my hunger there. Drat! Hordes of people had hit my favorite 7-Eleven before I could make it there. Sleeping late on New Years! I made every error in the book. You never sleep late on New Years, if your refrigerator is empty. My bad!

Still, I managed to pick up two quarter-pounders, a kielbasa, a banana (not squishy), and a bag of Cheetos. Oh, and a 24 oz. cup of fresh coffee (regular). [Do I seem a little hyper? What are you looking at?]

Retiring into my mini office, I set my "feast" on an adjacent table, turned on the tv expecting to see a little "run left, run right, run up the gut, etc.," and to my bitter surprise, I find myself watching a news program about a nearby so-and-so who had won millions in the lottery. Frankly, I prefer lottery winners to be far away. It sort of reenforced my notion that January One was not my day.

I started in with the quarter-pounder, followed with the kielbasa, continued with another quarter-pounder (all of these with mustard only), knocked off the Cheetos (after struggling about ten minutes opening the plastic bag), and then finished the banana for desert.

I felt a little "piggy" already. My heart was working hard. [Possibly the coffee at work, I thought. But who knows?]

Still, there was some sort of surge, allowing me to propel myself into hours of pointless activity at the keyboard of my computer. My fingers didn't seem to be functioning with their usual dexterity. Was it some sort of new syndrome? I hear about new syndromes nearly every day on radio and television news programs, as well as info-mercials.

I am NOT a hypochondriac. It's just there are all these things going wrong, doncha know? Do ya?

I don't point the finger of guilt at 7-Eleven. My own doings. I feel bloated though. The coffee helped anyway.

What are you looking at?

DESTROYA (IT MAKES YA PARANOIA)

2008-01-01T18:07:00.000-08:00

Many observers of the American scene express relief that our troops and swat teams are only practicing "urban warfare" in America. Why? Because it means that the Top Cats in the highest bunkers in our federal government don't think it is necessary to "nuke" one of our cities. At least not yet. It sort of depends on the vicissitudes of warfare in the Middle East. If Jorge W. Arbusto is presented the opportunity to "nuke" Iran (or some other member of the Axis of Evil--a membership which may grow as 2008 progresses), then the likelihood of dropping the Big One on an American city recedes greatly. But as a lame duck president longing to be notice by historians, urged on by Daddy and high executive advisers, and jealous less brother Yeb should enter the White House and achieve greater acclaim than he, Jorge's itchy finger must be twitching above the "red button." Like some satellite Israel (sic), Jorge appears to be trying to surround his Crawford, Texas, ranch with nuclear missiles-- on the sly. Wags calls it: The ultimate Alamo defense--it's such a potent offense! Xs & Os. Stay low & keep your feet moving!

As long as I can remember, there have been mushroom clouds in the background, mushroom clouds in the background, just as long as I can remember!

When did it all start? I can't say, because:

As long as I can remember, there have been mushroom clouds in the background, mushroom clouds in the background, just as long as I can remember.

Say!? Are you a cop?

Who are you?

2008-01-01T18:01:00.000-08:00

Here is are two blog referrals:

Gobigfoot.wordpress.com

bloglines.com/blog/JetINight/

Guest Blog

2007-10-17T09:51:00.000-07:00

As a "new kid" on the block, I want to make a referral 'til I can post my own. Therefore, take a look at guest blog:
nomoonnight.wordpress.com

nomoonnight's weblog

"Faux News".